Don't Worry America Will Survive the Rebuilding Of the East Wing!

JimofPennsylvan

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
955
Reaction score
717
Points
910
President Trump demolishing and rebuilding the east wing of the White House isn't a catastrophe in my eyes contrary to what many Americans think. It would have been much better if he just extended the current east wing south to make room for the thousand person ballroom he believes the nation needs because that would have preserved our nation's history embodied in the current east wing. But that is President Donald Trump he doesn't see the President's role as a steward of America's riches and history and should be careful about only trying to improve things and always show a high degree of care to try not to destroy good things; elections have consequences and this is what the American people chose so we will have to bear it for three more years until President Trump's second term ends! I don't see one major public criticism of the new east wing that it will dwarf the White House itself; the fact that the new east wing's layout will be dramatically larger than the current east wing doesn't mean it dwarfs the White House as long as the height of the new east wing is what it has been purported to be which is about the same height of the current White House. I do buy into the view that the design competes too much with the White House and is in danger of drawing away the majesty and greatness of the White House; to alleviate this problem I would do the following get rid of the Arc windows floor to ceiling go with standard rectangular windows that start three to four feet from the floor and end three to four feet from the ceiling, on the balcony don't hold it up with so many columns hold it up with the same design that holds up the back patio to the White House a wall with arched carve out (all these columns make the new east wing too decorative of a building) and I would get rid of the stylish staircase on the south side of the new east wing again it makes the new building too decorative. The White House is a humble building these changes to the new east wing design would go a long way to conforming the new design to a similar humble building. I don't care about the inside of the new east wing future Presidents can make it more humble or make it more palatial as they see fit! The one thing that I would do is try to hide the east wing construction site it is too gut wrenching watching what is going on there; maybe just install three story poles that could hold up a tarp like fabric that could block the view of the worksite!


On a completely different subject I am really surprised that the media isn't referencing the five hundred pound gorilla in the room over the matter that President Trump wants the Department of Justice to pay him $230 million essentially his legal costs for all the investigations and prosecutions the DOJ put him through over the past nine years. The media should be calling him out for the fact that Donald Trump himself did not pay his legal costs he got most of that money from his campaign account and funding from the Republican Party and solicitations from the public to help him pay his legal costs. On these grounds Donald Trump should not see any reimbursement from the DOJ here. Even on the issue of reimbursements the Trump administration should leave it to the next Presidential administration to resolve this issue because there is way too much of a conflict of an interest here because the people that would currently be making the decision are people President Trump could directly or indirectly have fired so the America public can have no confidence that fairness is being upheld here!
 
President Trump demolishing and rebuilding the east wing of the White House isn't a catastrophe in my eyes contrary to what many Americans think. It would have been much better if he just extended the current east wing south to make room for the thousand person ballroom he believes the nation needs because that would have preserved our nation's history embodied in the current east wing. But that is President Donald Trump he doesn't see the President's role as a steward of America's riches and history and should be careful about only trying to improve things and always show a high degree of care to try not to destroy good things; elections have consequences and this is what the American people chose so we will have to bear it for three more years until President Trump's second term ends! I don't see one major public criticism of the new east wing that it will dwarf the White House itself; the fact that the new east wing's layout will be dramatically larger than the current east wing doesn't mean it dwarfs the White House as long as the height of the new east wing is what it has been purported to be which is about the same height of the current White House. I do buy into the view that the design competes too much with the White House and is in danger of drawing away the majesty and greatness of the White House; to alleviate this problem I would do the following get rid of the Arc windows floor to ceiling go with standard rectangular windows that start three to four feet from the floor and end three to four feet from the ceiling, on the balcony don't hold it up with so many columns hold it up with the same design that holds up the back patio to the White House a wall with arched carve out (all these columns make the new east wing too decorative of a building) and I would get rid of the stylish staircase on the south side of the new east wing again it makes the new building too decorative. The White House is a humble building these changes to the new east wing design would go a long way to conforming the new design to a similar humble building. I don't care about the inside of the new east wing future Presidents can make it more humble or make it more palatial as they see fit! The one thing that I would do is try to hide the east wing construction site it is too gut wrenching watching what is going on there; maybe just install three story poles that could hold up a tarp like fabric that could block the view of the worksite!


On a completely different subject I am really surprised that the media isn't referencing the five hundred pound gorilla in the room over the matter that President Trump wants the Department of Justice to pay him $230 million essentially his legal costs for all the investigations and prosecutions the DOJ put him through over the past nine years. The media should be calling him out for the fact that Donald Trump himself did not pay his legal costs he got most of that money from his campaign account and funding from the Republican Party and solicitations from the public to help him pay his legal costs. On these grounds Donald Trump should not see any reimbursement from the DOJ here. Even on the issue of reimbursements the Trump administration should leave it to the next Presidential administration to resolve this issue because there is way too much of a conflict of an interest here because the people that would currently be making the decision are people President Trump could directly or indirectly have fired so the America public can have no confidence that fairness is being upheld here!
Wow, that was some post.
 
Many past Presidents did things to the People's House.
I mean,dint Obama put in a Bowling alley.
Plus a smallish basketball court.
Other Presidents did major Construction to the
the actual White House.Trump who was a maverick
construction maven merely built a place { a Ball Room }
so other Presidents had a place to entertain and
let other americans move about en masse.
Not to be confused/conflated with a chapel.
Dig Daddios !
 
No one cares. It's the EAST wing! Not even the good wing.

Although it might become the good wing when Trump is done with it.

TDS goes to bed angry and wants up angry.
Makes no nevermind.The now extreme left is totally
opposed to anything Trump does.The pathetic all
female snotrag defined - The View - merely is acting
their unhinged undisciplined bratty best to define for
posterity what brats they be.
 
But that is President Donald Trump he doesn't see the President's role as a steward of America's riches and history ...
Hahahahaha
democrats are hypocrites, liars, clinical mental patients projecting.

democrats preserve america's rich history by rewriting the history books, revisionists

democrats presrrve our rich history by destroying the statues of our founders and other important figures in our history

democrats are here to destroy, nothing more
 
We were never in any danger of those two doing anything to improve America.
Is " danger " the right word.I mean like Obama became a
multi-millionaire.Got a { $ 100 million netflix Post }
plus a $ 65 million book deal w/o ever even submitting a
manuscript.Has the best Mansion { by the water } in
Martha's Vineyard.Plus some deluxe manison in
Hawaii.The worthless skinny prick.
 
Hahahahaha
democrats are hypocrites, liars, clinical mental patients projecting.

democrats preserve america's rich history by rewriting the history books, revisionists

democrats presrrve our rich history by destroying the statues of our founders and other important figures in our history

democrats are here to destroy, nothing more
They have virtually exhausted all their pathetic lies
concerning true-blue american citizens.
I wonder how leftist historians are gonna try and
save this Democrat blight upon history.
 
If the next President decides to fire bomb the White House please list the ways in which your life will be different. That list will have exactly zero things on it.
 
Remember all the howling when Barack put in a basketball court?

Me neither.
Sure, you apparently forgot, or will just dismiss it, it being the pettiness from the RW Media.

The Nature of the Criticism​

Criticism came mostly from conservative commentators and some political columnists, rather than the general public. Their points generally fell into two categories:

1.​

  • Obama’s critics often framed him as being more interested in his personal brand and pop-culture appeal than in the hard work of governance.
  • The basketball court, along with other media-friendly images (like his NCAA March Madness brackets, late-night talk show appearances, and celebrity friendships), was used as an example of this supposed “celebrity” persona.
  • Some pundits claimed that adding a basketball court made the White House look more like a Hollywood-style residence or a celebrity mansion than a seat of government.
  • Right-leaning outlets like The Washington Times and talk radio hosts occasionally portrayed the move as frivolous during an economic crisis.

2.​

  • A smaller set of critics questioned whether taxpayer money was being used for the renovation.
  • Reports later clarified that the upgrades were modest, involving removable basketball hoops, painted lines, and minor surface work — not a full construction project.
  • The White House confirmed that the project was funded through private donations, meaning it didn’t cost taxpayers anything significant (if anything at all).
Once this was clarified, most of the financial criticism faded.
 
If Biden or especially Obama had done this, you guys would never stop howling about it being the un-American destruction of a landmark.
LOL IM2 is projecting Trump Hater Hysteria again. No one with any common sense cares about the East Wing being turned into something better ESPECIALLY when it isn't costing us a DIME OF TAXPAYER MONEY.
 
My Type?

I scream fairness, not Superiority.
I support ALL, don't agree with all, but have no reason to humiliate one that is gay or trans.


You think you know what a true-blue American is?
****, you didn't even capitalize the word 'American'
Today if you're a Democrat then YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.
There is no wiggle room left to accomodate yer slovish
tendencies.
 
15th post
Sure, you apparently forgot, or will just dismiss it, it being the pettiness from the RW Media.

The Nature of the Criticism​

Criticism came mostly from conservative commentators and some political columnists, rather than the general public. Their points generally fell into two categories:

1.​

  • Obama’s critics often framed him as being more interested in his personal brand and pop-culture appeal than in the hard work of governance.
  • The basketball court, along with other media-friendly images (like his NCAA March Madness brackets, late-night talk show appearances, and celebrity friendships), was used as an example of this supposed “celebrity” persona.
  • Some pundits claimed that adding a basketball court made the White House look more like a Hollywood-style residence or a celebrity mansion than a seat of government.
  • Right-leaning outlets like The Washington Times and talk radio hosts occasionally portrayed the move as frivolous during an economic crisis.

2.​

  • A smaller set of critics questioned whether taxpayer money was being used for the renovation.
  • Reports later clarified that the upgrades were modest, involving removable basketball hoops, painted lines, and minor surface work — not a full construction project.
  • The White House confirmed that the project was funded through private donations, meaning it didn’t cost taxpayers anything significant (if anything at all).
Once this was clarified, most of the financial criticism faded.
Nice AI bullshit. Did you tell it to write that?

I don't even remember the basketball court being a story. I certainly don't remember anyone whining about how he's "destroying the White House!" I do remember his NCAA brackets, which I also thought irrelevant.

Meanwhile the MSM is leading with the Trump WH construction story! They think it's just that important.

Nice try though. Your whataboutery has been noted and dismissed.
 
Nice AI bullshit. Did you tell it to write that?

I don't even remember the basketball court being a story. I certainly don't remember anyone whining about how he's "destroying the White House!" I do remember his NCAA brackets, which I also thought irrelevant.

Meanwhile the MSM is leading with the Trump WH construction story! They think it's just that important.

Nice try though. Your whataboutery has been noted and dismissed.
You sheep have spoken......Very Loudly.....but ONLY to your own base.

Let's review.

1). The Tan Suit. The Basketball Court. Terrible, just deplorable. I get it, You HATE the Black POTUS.
2). The Rose Garden...... Yup, let's destroy it. Concrete is so MUCH better.
3). NCAA Brackets..... didn't we all enjoy trying to beat the POTUS?
4). Follow trump or else..............this is the kicker.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom