E Pluribus Unum

[IM2]

America is a result of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, and Inclusion. E Pluribus Unum means exactly that. Out of many, one is DEI. But like almost everything else in this nation's history, DEI was fine as long as diverse groups of whites came to this country. Like welfare, which was established in the 1930's and excluded blacks this was a good national goal until non-whites actively tried being included in E PLURIBUS UNUM.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it​

“No president in the United States of America can change the constitution or change law — like the 1964 Civil Rights Act … through executive action or executive order,” said House of Representatives Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Thursday during his weekly press conference. He vowed that Democrats would take the attacks on DEI “head-on” along with civil rights groups.

“The motto of the United States of America is E pluribus unum: Out of many, one. That’s diversity,” said Jeffries.

Jeffries continued, “The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, one of the most important amendments in our country, provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity.” He added, “In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America … and in that pledge, we promise one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for All … that’s inclusion.”

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it (Watch)

The House of Representatives minority leader vowed that Democrats would take on the attacks on DEI "head-on" along with civil rights groups.

thegrio.com

 

[TNHarley]

fuckin moonbats

 

[IM2]

Allentown police secure search warrant to collect DNA sample of city worker in noose investigation

The warrant was served Friday without incident.

www.wfmz.com

A person preoccupied with RACE, like the very black and very real OP, must be furious with a black person who lies about a racist hate crime!



OP surely condemns a black person faking a HATE crime.

THERE IS SO MUCH REAL HATE CRIME, A FAKE HATE CRIME IS UNNECESSARY, RIGHT?

And what does this have to do with the thread topic?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

But DEI is about Left Wing racial hatred, stereotyping, prejudice and employment discrimination.
DEI is also a bureaucratic employment boondoggle.

 

[IM2]

Everything. Fake Race hustler.

Fake race shit, like the content you provide daily is a reason for the abject failure of DEI.

Your bullshit lampooning is detrimental to the cause. Not helpful.

It is actually overtly racist to use a black sock puppet.

View attachment 1071762

Another off-topic post.

 

[MisterBeale]

Out of many, one is DEI.

No it isn't.


DEI is a policy that came out of the school of critical theory.

". . .Pluckrose points out to her readers that CSJ theory interprets social justice, commonly understood as a principle advocating fairness and equality for all, in a profoundly different way — it is a “critical approach,” referring to a distinctive standpoint ingrained in identity-based power dynamics. As the term’s authors Ozlem Sensoy and Robin DiAngelo explain, this theoretical perspective “recognizes that society is stratified (i.e., divided and unequal) in significant and far-reaching ways along social group lines that include race, class, gender, sexuality, and ability.”

The buzzword “critical,” thus construed, the spirit of which is epitomized in overblown academic jargon such as “critical learner,” “critical pedagogy,” and “critical scholarship,” bears no resemblance to the commonsensical understanding of the concept of “critical thinking” as the evaluation of truth claims on the grounds of reasoning and evidence, but refers to the scrutiny of prejudices and discriminations assumed to have woven into the social fabric, policing the use of language that perpetuated oppressive attitudes, beliefs, and narratives, and ultimately dismantling the imbalanced power structures. To be “critical” (or “woke”) is, therefore, to cast an indictment at alleged social injustices with blind conviction and to be obliged to awaken others to the invisible power structures. Indeed, to quote the CSJ theorist Alison Bailey, “a critical learner is someone who is empowered and motivated to seek justice and emancipation.”

It should be patently clear to even casual observers that what those CSJ assumptions and declarations constitute is a doctrine that is, in Pluckrose’s apt words, “dogmatic,” “authoritarian,” and “cynical.” May I add that the CSJ dogma is also blatantly anti-intellectual and manipulative? How could it not be, when critical researchers claim that Critical Scholarship is “not out to create truth” but “an active identification of and engagement with power,” and critical pedagogy does not regard claims students make as “propositions to be assessed for their truth value, but as expressions of power that function to re-inscribe and perpetuate social inequalities”?

'Counterweight' to Conformity | The Daily Economy

"This book an accessible guide to understanding the 'once insurgent but increasingly entrenched ideology' that has inflicted upon society a c ...

thedailyeconomy.org

The United State is based on Enlightenment values, NOT critical theory or "DEI."

The Origin of Critical Theory: From Enlightenment to the Frankfurt School • Public Administration Notes by PubAdmin.Institute

Imagine a world where our understanding of society, politics, and culture is not just accepted at face value but is critically analyzed to reveal deeper

pubadmin.institute

 

[ColonelAngus]

OP post things that are antithetical to accomplishing anything for DEI.

IT IS A SHAME, race baiters ruin it for people who actually suffer from racism.

 

[MarathonMike]

America is a result of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, and Inclusion. E Pluribus Unum means exactly that. Out of many, one is DEI. But like almost everything else in this nation's history, DEI was fine as long as diverse groups of whites came to this country. Like welfare, which was established in the 1930's and excluded blacks this was a good national goal until non-whites actively tried being included in E PLURIBUS UNUM.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it​

“No president in the United States of America can change the constitution or change law — like the 1964 Civil Rights Act … through executive action or executive order,” said House of Representatives Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Thursday during his weekly press conference. He vowed that Democrats would take the attacks on DEI “head-on” along with civil rights groups.

“The motto of the United States of America is E pluribus unum: Out of many, one. That’s diversity,” said Jeffries.

Jeffries continued, “The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, one of the most important amendments in our country, provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity.” He added, “In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America … and in that pledge, we promise one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for All … that’s inclusion.”

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it (Watch)

The House of Representatives minority leader vowed that Democrats would take on the attacks on DEI "head-on" along with civil rights groups.

thegrio.com

More fakery and deception from the Democrat Regime and their faithful paid minion IM2. DEI is a VERY RECENT and VERY FAKE invention that pretends to be all about "inclusion" and "diversity". What DEI really is about is exclusion of certain Races while favoring those of different Races. That has nothing to do with America at all.

 

[Scoutster]

 

[Nostra]

America is a result of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, and Inclusion. E Pluribus Unum means exactly that. Out of many, one is DEI. But like almost everything else in this nation's history, DEI was fine as long as diverse groups of whites came to this country. Like welfare, which was established in the 1930's and excluded blacks this was a good national goal until non-whites actively tried being included in E PLURIBUS UNUM.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it​

“No president in the United States of America can change the constitution or change law — like the 1964 Civil Rights Act … through executive action or executive order,” said House of Representatives Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Thursday during his weekly press conference. He vowed that Democrats would take the attacks on DEI “head-on” along with civil rights groups.

“The motto of the United States of America is E pluribus unum: Out of many, one. That’s diversity,” said Jeffries.

Jeffries continued, “The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, one of the most important amendments in our country, provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity.” He added, “In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America … and in that pledge, we promise one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for All … that’s inclusion.”

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it (Watch)

The House of Representatives minority leader vowed that Democrats would take on the attacks on DEI "head-on" along with civil rights groups.

thegrio.com

DEI is dead.

Unfortunately for you, you will now be judged on the content of your character and not the color of your skin.

Sux to be you, loser.

 

[MarathonMike]

DEI is dead.

Unfortunately for you, you will now be judged on the content of your character and not the color of your skin.

Sux to be you, loser.

That's what the younger generation of Blacks want, not the crutch of victim hood that the Al Sharptons and the IM2s cling to.

 

[IM2]

No it isn't.


DEI is a policy that came out of the school of critical theory.

". . .Pluckrose points out to her readers that CSJ theory interprets social justice, commonly understood as a principle advocating fairness and equality for all, in a profoundly different way — it is a “critical approach,” referring to a distinctive standpoint ingrained in identity-based power dynamics. As the term’s authors Ozlem Sensoy and Robin DiAngelo explain, this theoretical perspective “recognizes that society is stratified (i.e., divided and unequal) in significant and far-reaching ways along social group lines that include race, class, gender, sexuality, and ability.”

The buzzword “critical,” thus construed, the spirit of which is epitomized in overblown academic jargon such as “critical learner,” “critical pedagogy,” and “critical scholarship,” bears no resemblance to the commonsensical understanding of the concept of “critical thinking” as the evaluation of truth claims on the grounds of reasoning and evidence, but refers to the scrutiny of prejudices and discriminations assumed to have woven into the social fabric, policing the use of language that perpetuated oppressive attitudes, beliefs, and narratives, and ultimately dismantling the imbalanced power structures. To be “critical” (or “woke”) is, therefore, to cast an indictment at alleged social injustices with blind conviction and to be obliged to awaken others to the invisible power structures. Indeed, to quote the CSJ theorist Alison Bailey, “a critical learner is someone who is empowered and motivated to seek justice and emancipation.”

It should be patently clear to even casual observers that what those CSJ assumptions and declarations constitute is a doctrine that is, in Pluckrose’s apt words, “dogmatic,” “authoritarian,” and “cynical.” May I add that the CSJ dogma is also blatantly anti-intellectual and manipulative? How could it not be, when critical researchers claim that Critical Scholarship is “not out to create truth” but “an active identification of and engagement with power,” and critical pedagogy does not regard claims students make as “propositions to be assessed for their truth value, but as expressions of power that function to re-inscribe and perpetuate social inequalities”?

'Counterweight' to Conformity | The Daily Economy

"This book an accessible guide to understanding the 'once insurgent but increasingly entrenched ideology' that has inflicted upon society a c ...

thedailyeconomy.org

The United State is based on Enlightenment values, NOT critical theory or "DEI."

The Origin of Critical Theory: From Enlightenment to the Frankfurt School • Public Administration Notes by PubAdmin.Institute

Imagine a world where our understanding of society, politics, and culture is not just accepted at face value but is critically analyzed to reveal deeper

pubadmin.institute

View attachment 1071763
View attachment 1071765

DEI was a policy that came about due to the white racism that has been imposed upon non whites for the 249 years this notion has been a country.

 

[ColonelAngus]

No, the OP won't be responding to off-topic bullshit.

Jessie Smollet 2.0, another noose hoax…Allentown City Hall

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/lehighvalley/lehigh-county/allentown-area/allentown-police-secure-search-warrant-to-collect-dna-sample-of-city-worker-in-noose-investigation/article_3dcb0f18-dcfc-11ef-a2c8-fb2bd94997b9.html This race baiting hoax BS is disgusting and reckless. The person...

www.usmessageboard.com

Fake hate crimes have everything to do with DEI.

This person worked in DEI.

LOSES CREDIBILITY.

Why is DEI needed if hate crimes are fake?

 

[jc456]

America is a result of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, and Inclusion. E Pluribus Unum means exactly that. Out of many, one is DEI. But like almost everything else in this nation's history, DEI was fine as long as diverse groups of whites came to this country. Like welfare, which was established in the 1930's and excluded blacks this was a good national goal until non-whites actively tried being included in E PLURIBUS UNUM.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it​

“No president in the United States of America can change the constitution or change law — like the 1964 Civil Rights Act … through executive action or executive order,” said House of Representatives Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Thursday during his weekly press conference. He vowed that Democrats would take the attacks on DEI “head-on” along with civil rights groups.

“The motto of the United States of America is E pluribus unum: Out of many, one. That’s diversity,” said Jeffries.

Jeffries continued, “The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, one of the most important amendments in our country, provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity.” He added, “In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America … and in that pledge, we promise one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for All … that’s inclusion.”

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says DEI is actually rooted in the Constitution — here’s where to find it (Watch)

The House of Representatives minority leader vowed that Democrats would take on the attacks on DEI "head-on" along with civil rights groups.

thegrio.com

perhaps you could explain how equity = equality?

 

[jc456]

Jessie Smollet 2.0, another noose hoax…Allentown City Hall

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/lehighvalley/lehigh-county/allentown-area/allentown-police-secure-search-warrant-to-collect-dna-sample-of-city-worker-in-noose-investigation/article_3dcb0f18-dcfc-11ef-a2c8-fb2bd94997b9.html This race baiting hoax BS is disgusting and reckless. The person...

www.usmessageboard.com

Fake hate crimes have everything to do with DEI.

This person worked in DEI.

LOSES CREDIBILITY.

Why is DEI needed if hate crimes are fake?

I have one question for demofks, if everyone is included in the supposed DEI, then why do we need DEI?

Tell me your justification.

 

[IM2]

Jessie Smollet 2.0, another noose hoax…Allentown City Hall

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/lehighvalley/lehigh-county/allentown-area/allentown-police-secure-search-warrant-to-collect-dna-sample-of-city-worker-in-noose-investigation/article_3dcb0f18-dcfc-11ef-a2c8-fb2bd94997b9.html This race baiting hoax BS is disgusting and reckless. The person...

www.usmessageboard.com

Fake hate crimes have everything to do with DEI.

This person worked in DEI.

LOSES CREDIBILITY.

Why is DEI needed if hate crimes are fake?

DEI Has nothing to do with crime. Start a thread about this if you want my response.

 

[MarathonMike]

DEI was a policy that came about due to the white racism that has been imposed upon non whites for the 249 years this notion has been a country.

More Racist fantasy from the board's leading fantasizer. DEI IS DEAD. DEI personnel will have to get real jobs and favored minorities will be evaluated equally like everyone else.

 

[IM2]

I have one question for demofks, if everyone is included in the supposed DEI, then why do we need DEI?

Tell me your justification.

White do right-wing whites ask stupid questions?

 

[MisterBeale]

DEI was a policy that came about due to the white racism that has been imposed upon non whites for the 249 years this notion has been a country.

Nope, again you are wrong.

Politics is downstream from culture. The Socialists and Marxists realized, they could never subdue America, and likely much of the west, unless they attempted to change the very values of America & Europe.

This is THE WHY of critical theory. It has not a damn thing to do with "diversity, equity or incluseion." It has to do with power. The elites attempt to recreate the ideas out of Orwell, and then put them into practice.

Hell, Al Gore even admitted the truth, when he got the E pluribus unum motto wrong. He reversed it, which is really what DEI is about. It is about dividing a single culture into multiple victim-hood statuses, that the ruling elites pit against each other, using the old divide/rule strategy, to push for anti-America policies.

"E pluribus unum (/iː ˈplɜːrɪbəs ˈuːnəm/ ee PLUR-ib-əs OO-nəm, Classical Latin: [eː ˈpluːrɪbʊs ˈuːnʊ̃], Latin pronunciation: [e ˈpluribus ˈunum]) – Latin for "Out of many, one"[1][2] (also translated as "One out of many"[3]) – is a traditional motto of the United States, appearing on the Great Seal along with Annuit cœptis (Latin for "he approves the undertaking") and Novus ordo seclorum (Latin for "New order of the ages") which appear on the reverse of the Great Seal . . "

E pluribus unum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Diversity Is Not New to America​

By Michael Barone

Diversity Is Not New to America

“You all share the American belief that there is strength in all our differences,” Vice President Al Gore told the Institute of World Affairs in Milwaukee in January 1994. “We can build a collective civic space large enough for all our separate identities, that we can be e pluribus unum — out of...

www.aei.org

". . . . That idea, to put it bluntly, is just plain wrong. In his 1988 book Albion’s Seed, historian David Hackett Fischer has explained in vivid detail how emigrants from different parts of the British Isles brought distinct folkways to the different North American colonies.

Fischer’s book would not have surprised the Founding Fathers. When George Washington took command of the Continental Army in 1775, he immediately noted the differences in attitudes and behavior between New England Yankees and his fellow Virginians. In Federalist No. 60, written in 1788, Alexander Hamilton wrote of the “diversity in the state of property, in the genius, manners, and habits of the people of the different parts of the Union.”

The founders lived when memory was fresh of how religious wars wore apart much of Europe and the British Isles. They knew that Massachusetts was founded by Calvinists, Virginia by Anglicans, Maryland by Catholics, and Pennsylvania by Quakers. The Articles of Confederation they drew up to govern their revolution against Britain purposely gave the states maximum autonomy.

The framers of the Constitution aimed to create a more powerful federal government, but with limited powers. “No religious test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States,” they wrote in Article VI, fully aware of religious tests in Britain and Europe.

“Congress shall make no law regarding an Establishment of religion,” they wrote in the first words of the First Amendment. There would be no state religion in a nation of greater religious diversity than any in Europe. States could choose to abolish established churches, as Virginia did at the urging of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1786, or to maintain them, as New Hampshire did until 1817, Connecticut until 1818, and Massachusetts until 1833.

American ethnic diversity, already apparent in the Hudson Valley Dutch and Pennsylvania Germans, increased in the early 19th century. “Irish and German immigrants fleeing the potato famines of western Europe in the 1840s poured into the Northern states in numbers so enormous” — three times as many proportionate to the preexisting population as in this century — “that a panic arose in Yankee America,” writes historian Robert Kelley, But immigrants were allowed in unless sickly or unable to support themselves. . . "

 

[IM2]

Nope, again you are wrong.

Politics is downstream from culture. The Socialists and Marxists realized, they could never subdue America, and likely much of the west, unless they attempted to change the very values of America & Europe.

This is THE WHY of critical theory. It has not a damn thing to do with "diversity, equity or incluseion." It has to do with power. The elites attempt to recreate the ideas out of Orwell, and then put them into practice.

Hell, Al Gore even admitted the truth, when he got the E pluribus unum motto wrong. He reversed it, which is really what DEI is about. It is about dividing a single culture into multiple victim-hood statuses, that the ruling elites pit against each other, using the old divide/rule strategy, to push for anti-America policies.

"E pluribus unum (/iː ˈplɜːrɪbəs ˈuːnəm/ ee PLUR-ib-əs OO-nəm, Classical Latin: [eː ˈpluːrɪbʊs ˈuːnʊ̃], Latin pronunciation: [e ˈpluribus ˈunum]) – Latin for "Out of many, one"[1][2] (also translated as "One out of many"[3]) – is a traditional motto of the United States, appearing on the Great Seal along with Annuit cœptis (Latin for "he approves the undertaking") and Novus ordo seclorum (Latin for "New order of the ages") which appear on the reverse of the Great Seal . . "

E pluribus unum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Diversity Is Not New to America​

By Michael Barone

Diversity Is Not New to America

“You all share the American belief that there is strength in all our differences,” Vice President Al Gore told the Institute of World Affairs in Milwaukee in January 1994. “We can build a collective civic space large enough for all our separate identities, that we can be e pluribus unum — out of...

www.aei.org

". . . . That idea, to put it bluntly, is just plain wrong. In his 1988 book Albion’s Seed, historian David Hackett Fischer has explained in vivid detail how emigrants from different parts of the British Isles brought distinct folkways to the different North American colonies.

Fischer’s book would not have surprised the Founding Fathers. When George Washington took command of the Continental Army in 1775, he immediately noted the differences in attitudes and behavior between New England Yankees and his fellow Virginians. In Federalist No. 60, written in 1788, Alexander Hamilton wrote of the “diversity in the state of property, in the genius, manners, and habits of the people of the different parts of the Union.”

The founders lived when memory was fresh of how religious wars wore apart much of Europe and the British Isles. They knew that Massachusetts was founded by Calvinists, Virginia by Anglicans, Maryland by Catholics, and Pennsylvania by Quakers. The Articles of Confederation they drew up to govern their revolution against Britain purposely gave the states maximum autonomy.

The framers of the Constitution aimed to create a more powerful federal government, but with limited powers. “No religious test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States,” they wrote in Article VI, fully aware of religious tests in Britain and Europe.

“Congress shall make no law regarding an Establishment of religion,” they wrote in the first words of the First Amendment. There would be no state religion in a nation of greater religious diversity than any in Europe. States could choose to abolish established churches, as Virginia did at the urging of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1786, or to maintain them, as New Hampshire did until 1817, Connecticut until 1818, and Massachusetts until 1833.

American ethnic diversity, already apparent in the Hudson Valley Dutch and Pennsylvania Germans, increased in the early 19th century. “Irish and German immigrants fleeing the potato famines of western Europe in the 1840s poured into the Northern states in numbers so enormous” — three times as many proportionate to the preexisting population as in this century — “that a panic arose in Yankee America,” writes historian Robert Kelley, But immigrants were allowed in unless sickly or unable to support themselves. . . "

I am completely correct. No white racism, no need for DEI.