Sure it had nothing to do with the 24 day heads up for onsite access or Irans outright refusal to admit inspections in places, all negotiated with Obama?
Again, all based on your feelings. Yet Trump replaced it with nothing? And then it went up? How do you even justify it?
Trump pulled out in May 2018, but Iran didn't immediately restrict inspectors. Iran began breaching the JCPOA limits in 2019, one year after the US withdrew. Arms Control Association During this window, the OLEMs were still running and inspectors still had access, so the IAEA was able to confirm each step up in enrichment in real time. In July 2019, the IAEA confirmed Iran had breached both the 300kg stockpile limit and the 3.67% enrichment limit. Then in January 2021, the agency confirmed that Iran began enriching to 20%, and to 60% in April 2021.
So those headline numbers: 4.5%, 20%, 60% were all caught while inspectors still had meaningful access.
In February 2021, Iran halted the more intrusive verification measures required by the JCPOA, such as implementation of the Additional Protocol, daily access to Natanz and Fordow, and continuous surveillance of certain sites.
This is when the picture got murky. The IAEA reported that it "lost continuity of knowledge in relation to the production and current inventory of centrifuges, rotors and bellows, heavy water and uranium ore concentrate, which it will not be possible to restore."
So Trump put us in this position in the first place. And you idiots thought it was OK because you thought they weren't actually abiding by the rules, or that it didn't have any acutal benefit? And your belief on that was based on no evidence. You need to have evidence to backup your beliefs. That's the biggest thing that Maggots should understand.
24 days heads up for onsite access doesn't really matter ultimately. Substantial violations would not be hidden by 24 days. the half life of nuclear material is thousands of years.
Then Trump's white house annouced in 2025 that the Iran nuclear facilities were completely obliterated, and any comments otherwise was fake news -
Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News
So what does that make you? Are you guys the fake news now because you are suggesting that it wasn't obliterated?