Economic growth comes only from Republican inventions?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Economic growth comes only from new Republican inventions:
10,000 years ago when everyone was subsistence farming with their hands liberals would have handed out welfare(stimulated Keynesian demand) from the best farmers to the worst farmers thus discouraging everyone from working, and pushing humanity below the subsistence level needed to support life on this planet.

Republicans would have organized the best and brighest (top 1%) to invent or supply (supply side economics) the farm plow so human life could expand 100 fold.

 

[Moonglow]

Then that would make them Whigs...

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Then that would make them Whigs...

it would make them responsible for economic growth

 

[sealybobo]

Economic growth comes only from new Republican inventions:
10,000 years ago when everyone was subsistence farming with their hands liberals would have handed out welfare(stimulated Keynesian demand) from the best farmers to the worst farmers thus discouraging everyone from working, and pushing humanity below the subsistence level needed to support life on this planet.

Republicans would have organized the best and brighest (top 1%) to invent or supply (supply side economics) the farm plow so human life could expand 100 fold.

Well in 2019 Trump and Republicans had 2.3% growth. Candidate Trump would not be happy with President Trump.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Economic growth comes only from new Republican inventions:
10,000 years ago when everyone was subsistence farming with their hands liberals would have handed out welfare(stimulated Keynesian demand) from the best farmers to the worst farmers thus discouraging everyone from working, and pushing humanity below the subsistence level needed to support life on this planet.

Republicans would have organized the best and brighest (top 1%) to invent or supply (supply side economics) the farm plow so human life could expand 100 fold.

Well in 2019 Trump and Republicans had 2.3% growth. Candidate Trump would not be happy with President Trump.

But it sure beats the Green New Deal Second Great Depression and Communist Revolution proposed by the Democrats!

 

[Oddball]

Economic growth comes only from new Republican inventions:
10,000 years ago when everyone was subsistence farming with their hands liberals would have handed out welfare(stimulated Keynesian demand) from the best farmers to the worst farmers thus discouraging everyone from working, and pushing humanity below the subsistence level needed to support life on this planet.

Republicans would have organized the best and brighest (top 1%) to invent or supply (supply side economics) the farm plow so human life could expand 100 fold.

Supply-side is a variation on Keynesian economics.....Prolly should re-check your premise.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Supply-side is a variation on Keynesian economics...

any reason to think that??? Afraid to tell us what that reason is?

 

[sealybobo]

Economic growth comes only from new Republican inventions:
10,000 years ago when everyone was subsistence farming with their hands liberals would have handed out welfare(stimulated Keynesian demand) from the best farmers to the worst farmers thus discouraging everyone from working, and pushing humanity below the subsistence level needed to support life on this planet.

Republicans would have organized the best and brighest (top 1%) to invent or supply (supply side economics) the farm plow so human life could expand 100 fold.

Well in 2019 Trump and Republicans had 2.3% growth. Candidate Trump would not be happy with President Trump.

But it sure beats the Green New Deal Second Great Depression and Communist Revolution proposed by the Democrats!

The green new deal when it finally happens will be an economic boom. Like y2k

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The green new deal when it finally happens will be an economic boom. Like y2k

1) First new deal was a depression; second green new deal looks worse
2) Y2K was not boom or bust but neutral

your post was garbage logic

 

[Oddball]

Supply-side is a variation on Keynesian economics...

any reason to think that??? Afraid to tell us what that reason is?

Ask Toro

Supply-side is a variation on Keynesian economics...

any reason to think that??? Afraid to tell us what that reason is?

Both presuppose The State as the driver of economic activity...Only the details slightly differ.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Both presuppose The State as the driver of economic activity...Only the details slightly differ.

wrong of course. Supply-side seeks to reduce state influence in order to increase supply. Keynes sought the exact opposite. Now do you understand?

 

[Oddball]

Both presuppose The State as the driver of economic activity...Only the details slightly differ.

wrong of course. Supply-side seeks to reduce state influence in order to increase supply. Keynes sought the exact opposite. Now do you understand?

Reduced influence isn't none at all.....A three iron and a seven iron are still golf clubs.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Reduced influence isn't none at all.....A three iron and a seven iron are still golf clubs.

its not like a 3 and a 7; its like opposites. 3 and 7 both shoot toward hole. Supply shoots toward freedom and Keynes shoots toward government. Got it now?

 

[Oddball]

Reduced influence isn't none at all.....A three iron and a seven iron are still golf clubs.

its not like a 3 and a 7; its like opposites. 3 and 7 both shoot toward hole. Supply shoots toward freedom and Keynes shoots toward government. Got it now?

"Toward freedom" doesn't take The State out of the equation (i.e. real total laissez-faire freedom), nor does it remove the presumption that it controls the overall economy.

If cutting taxes is great for the economy then why not abolish them outright?....Quit pussyfooting around within the Keynesian model.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

"Toward freedom" doesn't take The State out of the equation

since that would be totally and 100% impossible it is irrelevant to us

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

nor does it remove the presumption that it controls the overall economy.

we are not trying to remove the presumption, but rather to reduce the influence of the state as our Founders did by writing the Constitution.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If cutting taxes is great for the economy then why not abolish them outright?..

then there would be no government, anarchy, mob rule, civil war. etc. 1+1=2

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

....Quit pussyfooting around within the Keynesian model.

no idea how opposing it is pussyfooting around with it. Please think before you post.

 

[Oddball]

....Quit pussyfooting around within the Keynesian model.

no idea how opposing it is pussyfooting around with it. Please think before you post.

I've thought about it more than you know....Supply-side is just a little tinkering around with the Keynesian central planner model....You're not opposing it, you're arguing shades of grey.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

..Supply-side is just a little tinkering around with the Keynesian central planner model...

it opposing it which is not tinkering around with it. Do you understand?