Education Dept. : BDS activity against Israel will be defined as anti-Semitism

[rylah]

Originally posted by rylah
@P F Tinmore
You support Hamas?

I support them as refugees wanting to return home not as theocrats wanting to create a islamic state after they return home.

It would be a disgrace to see the jewish racial dictatorship being peacefully dismantled at long last only to be replaced by a islamic religious dictatorship.

Hamas identifies as an invading colonial power in it's covenant, not as refugees.
Basically it's just a competing version of the Caliphate.

 

[rylah]

That's comical as you have consistently maintained "this is not about religion".

The overwhelming majority of palestinians reject a theocratic state that imposes sharia (the diaspora in Jordan, Lebannon, Syria and the rest of the world is particularly secular).

And Tinmore is right... it is a typical ethnocratic conflict between settlers from another continent and the native population.

That's total BS, Hamas was elected by a majority.
Both PLO and Hamas legislation is Sharia Law.

By excluding the Jews from native population Your argument automatically falls into the category of antisemitism.

 

[rylah]

Q. How much cognitive dissonance does it take to tweet “I don’t hate Jews, I hate Zionists” just SEVEN MINUTES after saying “when Palestine is returned, just know there will be NO mercy what so ever, every last Jew will die”?

 

[Shusha]

Not true. Palestinian Jews had the same rights as everybody else.

When you have to qualify a statement by separating a group into pieces -- some of whom have rights and some of whom do not -- you are displaying anti-semitism.

The correct argument to the claim of "Arab land" would have been that it was "land belonging to communally to legal citizens of the territory". You should be arguing WITH me and not AGAINST me.

Whenever someone argues "Arab land" you should be arguing, "No, its Palestinian Arab and Palestinian Jewish land".

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not true. Palestinian Jews had the same rights as everybody else.

When you have to qualify a statement by separating a group into pieces -- some of whom have rights and some of whom do not -- you are displaying anti-semitism.

The correct argument to the claim of "Arab land" would have been that it was "land belonging to communally to legal citizens of the territory". You should be arguing WITH me and not AGAINST me.

Whenever someone argues "Arab land" you should be arguing, "No, its Palestinian Arab and Palestinian Jewish land".

I never used the term "Arab land."

Why do you always have to divide people?

 

[Hollie]

Not true. Palestinian Jews had the same rights as everybody else.

When you have to qualify a statement by separating a group into pieces -- some of whom have rights and some of whom do not -- you are displaying anti-semitism.

The correct argument to the claim of "Arab land" would have been that it was "land belonging to communally to legal citizens of the territory". You should be arguing WITH me and not AGAINST me.

Whenever someone argues "Arab land" you should be arguing, "No, its Palestinian Arab and Palestinian Jewish land".

I never used the term "Arab land."

Why do you always have to divide people?

That’s really ironic. You should read the PLO Charter prior to whining about dividing people. That piece of Arab-Moslem fascism literally screams out Arabism and Arab supremacist ideals.

 

[Kondor3]

Muslim-Arab Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza need to pack up and move elsewhere.

While they still can.

 

[rylah]

Not true. Palestinian Jews had the same rights as everybody else.

When you have to qualify a statement by separating a group into pieces -- some of whom have rights and some of whom do not -- you are displaying anti-semitism.

The correct argument to the claim of "Arab land" would have been that it was "land belonging to communally to legal citizens of the territory". You should be arguing WITH me and not AGAINST me.

Whenever someone argues "Arab land" you should be arguing, "No, its Palestinian Arab and Palestinian Jewish land".

I never used the term "Arab land."

Why do you always have to divide people?

Hamas is using the terms "Isalmic Land", "Waqf Land" and "lands conquered by Islam by force"
several times in their covenant. In adition Hamas chief spokesman promised to:

1. "to cleanse Palestine of Jews by 2022"
2. "establish a Caliphate"

BDS and Hams are mutual supporters, and identify as such in public.
BDS is basically a Hamas front on the campus.

 

[Shusha]

Not true. Palestinian Jews had the same rights as everybody else.

When you have to qualify a statement by separating a group into pieces -- some of whom have rights and some of whom do not -- you are displaying anti-semitism.

The correct argument to the claim of "Arab land" would have been that it was "land belonging to communally to legal citizens of the territory". You should be arguing WITH me and not AGAINST me.

Whenever someone argues "Arab land" you should be arguing, "No, its Palestinian Arab and Palestinian Jewish land".

I never used the term "Arab land."

Why do you always have to divide people?

Others did. Why aren't you calling them out for it?

 

[Coyote]

Muslim-Arab Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza need to pack up and move elsewhere.

While they still can.

Why?

 

[Coyote]

That's comical as you have consistently maintained "this is not about religion".

The overwhelming majority of palestinians reject a theocratic state that imposes sharia (the diaspora in Jordan, Lebannon, Syria and the rest of the world is particularly secular).

And Tinmore is right... it is a typical ethnocratic conflict between settlers from another continent and the native population.

That's total BS, Hamas was elected by a majority.
Both PLO and Hamas legislation is Sharia Law.

By excluding the Jews from native population Your argument automatically falls into the category of antisemitism.

It isn’t total BS.

P F Tinmore what is so funny about excluding Jews from the rest of society?

When did I ever say that?

You said:
"All land that is not privately owned is communal land. It is owned collectively by the citizens."
as an argument that public land is "Arab land", thus automatically excluding all Jews from collective ownership and citizenship.This is repeated each time a word 'Palestinian' is used to refer exclusively to Arabs.

Isn’t the same exclusionary principle at play when you refer to Palestinians as “Arab Moslems” implying they are foreign invaders in a Jewish land?

 

[José]

Originally posted by rylah
By excluding the Jews from native population Your argument automatically falls into the category of antisemitism.

No sir.

European converts to Judaism are physically indistinguishable from their fellow european converts to Christianity.

They didn't speak any language derived from Hebrew or Aramaic, they eat the dishes and wear the clothes they themselves created in Eastern Europe and they had no nationalistic link to Palestine only a religious one.

By stating those europeans of jewish faith were part of the native population of Palestine YOU immediately join the group of those who stubbornily refuse to put down the crack pipe.

 

[Shusha]

Originally posted by rylah
By excluding the Jews from native population Your argument automatically falls into the category of antisemitism.

No sir.

European converts to Judaism are physically indistinguishable from their fellow european converts to Christianity.

They didn't speak any language derived from Hebrew or Aramaic, they eat the dishes and wear the clothes they themselves created in Eastern Europe and they had no nationalistic link to Palestine only a religious one.

By stating those europeans of jewish faith were part of the native population of Palestine YOU immediately join the group of those who stubbornily refuse to put down the crack pipe.

What do you propose as an objective test to see if someone and all their descendants are "converts" and not "real Jews"? And how will you apply that to Arab Palestinians?

 

[José]

Originally posted by Shusha
What do you propose as an objective test to see if someone and all their descendants are "converts" and not "real Jews"? And how will you apply that to Arab Palestinians?

Confronted with the undisputable fact that the conflict in Palestine is an ethnocratic struggle that pits the native population against settlers from Europe and unable to present any valid counter-argument, the zionists, in total desperation, start using the tactic of trying to at least confuse, muddle the issue with pathetic, crazy arguments such as this:

"We can only state the IP conflict is an ethnocratic conflict after we perform genetic tests in at least 10 million Jews and 10 million palestinians."

"Since we cannot deny the natives vs settlers nature of the conflict let's start splitting hairs, let's raise the bar to an impossible height by demanding individual genetic tests on each and every Jew and Palestinian."

"Since we cannot deny the big picture of colonialism let's start trying to delegitimize the true nature of the conflict by focusing on a microscopic, irrelevant level."

 

[José]

I have seen this same zionist using this crazy people' "argument" with naive, credulous posters like Coyote several times and it seemed to be a very successful tactic given the fact that Coyote didn't want or couln't expose the sheer madness of it.

The problem is José is no Coyote.

 

[Ecocertifmrl]

BDS and Hams are mutual supporters, and identify as such in public.
BDS is basically a Hamas front on the campus.

 

[Ecocertifmrl]

Muslim-Arab Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza need to pack up and move elsewhere.

While they still can.

EXCEPT THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO.

 

[Ecocertifmrl]

When you have to qualify a statement by separating a group into pieces -- some of whom have rights and some of whom do not -- you are displaying anti-semitism.

so chauvinism is also antisemitism? Your terms are getting complicated. How about writing your very own dictinary and add it here so it is possible to converse with the english language with you?

 

[rylah]

Originally posted by rylah
By excluding the Jews from native population Your argument automatically falls into the category of antisemitism.

No sir.

European converts to Judaism are physically indistinguishable from their fellow european converts to Christianity.

They didn't speak any language derived from Hebrew or Aramaic, they eat the dishes and wear the clothes they themselves created in Eastern Europe and they had no nationalistic link to Palestine only a religious one.

By stating those europeans of jewish faith were part of the native population of Palestine YOU immediately join the group of those who stubbornily refuse to put down the crack pipe.

Wait what?!
Measuring Jews by physical appearance to exclude them from collective rights - where have we seen this before? ...Oh yeah Nazi Germany eugenics:

And I thought You tried to prove that BDS wasn't using racist rhetorics...truly sad.
You know why? Because the US is one our few true friends all along the 3,500 years of troubled Jewish history, and I don't know any world power that attempted to erase the Jews and didn't go down the sink of history, works like a Swiss watch.
I hope America takes measures fast and confronts that mental disease that's being spread by Your racist ilk. The American society deserves better than this.

 

[fncceo]

Originally posted by Shusha
What do you propose as an objective test to see if someone and all their descendants are "converts" and not "real Jews"? And how will you apply that to Arab Palestinians?

Confronted with the undisputable fact that the conflict in Palestine is an ethnocratic struggle that pits the native population against settlers from Europe and unable to present any valid counter-argument, the zionists, in total desperation, start using the tactic of trying to at least confuse, muddle the issue with pathetic, crazy arguments such as this:

"We can only state the IP conflict is an ethnocratic conflict after we perform genetic tests in at least 10 million Jews and 10 million palestinians."

"Since we cannot deny the natives vs settlers nature of the conflict let's start splitting hairs, let's raise the bar to an impossible height by demanding individual genetic tests on each and every Jew and Palestinian."

"Since we cannot deny the big picture of colonialism let's start trying to delegitimize the true nature of the conflict by focusing on a microscopic, irrelevant level."

Does it ever bother you that no matter how much you believe what you're saying, it has absolutely zero effect on the existence of the State of Israel?