Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Paul Manafort disagrees? I'm shocked. I'm aware that he's going on a publicity tour to rehabilitate his shitty image. I wasn't aware anyone actually believed him.You think so, eh? I'm afraid Paul disagrees. Have you listened to him give HIS side of the affair? I thought so.
Paul Manafort disagrees? I'm shocked. I'm aware that he's going on a publicity tour to rehabilitate his shitty image. I wasn't aware anyone actually believed him.
I'm perfectly happy to prove that the sky is indeed blue (because somehow you missed the circumstances of Manafot's conviction)View attachment 698520
Lookee dat! The guy who demands links (as if everything is read or found on the internet) completely ignores giving any of his own (as usual).
Ya know who else disputed their conviction?Paul Manafort disagrees? I'm shocked. I'm aware that he's going on a publicity tour to rehabilitate his shitty image. I wasn't aware anyone actually believed him.
You know who did get a chance to listen to his side of the story? The jury that convicted him.
On May 13, 2019, then-Attorney General Bill Barr let it be known that at Donald Trump’s “request,” he was conducting an investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation. To conduct this investigation, Barr appointed his very own special prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Durham. For the next three-and-a-half years, Republicans made confident predictions that “Bull” Durham was going to be the man to finally “lock ‘er up.” Surely Durham, unleashed with no deadline, budgetary limit, or constraint on where he looked, would prove conclusively that every conspiracy theory pushed by Trump was true.
But after more than three years and more than $40 million spent, Durham managed to produce just a single charge: accusing Democratic-linked attorney Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI for not revealing secondhand connections to Hillary Clinton’s campaign when talking to them about Donald Trump’s Russia dealings. In May, a jury found Sussman not guilty of the ridiculous charge.
Durham investigation ends after three years of searching, $40 million spent, and nothing found
On May 13, 2019, then-Attorney General Bill Barr let it be known that at Donald Trump’s “request,” he was conducting an investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation. To conduct this investigation, Barr appointed his very own special...m.dailykos.com
Unlimited investigation with no budgetary constraints, or time limit?
Hmm…
Witch hunt!
You said Manafort disagrees he got due process.LEARN TO READ. I asked you if you've listened to his account of what happened not whether he agreed or not. And as usual, you predictably refuse to listen to his account while passing judgement because all the Left care about is OUTCOME.
That's the least shocking thing in the world.I'm afraid Paul disagrees.
Russian collusion was totally proven; U.S. has new intel that Manafort pal gave Trump campaign data to RussiaUm, he completely debunked the "Russian collusion" conspiracy theory. Remember when thats ALL you fucking idiots would talk about for years, and how now NO ONE on the left wants to talk about it anymore? Thats because of Durham's investigation. Are you stupid or something?
I doubt you could prove that.I'm perfectly happy to prove that the sky is indeed blue
Sure. Right after you say? Too bad your credibility is ZERO.Right after you prove that the FBI did what you claim above
That puts him on at least an even keel then with most democrats.Manafort is a crook
He was pardoned by Trump for protecting him.That puts him on at least an even keel then with most democrats.
what crimes?
and Mueller disagrees...with your claims of obstruction
www.pbs.org
i quoted him….Mueller: I did not clear Trump of obstruction of justice
Former Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller told lawmakers Wednesday he could not exonerate President Donald Trump of obstruction of justice and that the president's claims that he had done so in his report are not correct.
Former Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller told lawmakers Wednesday he could not exonerate President Donald Trump of obstruction of justice and that the president’s claims that he had done so in his report are not correct.
WATCH LIVE: Robert Mueller testifies before Congress
“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller declared at the opening of congressional hearings into his investigation of Russian interference to help Trump win the 2016 election.
YES, YOU are a sorry...........................retard.i’m sorry…no president had met with russians? really? you can’t be that stupid
i don’t know the number off hand, dozens. Reagan, Obama, Clinton, Xiden (although he also did that overseas) JFk, LBJ, i could go onYES, YOU are a sorry...........................retard.
How many US presidents met Russians in the oval office?
Behind closed doors?
With no American press allowed?
YES, you really ARE that stupid.
You're, as usual..................FOS.i don’t know the number off hand, dozens. Reagan, Obama, Clinton, Xiden (although he also did that overseas) JFk, LBJ, i could go on
Are you a fucking moron or something? First off, this article is from 2016. Secondly, who the fuck would care if Trump gave Russia his own campaigns internal polling data? He can do whatever he wants with it. Whats next? He shared his favorite lasagna recipe too?Russian collusion was totally proven; U.S. has new intel that Manafort pal gave Trump campaign data to Russia
hahah The 2nd Article of the U.S. Constitution
Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
what are you talkingabout? Flynn took no plea...he with drew his plea....and moreover the Mueller probe never stopped as a result of any thing Flynn did...it stopped when Mueller couldn't find anything.
The J6 hearings are not based on facts.
I doubt you could prove that.
