Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
To protect a corrupt system he’s a member of.Then why, pray tell, didn't Durham charge anyone with any of these crimes?
Durham as special council must follow the orders of the attorney generalThen why didn't Durham charge them?
Then why, pray tell, didn't Durham charge anyone with any of these crimes?
All upper management in the DOJ lied under oathThe first one, Durham got one plea deal to the tune of 400 hours of community service.
And that's literally it.
Durham charged no one with anything else on your list. And certainly didn't convict anyone of them.
Why isn't Jo Biden being investigated for having classified documents at his home office? Documents he had as a senator.Or why did he not put in his report they committed those crimes at a minimum?
Why isn't Jo Biden being investigated for having classified documents at his home office? Documents he had as a senator.
However no one is calling for an investigationGood question. He should be as well as Pence should be.
Mueller and his anti Trump team had nothing. FYI the Durham report contradicts the Mueller report.Durham couldn't make the such charges stick as he couldn't prove any such claims beyond a reasonable doubt.
Even the one case he did manage to get a plea deal for was shaky. Which is why Durham offered 400 hours of community service to settle a felony charge he wasn't confident he could try and win.
And given Durham's absymal record in court, where he lost every trial, Durham was probably right to offer such pat on the wrist.
Mueller found *buckets* of criminal activity when investigating Trump. And got 8 convictions, and over 30 indictments...with most of the folks indicted still at large.
And Mueller managed that in about half the time.
However no one is calling for an investigation
Which they should.
Deep stateOdd isn't it, not even the Repubs are talking about it at all.
Makes me think it is a much wider problem and they do not want to start that ball rolling.
I don't want to heap too much credit on guys like Mueller and Durham, but I suppose it's possible they've gone completely rogue and are still somehow committed to duty and honor and honesty -- in which case there is CLEARLY something WRONG with them -- and wanted to be conservative and not stretch too much.Or why did he not put in his report they committed those crimes at a minimum?
The mueller report was a political witch-hunt packed with liesThe release of the Durham report provides a helpful bookend to the Mueller report, a reminder that two opposing things can exist simultaneously in the universe, and yet another example of how America would benefit if both ends of the spectrum would clean their own fucking house instead of just pointing the finger:
Durham says the FBI essentially engaged in confirmation bias, especially on stories like the Carter Paige FISA request and the Steele Dossier. They went too hard, too fast and too far with available information, and that plays right into the hands of the GQP's ongoing rage against any government agency (unless that agency does something they like, of course, like Comey causing Hillary great harm right before the 2016 elections). So the Durham report is a gift to the GQP and keeps that whole conspiracy culture running at full speed. Way to go, FBI, it looks like you were pretty biased, and that looks like shit. This kind of thing has to fixed and stopped, now.
AT THE SAME TIME, the Mueller report manifested in indictments of +/- 30 people, including REAL RUSSIAN OPERATIVES, securing REAL CONVICTIONS of several Trump associates, from George Papadopolous to Paul Manafort to Mike Flynn to Rick Gates. So clearly there was communication between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and we know that the campaign was asking for Russian assistance on getting dirt on Hillary. Was their actual collusion, where plans were made and carried out? Mueller could not prove that, although he did say that a pursuit of Trump obstruction by Congress would be appropriate.
The final score on this? Yes, the GQP is correct that there was (and maybe is) bias at the FBI, and that makes it perfectly fair to wonder if that's just the tip of the iceberg. And yes, Trump and his campaign leaned on one of our two most dangerous adversaries for help in 2016. This cuts across our entire political spectrum, and denying/ignoring that only makes things worse.
Factbox: People indicted, convicted, investigated in Trump-Russia probe
U.S. President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort agreed to cooperate with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election as part of a plea deal, prosecutors said on Friday.www.reuters.com
DC Courts……Durham couldn't make the such charges stick as he couldn't prove any such claims beyond a reasonable doubt.
Even the one case he did manage to get a plea deal for was shaky. Which is why Durham offered 400 hours of community service to settle a felony charge he wasn't confident he could try and win.
And given Durham's absymal record in court, where he lost every trial, Durham was probably right to offer such pat on the wrist.
Mueller found *buckets* of criminal activity when investigating Trump. And got 8 convictions, and over 30 indictments...with most of the folks indicted still at large.
And Mueller managed that in about half the time.
To protect a corrupt system he’s a member of.
The telling takeaway from Durham is that in spite of the obvious hyper-politicization, weaponization, and corruption his report identifies, he doesn’t call for heads to roll. If you were a victim of these offenses would you tolderate this? If Americans widely knew all that went on, would they tolerate this? In what other profession would this be acceptable?
Mueller and his anti Trump team had nothing. FYI the Durham report contradicts the Mueller report.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump with a crime was “not an option” because of federal rules, but he used his first public remarks on the Russia investigation to emphasize that he did not exonerate the president.Mueller exonerated Trump and his campaign.
apnews.com
Wow. Did Faux not News omit this tidbit?Why isn't Jo Biden being investigated for having classified documents at his home office? Documents he had as a senator.
apnews.com
The obvious answer being?That's a damn good question.
.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump with a crime was “not an option” because of federal rules, but he used his first public remarks on the Russia investigation to emphasize that he did not exonerate the president.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller declared.
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump with a crime was "not an option" because of federal rules, but he used his first public remarks on the Russia investigation to emphasize that he did not exonerate the president.
So when are democrats going to start that investigation on Biden having classified documents in his private office as a senator and vice president?Wow. Did Faux not News omit this tidbit?
Attorney General Merrick Garland announced on Thursday that he was appointing a special counsel, former U.S. attorney Robert Hur, to review the storage of sensitive documents discovered in spaces used by President Joe Biden during the years preceding his return to the White House
Garland appoints special counsel to investigate Biden docs
President Joe Biden has acknowledged that a document with classified markings from his time as vice president was found in his “personal library” at his home in Wilmington, Delaware, along with other documents found in his garage.
