Dr King Would Have Been A Tea Party Member

[occupied]

nazis are left wing socialists moron.....look at the nazi party platform....you'll see many similarities to the democrat party platfrom....

You mean the people who centralized authority, took the private property of a demonized wealthy group of people, nationalized all industry and labor, practiced eugenics, promoted the abolition of "unearned" income (meaning no interest based profit - anti-capitalism), promoted a massive social security system, federalized education, restricted the press and encouraged religious and racial hatred are just like modern democrooks?

Oh yeah...

That's fuckin' obvious.

I wonder then why every self described Nazi out there would curb stomp you for calling them a leftist? How do explain the disconnect when current Nazis are rightists and the left uniformly hates their racist skinhead guts?

Ask current national socialists what they think of limited government, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution....socialism of the German model of the 1930s-40s was not small, limited government...so it was left wing....not right wing.....

Read some political science that is not written in crayon or vomited out of the mouths of radio talkers.

Yeah...try reading something by someone actually alive at the time....

Recommend something, a contemporary account, that makes the claim that the German Nazi party was leftist. Never have heard of such a claim until just a few years ago when the libertarian right started lumping every bad thing that has ever happened in the history of human governance into "the left".

 

[2aguy]

And this is one of my favorite Tea Party members...I love his videos.....look up Zo Nation on Youtube...

 

[Pete7469]

Yeah...try reading something by someone actually alive at the time....

Funny thing about these bed wetters, they always tell us shit like "go try reading X"...

Problem with that is I was once a lib, so I've read all their psuedointellectual bullshit. Once I grew up (and earned a paycheck) I read things that challenged my programming, I read real history, I read statistics and I drew the conclusion that liberalism is a lie. It's based on a fantasy of utopian pipe dreams written by a criminally insane sociopathic authoritarian who's "utopia" amounts to turning mankind into ants with no individual will or desire to prosper.

All for the collective!!! Hail obozo!!

Weapons grade stupid drones one and all.

 

[rightwinger]

Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,...

Jesus never mentioned those things because they were basically unheard of in those days

History for you began when Obama was elected?

Obozo isn't Jesus.

He is the Messiah

 

[Pete7469]

And this is one of my favorite Tea Party members...I love his videos.....look up Zo Nation on Youtube...

Zo is one of the great voices in modern media. The bed wetters loathe him because he is doing a great job marginalizing them while exposing what truly hateful and envious little bed wetters they are.

 

[occupied]

nazis are left wing socialists moron.....look at the nazi party platform....you'll see many similarities to the democrat party platfrom....

You mean the people who centralized authority, took the private property of a demonized wealthy group of people, nationalized all industry and labor, practiced eugenics, promoted the abolition of "unearned" income (meaning no interest based profit - anti-capitalism), promoted a massive social security system, federalized education, restricted the press and encouraged religious and racial hatred are just like modern democrooks?

Oh yeah...

That's fuckin' obvious.

I wonder then why every self described Nazi out there would curb stomp you for calling them a leftist? How do explain the disconnect when current Nazis are rightists and the left uniformly hates their racist skinhead guts?

Ask current national socialists what they think of limited government, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution....socialism of the German model of the 1930s-40s was not small, limited government...so it was left wing....not right wing.....

Read some political science that is not written in crayon or vomited out of the mouths of radio talkers.

Try some Hayek moron....

Nazism is Socialism


The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National "Socialism" is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the anti-liberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to "socialism of the chair" and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too, as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment, have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because, and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany, many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience.

But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt. A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extent directed against their economic policy.

What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice — their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with "the golden International of Jewish Capitalism."

I do not agree with this because the first people the Nazis killed were leftists, liberals, intellectuals and anyone else who was anti-authoritarian. Also Hayek was a free market zealot and therefore evil.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Dr King Would Have Been A Tea Party Member

I doubt that. He was a supporter of the nanny state and social justice.

 

[2aguy]

You mean the people who centralized authority, took the private property of a demonized wealthy group of people, nationalized all industry and labor, practiced eugenics, promoted the abolition of "unearned" income (meaning no interest based profit - anti-capitalism), promoted a massive social security system, federalized education, restricted the press and encouraged religious and racial hatred are just like modern democrooks?

Oh yeah...

That's fuckin' obvious.

I wonder then why every self described Nazi out there would curb stomp you for calling them a leftist? How do explain the disconnect when current Nazis are rightists and the left uniformly hates their racist skinhead guts?

Ask current national socialists what they think of limited government, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution....socialism of the German model of the 1930s-40s was not small, limited government...so it was left wing....not right wing.....

Read some political science that is not written in crayon or vomited out of the mouths of radio talkers.

Try some Hayek moron....

Nazism is Socialism


The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National "Socialism" is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the anti-liberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to "socialism of the chair" and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too, as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment, have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because, and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany, many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience.

But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt. A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extent directed against their economic policy.

What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice — their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with "the golden International of Jewish Capitalism."

I do not agree with this because the first people the Nazis killed were leftists, liberals, intellectuals and anyone else who was anti-authoritarian. Also Hayek was a free market zealot and therefore evil.

Yes...I have heard that argument...because they killed those like them they couldn't be like those others....gangs kill other gangs for power...the nazis killed off competing leftists for control of Germany...they were national socialists and didn't want the international socialists in charge.......why is that so hard for you lefties to understand..........

Who had Trotsky killed? the other communists......Does that mean Trotsky wasn't a communist, or his killers...?

 

[occupied]

I wonder then why every self described Nazi out there would curb stomp you for calling them a leftist? How do explain the disconnect when current Nazis are rightists and the left uniformly hates their racist skinhead guts?

Ask current national socialists what they think of limited government, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution....socialism of the German model of the 1930s-40s was not small, limited government...so it was left wing....not right wing.....

Read some political science that is not written in crayon or vomited out of the mouths of radio talkers.

Try some Hayek moron....

Nazism is Socialism


The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National "Socialism" is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the anti-liberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to "socialism of the chair" and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too, as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment, have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because, and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany, many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience.

But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt. A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extent directed against their economic policy.

What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice — their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with "the golden International of Jewish Capitalism."

I do not agree with this because the first people the Nazis killed were leftists, liberals, intellectuals and anyone else who was anti-authoritarian. Also Hayek was a free market zealot and therefore evil.

Yes...I have heard that argument...because they killed those like them they couldn't be like those others....gangs kill other gangs for power...the nazis killed off competing leftists for control of Germany...they were national socialists and didn't want the international socialists in charge.......why is that so hard for you lefties to understand..........

Who had Trotsky killed? the other communists......Does that mean Trotsky wasn't a communist, or his killers...?

Authoritarians come in all stripes, claiming the right is incapable of tyranny is stupid and sets you up for your own leaders to lead you down some bad paths. Any sufficiently dogmatic ideology can be used to oppress, there are no exceptions.

 

[J.E.D]

In his LAST speech ever and just a day before his death by the hands of a democrat Dr, King gave a short four and a half minute speech. He did not talk about what the democrats had done to the Negro. No he talked about what democratic government had done to ALL people.

After that he invoked the name of God and Gods word. Democrats killed that man because forty plus years ago he saw what democrats could and would do to a people and a nation.And every word out of his mouth are the VERY issues we are facing today from democrats.

uhh no

What a maroon

 

[kaz]

MLK a republican today... You have lost it...

I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues

Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.

Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.

That Jesus ever advocated government solutions to our problems is retarded. He advocated YOU solution to problems, which Democrats are diametrically opposed to

 

[occupied]

MLK a republican today... You have lost it...

I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues

Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.

Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.

That Jesus ever advocated government solutions to our problems is retarded. He advocated YOU solution to problems, which Democrats are diametrically opposed to

Social programs did not exist in those days but it is dumb to think he would be against anything that mitigated poverty.

 

[rightwinger]

You lefty fools...do you realize that the Tea Party Supported Herman Cain, Mia Love, Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, Niki Haley..........you spend 12 years in democrat controlled schools learning nothing.....except to lie and emote.......

They also supported Allan West and Michele Bachmann

Do you need any more evidence of a whacko fringe?

 

[NYcarbineer]

And here's more.

MLK calling it 'unfortunate and disastrous' that Barry Goldwater was the GOP nominee.

MLK on the Republican Nomination of Barry Goldwater The Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change

This is the ad credited with their split. Oh and it was fear tactics from the SAME people who HAD used the bomb or are YOU going to DENY that as well?

Let me quote some MLK on Goldwater:

"While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. His candidacy and philosophy would serve as an umbrella under which extremists of all stripes would stand."

Happy now?

Religion in American History Martin Luther King on Barry Goldwater Surprising or Otherwise Interesting Primary Sources Part IX

 

[NYcarbineer]

Dr King was never a Republican. His father was at one time but both Dr King and his father supported JFK

Dr King in his OWN words disagrees with you.


Awe you poor slob. HIS family disagrees with you as well.

Nice video of Dr King

I enjoy it when people show what a socially conscious party the Republicans used to be 50 years ago. But your video in no way shows Dr King saying he is a Republican. He supported Kennedy

HE states in the video Republicans have done more for civil rights. HIS family states in the other video he WAS a Republican.
Who do you figure readers will think is telling the truth. You the lying ass wipe of the board OR Dr King AND his family?



I will stand with the man and his family. You take that liberal democratic dictator revised horse shit for history and shove it up your Guno.

Imagine that? Republicans actually doing what is right

Nobody questioned whether northern Republicans supported Civil Rights. So did northern Democrats

But the claim is that Dr King WAS a Republican not that he praised Republicans who supported Civil Rights. Other than his attention whore niece, none of Dr Kings family, especially his own wife, claimed him to be Republican

As I recall, Conservatives claimed Dr King was a Communist...they still do

ALL three generations of King men were Republican according to his family. Are YOU calling them LIARS?

So you're saying the Democrats like Jefferson Davis, Nathan Bedford Forrest, Stonewall Jackson, and Robert E. Lee,

they were the evil men of their time?

 

[rightwinger]

And here's more.

MLK calling it 'unfortunate and disastrous' that Barry Goldwater was the GOP nominee.

MLK on the Republican Nomination of Barry Goldwater The Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change

This is the ad credited with their split. Oh and it was fear tactics from the SAME people who HAD used the bomb or are YOU going to DENY that as well?

Let me quote some MLK on Goldwater:

"While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. His candidacy and philosophy would serve as an umbrella under which extremists of all stripes would stand."

Happy now?

Religion in American History Martin Luther King on Barry Goldwater Surprising or Otherwise Interesting Primary Sources Part IX

Sounds like today's Republicans

They won't say anything racist, but racists flock to them

 

[kaz]

MLK a republican today... You have lost it...

I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues

Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.

Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.

That Jesus ever advocated government solutions to our problems is retarded. He advocated YOU solution to problems, which Democrats are diametrically opposed to

Social programs did not exist in those days but it is dumb to think he would be against anything that mitigated poverty.

Jesus believed in personal responsibility, so yes, he would. And particularly because government doesn't "mitigate" poverty, it institutionalizes it

 

[occupied]

MLK a republican today... You have lost it...

I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues

Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.

Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.

That Jesus ever advocated government solutions to our problems is retarded. He advocated YOU solution to problems, which Democrats are diametrically opposed to

Social programs did not exist in those days but it is dumb to think he would be against anything that mitigated poverty.

Jesus believed in personal responsibility, so yes, he would. And particularly because government doesn't "mitigate" poverty, it institutionalizes it

Whatever lets you sleep at night. Jesus was not fond of rationalizations either. He knows you would rather keep your taxes for your own personal enrichment than feed hungry people.

 

[kaz]

MLK a republican today... You have lost it...

I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues

Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.

Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.

That Jesus ever advocated government solutions to our problems is retarded. He advocated YOU solution to problems, which Democrats are diametrically opposed to

Social programs did not exist in those days but it is dumb to think he would be against anything that mitigated poverty.

Jesus believed in personal responsibility, so yes, he would. And particularly because government doesn't "mitigate" poverty, it institutionalizes it

Whatever lets you sleep at night. Jesus was not fond of rationalizations either. He knows you would rather keep your taxes for your own personal enrichment than feed hungry people.

You are making shit up, and dude, you are terrible at making shit up. It sounds like the result of an Obama, Reid, Pelosi circle jerk.

Christianity, which you know nothing about, is not about keeping people technically alive. It's not charity either when you give other people's money or when their money is removed by force. There is zero in the bible to support that Jesus would advocate that

 

[occupied]

MLK a republican today... You have lost it...

I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues

Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.

Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.

That Jesus ever advocated government solutions to our problems is retarded. He advocated YOU solution to problems, which Democrats are diametrically opposed to

Social programs did not exist in those days but it is dumb to think he would be against anything that mitigated poverty.

Jesus believed in personal responsibility, so yes, he would. And particularly because government doesn't "mitigate" poverty, it institutionalizes it

Whatever lets you sleep at night. Jesus was not fond of rationalizations either. He knows you would rather keep your taxes for your own personal enrichment than feed hungry people.

You are making shit up, and dude, you are terrible at making shit up. It sounds like the result of an Obama, Reid, Pelosi circle jerk.

Christianity, which you know nothing about, is not about keeping people technically alive. It's not charity either when you give other people's money or when their money is removed by force. There is zero in the bible to support that Jesus would advocate that

I had an incredibly strict southern baptist upbringing, I know everything I need to know about christian hypocrisy and how at odds it is with how Jesus apparently wanted us to live. Jesus did not give a damn about money, status, earthly power or any of the shit RW Christians seem to worship these days. He told us to go the extra mile to help out the less fortunate, until you "Christians" start to actually do that we must have social programs to feed people. He said "What you do to the least of you, you do to me". More people are dumping Christianity every day because of how mean and angry it has become, I did it years ago.