Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Slade3200]

BULLSHIT.

Read your Constitution. Article 3 Section 2 spells out exactly what judges have jurisdiction over. War is not on the list.

Article 3 states explicitly that all trials shall be by jury, except for impeachments.

Matters of law most often go to judges. Look up this thing called SCOTUS. Learn something

 

[scruffy]

Matters of law most often go to judges. Look up this thing called SCOTUS. Learn something

Stupid leftard, READ the Constitution..it's right there in front of you in black and white.

 

[Mac1958]

Colorado Supreme Court justices face a flood of threats after disqualifying Trump from the ballot

The latest round of threats fits a familiar pattern: Trump faces a legal setback, and officials face threats.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[scruffy]

Gee, do you also have their home addresses? Phone numbers? Names of family members?

Yes.

Shameful thread.

Not yet.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Trump and the Insurrection Act: The Legal Framework

The evidence is sufficient to indict Trump under the Insurrection Act, 18 U.S. Code § 2383 writes University of Chicago Criminal Law Professor Al Alschuler.

www.justsecurity.org

No insurrection without both the house and Senate making that determination.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Colorado Supreme Court justices face a flood of threats after disqualifying Trump from the ballot

The latest round of threats fits a familiar pattern: Trump faces a legal setback, and officials face threats.

www.nbcnews.com

Numbnuts you do realize the Colorado supreme Court put a halt to their ruling. Even they feel like what they did was beyond their authority.

 

[Mac1958]

Numbnuts you do realize the Colorado supreme Court put a halt to their ruling. Even they feel like what they did was beyond their authority.

Good. I agree. It was a bad idea, as I have said many times.

Which, of course, has nothing to do with the threats.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

/——-/

It's still irrelevant since it takes the house and Senate to make that determination

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Good. I agree. It was a bad idea, as I have said many times.

Which, of course, has nothing to do with the threats.

Leftists are a threat

 

[Leviticus]

200 pages can't paper over the fact that he hasn't even been charged with insurrection, let alone convicted.

Punish first, then let the law shake it all out, right uncle Josef?

Criminal charges are not Required to bar someone from running for public office under the fourteenth amendment. It can be done purely on a civil basis. A lawsuit was filed by citizens of colorado to remove him from the ballot under the fourteenth amendment. And their state supreme court Rules in their favor. It does not matter whether or not he was ever charged or convicted.
Just like it didn't matter of that none of the Members of congos who were removed for their part in the confederacy, wherever convicted of a crime.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. And since you refuse to post it, highlight what you are talking about, and explaining what they mean, you obviously have nothing.

I see Confederate president Jefferson Davis agrees with you. The secessionist president.
But anyway section 3 states it takes both house and the Senate to deem who were insurrectionists. Do read and comprehend before commenting again.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Criminal charges are not Required to bar someone from running for public office under the fourteenth amendment. It can be done purely on a civil basis. A lawsuit was filed by citizens of colorado to remove him from the ballot under the fourteenth amendment. And their state supreme court Rules in their favor. It does not matter whether or not he was ever charged or convicted.
Just like it didn't matter of that none of the Members of congos who were removed for their part in the confederacy, wherever convicted of a crime.

It takes both house and Senate to make that determination

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You can stop spamming the board with New Shit You Just Learned about the constitution now. We get it.

Section three is very clear who has the authority. And it ain't a state unelected supreme court.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

it’s obvious that you’re trolling in the hopes of getting this thread turfed.
Loser play.

It's obvious you can't handle the facts

 

[bigrebnc1775]

A triggered snowflake!

Jefferson Davis loves his little uncle tom

 

[Care4all]

It's still irrelevant since it takes the house and Senate to make that determination

Only the house and Senate can give permission to reinstate an insurrectionists to office....

Otherwise the house and Senate are not involved in section 3.

 

[BS Filter]

Thank you for admitting that trump is not innocent.

Then prove it in court with a jury.

 

[Care4all]

Then prove it in court with a jury.

Tell your orange boy, to STOP STALLING AND DELAYING his court trial dates....

 

[BS Filter]

Tell your orange boy, to STOP STALLING AND DELAYING his court trial dates....

Nope. All perfectly legal. Whine.

 

[MinTrut]

Okay my fellow MAGAs and law abiding citizens. Should they be given the treatment like Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett got outside their homes by radical leftists? They've been identified. They've committed treachery!

Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

The unelected justices of the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the people of Colorado cannot vote for former President Donald Trump on the ballot for the 2024 presidential election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Those are the TRUE faces of insurrection.