Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm just wondering if we'll hear the criminal apologists crying that he was "unarmed.". So many back criminals are described as "unarmed"Whether it was a toy gun or real gun
The results would be the same.
I'm just wondering if we'll hear the criminal apologists crying that he was "unarmed.". So many back criminals are described as "unarmed"
This guy got himself killed while robbing these people by an armed customer. The thug was using a toy gun.
Are they gonna say he was unarmed?
View attachment 746340
I'm just wondering if we'll hear the criminal apologists crying that he was "unarmed.". So many back criminals are described as "unarmed"
The guy who posted just below you is kinda claiming thatI don’t see anyone claiming it was not a legitimate shooting
Maybe you can post one
Fuck off duck. You're a moron as well as a commie.The end game is to establish a rule that anybody can shoot and kill another person in America and get away with it.
The publicity over the Rittenhouse murders was the beginning of the slippery slope.
There will be a steep price to pay for this sort of behaviour America!
At the very least it can be said to be a murder on account of the shooter's intent was not to stop the crime in progress, but to fire 10 bullets into the victim for some deviant reason known only to him.The guy who posted just below you is kinda claiming that
What are you looking for? The robber was killed while threatening innocent people with a gun. He died. What more is there?Looked on Youtube.............plenty of videos about this, but none of them showing what happened afterward.
Happened in Houston............figures..........the cancerous asshole of Texas!! I needs to be blown off the face of the planet.
And this is why Canada is an authoritarian shitholeAt the very least it can be said to be a murder on account of the shooter's intent was not to stop the crime in progress, but to fire 10 bullets into the victim for some deviant reason known only to him.
In Canada this would be seen by the authorities as murder or manslaughter at best.
But it's being accepted in America as justice. Or more to the point, gleefully accepted.
And so I had already asked whether or not this is the slippery slope starting at Rittenhouse, to this murder, to the murder of 10 year old black children stealing candy from the corner store?
Yes, I can quite legitimately claim that this is not acceptable in Canada! And I will not suffer the opinion of an American insect who tries to blame communism when hateful capitalism is to blame!
MYOB, duck. This ain't Canada and we really don't give a flying f-k what they would do in Canada. If you don't like what we do in the US, please feel free to stay out of OUR country.In Canada this would be seen by the authorities as murder or manslaughter at best.
It was the media and politicians that rushed to judgement and put the Rittenhouse shootings into the spotlight. By the way, the riot in Kenosha was started after the same group also rushed to judgement after Jacob Blake was shot.The end game is to establish a rule that anybody can shoot and kill another person in America and get away with it.
The publicity over the Rittenhouse murders was the beginning of the slippery slope.
There will be a steep price to pay for this sort of behaviour America!
Canadians can't defend themselves?At the very least it can be said to be a murder on account of the shooter's intent was not to stop the crime in progress, but to fire 10 bullets into the victim for some deviant reason known only to him.
In Canada this would be seen by the authorities as murder or manslaughter at best.
But it's being accepted in America as justice. Or more to the point, gleefully accepted.
And so I had already asked whether or not this is the slippery slope starting at Rittenhouse, to this murder, to the murder of 10 year old black children stealing candy from the corner store?
Yes, I can quite legitimately claim that this is not acceptable in Canada! And I will not suffer the opinion of an American insect who tries to blame communism when hateful capitalism is to blame!
At the very least it can be said to be a murder on account of the shooter's intent was not to stop the crime in progress, but to fire 10 bullets into the victim for some deviant reason known only to him.
In Canada this would be seen by the authorities as murder or manslaughter at best.
But it's being accepted in America as justice. Or more to the point, gleefully accepted.
And so I had already asked whether or not this is the slippery slope starting at Rittenhouse, to this murder, to the murder of 10 year old black children stealing candy from the corner store?
Yes, I can quite legitimately claim that this is not acceptable in Canada! And I will not suffer the opinion of an American insect who tries to blame communism when hateful capitalism is to blame!
The end game is to establish a rule that anybody can shoot and kill another person in America and get away with it.
The publicity over the Rittenhouse murders was the beginning of the slippery slope.
There will be a steep price to pay for this sort of behaviour America!
I don’t see anyone claiming it was not a legitimate shooting
Maybe you can post one
