Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He hasn't even been charged with insurrection, dummy.Yes. Ineligible.
So is holding office after having engaged in insurrection.![]()
The ruling is irrelevant why do you continue to use that shit?Have you read the ruling?
So, politics and not the rule of law.If this unConstitutional verdict by only 4/7 of Democrat-appointed justices were allowed to stand, 32 Red states could decide to kick Biden off the ballot for violating the Constitution while deliberately not enforcing our border.
You mean the part where Congress can undo the disqualification by a 2/3 majority vote in both houses?Read it simp. Especially the very last section where it says Congress.
And they would have justification with biden's border problemIf this unConstitutional verdict by only 4/7 of Democrat-appointed justices were allowed to stand, 32 Red states could decide to kick Biden off the ballot for violating the Constitution while deliberately not enforcing our border.
Congress determines who did an insurrection simp do keep up. It's your favorite amendmentYou mean the part where Congress can undo the disqualification by a 2/3 majority vote in both houses?
Literally the only only role for Congress in section 3?
Why would they grant a stay rather than just ruling on it?The SCOTUS is likely to at least grant an extended stay to prevent the enforcement of the Colorado Supreme Court decision beyond January 4, 2025.
And ultimately, by all means, I believe it almost a certainty that they will quash the manifestly lawless decision by the Colorado court.
The ruling does not apply outside of Colorado, and the state high court, whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, paused its decision until Jan. 4 — one day before the deadline for Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold to certify the candidates for the state's March 5 primary.Why would they grant a stay rather than just ruling on it?
Yes, you can write his name in.Can you vote for Charles Manson?
You mean the part I just explained to you, dupe?Congress determines who did an insurrection simp do keep up. It's your favorite amendment
Congress both upper and lower houses make the determinationYou mean the part I just explained to you, dupe?
How about you post exactly what you’re referring to rather than swinging through your enclosure slinging crap.
Where is that required?He hasn't even been charged with insurrection, dummy.
Show me, chimp.Congress both upper and lower houses make the determination
Your weak ass explanation was wrong
We are already there and I don't like it one bit.So, politics and not the rule of law.
Do, explain this banana republic you want fir our country.
Of Course the US Supreme Court will reverse that courts decisions. As to acting like Democrats, we must preserve our differences and not act like they act.No, they shouldn’t. The proper place to petition your government, state, or federal, for the redress of grievances, is AT the government, not at their homes. In other words, picket the courthouse…but their homes should be off limits.
Besides, their neighbors shouldn’t have to suffer a mob shouting for hours on end because of something a judge did.
No, I think it should go through the appeals process and work through the system legally. Protesting outside of someone’s home isn’t killed going to have any affect other than to galvanize them.
I understand playing the lefts game the same as they do, but not at someone’s house…
If they follow the constitution, this should be overturned easily ..