So..he compared gay couples with NAMBLA or beastiality. Wonderful.
He simply stated that affirmed perverts shouldn't get to change the definition of marriage....And he's right.
If affirmed perverts want to fight to have "civil unions" recognized by the voters at the STATE level, fine....But in no way should they be allowed to change the definition of true Marriage, which is between a man and a woman, and not two perverts of the same gender, who choose to engage in sexual acts with each other. And seeing as though that two persons of the same gender engaging in sexual acts together is most definitely perversion to the core, as is Pedohilia and Beastiality, then there is no reason they shouldn't be defined as they are.
And, since affirmed perverts known as homosexuals, aren't breaking established laws while engaging in their abject perversions, then they should at least have the opportunity (if they can meet the STATES requirements of putting a measure on the ballot) to have the recognition of CIVIL UNIONS decided by the citizen voters.....Since Pedophiles and those who engage in sexual acts with animals are affirmed perverts who are actually breaking established laws, they should never have the opportunity at having recognized "Civil Unions", let alone Marriages.
Sooooo, there ya' have it, lil' bopete.....Ben Carson is right on this issue.