- Mar 11, 2015
- 98,929
- 97,681
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #61
That doesn't happen.
E Pluribus Unum
- Thread starter IM2
- Start date
- Mar 11, 2015
- 98,929
- 97,681
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #62
Whites like you don't seem to understand that the group who gets hired due to their skin color the most are whites. And your analogy about the NBA doesn't apply due to the way players are picked and the fact that whites work in nearly every other aspect of the business except on the court. That is why the NBA is majority black, but has a white commissioner.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 98,929
- 97,681
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #64
That means whites were given free land and blacks were initially excluded. Then:
“During a period where many citizens were given public land by the government, Blacks who wanted to be small farm owners had to pay for their land and struggle against obstacles that most of their White counterparts did not.”
“As early as 1865, certain white Southerners put legal obstacles in place to prevent ex-slaves from acquiring property. In the provisional state governments under President Johnson’s protective leniency, planters not only prohibited black landownership but enacted extreme measures of social control that virtually restored slavery. The black codes struck directly at freedmen striving to escape their subordination and to obtain their communities. It was class and race legislation.”
You really don't know what you're talking about. So like I said, Whites like you need to STFU about free money, or for that matter, free anything. Now would you like to try making excuses for 1.29 quintillion worth of help whites got from the government that blacks didn't in the 20th century?
I agree, so why do we need some sort of agency policies??America is a result of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, and Inclusion. E Pluribus Unum means exactly that. Out of many, one is DEI. But like almost everything else in this nation's history, DEI was fine as long as diverse groups of whites came to this country. Like welfare, which was established in the 1930's and excluded blacks this was a good national goal until non-whites actively tried being included in E PLURIBUS UNUM.
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it
“No president in the United States of America can change the constitution or change law — like the 1964 Civil Rights Act … through executive action or executive order,” said House of Representatives Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Thursday during his weekly press conference. He vowed that Democrats would take the attacks on DEI “head-on” along with civil rights groups.
“The motto of the United States of America is E pluribus unum: Out of many, one. That’s diversity,” said Jeffries.
Jeffries continued, “The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, one of the most important amendments in our country, provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity.” He added, “In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America … and in that pledge, we promise one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for All … that’s inclusion.”
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it (Watch)
The House of Representatives minority leader vowed that Democrats would take on the attacks on DEI "head-on" along with civil rights groups.thegrio.com
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 148,657
- 33,621
- 2,180
Again, my white family never received any free money going back three generations .You can't strike a nerve unless what is said is true.
The Homestead Acts gave away 246 million acres of land. Research shows that 99.73 percent of that land went to whites, including white immigrants. 1.5 million white families were given free land, the equivalent of a minimum of $500,000 per family. Today 93 million whites still benefit from the Homestead Act, this is about 40 percent of the current white population in America.
Whites were given free land by the government.
Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination: The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership
This paper examines the U.S. government’s instigation, participation, authorization, and perpetuation of federal housing discrimination against black-Americans from the 1930s to the 1980s and the damage that such discrimination caused and continues to cause today. Delving into the U.S. government’s twentieth century federal housing practices, this paper discusses how the government effectively barred black-Americans from obtaining quality housing and from investing in housing as wealth, while simultaneously subsidizing and endorsing white homeownership, white suburbs, and white wealth. Quantifying the U.S. government’s discriminatory practices with current wealth gaps between white- and black-American communities, this paper discusses the effects of twentieth century federal housing discrimination and argues that such government-initiated wrongs justify black reparations.
Part I examines the U.S. government’s housing practices—from the New Deal until the 1968 Fair Housing Act and its 1988 Amendments—to reveal that although the New Deal’s national housing programs revolutionized homeownership and home equity in the United States, the U.S. government’s federal housing programs were racially discriminatory. Specifically, and quite shockingly, the U.S. government actively created and promulgated racist neighborhood rating systems that constructed black neighborhoods and black property as unstable, volatile, hazardous, and not worthy of investment. Using these racist rating systems, the federal government endorsed racial covenants and invested federal money into the creation and accumulation of white wealth, the value of whiteness, white suburbia, and white homeownership. Meanwhile, the government denied blacks federal housing funding, fueling black stigma and barring black-Americans from the invaluable twentieth century opportunities of homeownership and home equity.
Understanding the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices, Part II discusses and quantifies the effects of the government’s housing discrimination on black-American households and communities. Finding that approximately 120 billion 1950s dollars—or more than 1.239 quintillion 2019 dollars—were invested to subsidize and create white-American wealth through homeownership.
Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination: The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership
This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first documented arrival of Africans to the United States, which resulted in the enslavement of approximately 4 milpapers.ssrn.com
That's more than 1 quintillion dollars whites were given or invested in whites that blacks were excluded from in the 20th century.
So like I said:
Whites like you really need to shut the fuck up about somebody else getting free money.
Where’s your proof? It seems your ignorance is impeding your brain
E Pluribus Unum was just referring to the Union formed by several states. It had nothing to do with DEI.America is a result of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, and Inclusion. E Pluribus Unum means exactly that. Out of many, one is DEI. But like almost everything else in this nation's history, DEI was fine as long as diverse groups of whites came to this country. Like welfare, which was established in the 1930's and excluded blacks this was a good national goal until non-whites actively tried being included in E PLURIBUS UNUM.
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it
“No president in the United States of America can change the constitution or change law — like the 1964 Civil Rights Act … through executive action or executive order,” said House of Representatives Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Thursday during his weekly press conference. He vowed that Democrats would take the attacks on DEI “head-on” along with civil rights groups.
“The motto of the United States of America is E pluribus unum: Out of many, one. That’s diversity,” said Jeffries.
Jeffries continued, “The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, one of the most important amendments in our country, provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity.” He added, “In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America … and in that pledge, we promise one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for All … that’s inclusion.”
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it (Watch)
The House of Representatives minority leader vowed that Democrats would take on the attacks on DEI "head-on" along with civil rights groups.
Equal protection under the law is not equity, it's equality.
And justice for all, that one he got right. All means everyone; regardless of color
TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 2,819
- 1,800
- 893
It isn’t any of that.
But the white “nationalist” crowd sucks up every one of these racist tropes and clings to them bitterly.
DEI is the new “n” word.
TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 2,819
- 1,800
- 893
fuckin moonbats
I wasn’t aware that people who core about American values are moombats.
But since Trump cultists are now openly disparaging democracy pretty much daily here now, I guess it must be 9to you, at least)
TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 41,127
- 56,809
- 3,615
The Democrat Party's hate and racism is why Biden lost.
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 74,754
- 65,505
- 3,615
English, do you speak it?
sapphiregirl
Gold Member
- Jul 28, 2024
- 362
- 328
- 173
TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 2,819
- 1,800
- 893
Better than you do. And considerably better informed, as well.
TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 2,819
- 1,800
- 893
Your childish paper/glue fallacies are deplorable and stupid.
Bigotry is the core of Trumpism.
TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 95,797
- 59,244
- 2,605
How come all the newer posters are binary dipshits? Did you all come from some other website that got shut down? Probably by the FBI?
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 74,754
- 65,505
- 3,615
TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 2,819
- 1,800
- 893
Deflection dismissed.
You didn't address my post at all. You just made up something irrelevant.
But Trump sheep are openly disparaging democratic values and American values all over this forum and in this very thread.
Care to explain?
Similar threads
