Don's chances of a successful appeal are not good. Does it matter?

[Carl in Michigan]

Trump Has Few Ways to Overturn His Conviction as a New York Felon​

New York appellate courts rarely overturn a jury decision without evidence of serious errors. The judge in Donald J. Trump’s case closed off many avenues.

“This is long from over,” Donald J. Trump, the former president and current felon, declared on Thursday, moments after a Manhattan jury convicted him on 34 counts of falsifying records to cover up a sex scandal.

Mr. Trump, the first American president to be branded a criminal, is banking on the jury not having the final word on his legal fate or his political fortunes. He will now appeal, both to a higher court and the American people, seeking to contain the fallout as he campaigns for the White House.

But even if the former — and possibly future — president persuades voters to toss his conviction aside, the appellate courts might not be so sympathetic.

Although Mr. Trump proclaimed at a news conference on Friday that he had plenty of ammunition to overturn what he called “this scam,” several legal experts cast doubt on his chances of success, and noted that the case could take years to snake through the courts.

Trump Has Few Ways to Overturn His Conviction as a New York Felon

The judge in Donald J. Trump’s case closed off many avenues of appeal, experts said, though his lawyers might challenge the novel theory at the case’s center.

www.nytimes.com

Talk of an appeal is largely just Kabuki theater by the carnival barker known as The Orange One. It satisfies The Following's psychological need for their favorite felon's absolution but in reality it's really just a way to bash the verdict, and thus the system of justice.

Failure is likely, but does it matter? Surely not to the devoted minions. In their eyes Dear Leader is incapable of committing a crime as evidenced by their collective freak out over 34 unanimous findings of guilt. Unanimous because HE DID IT. He did exactly what he was charged with doing. No amount of mental gymnastics and Orwellian spin can change that. Trump is a convicted felon for a singular reason. HE DID IT.

Nothing will change who I'm gonna vote for. It only emboldens millions of us

 

[Lesh]

Nothing will change who I'm gonna vote for. It only emboldens millions of us

Trump was right

He could shoot someone on Fifth Ave in broad daylight and not lose your support

Yeah.


He said that. And it’s true

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump was right

He could shoot someone on Fifth Ave in broad daylight and not lose your support

Yeah.


He said that. And it’s true

The Dem party lead by corrupt scum really shouldn't run off at the mouth.

 

[22lcidw]

Trump was right

He could shoot someone on Fifth Ave in broad daylight and not lose your support

Yeah.


He said that. And it’s true

We do not believe your laws anymore. Only people benefitting from your agendas do.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Trump was right

He could shoot someone on Fifth Ave in broad daylight and not lose your support

Yeah.


He said that. And it’s true

Maybe find a REAL crime and not a manufactured one and you might get somewhere. Until then get used to the fact it's over for your criminal party

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Just found this

TikTok - Make Your Day

www.tiktok.com

 

[berg80]

Color me encouraged.

Poll: 49% of Independents think Trump should drop out post-guilty verdict
https://www.axios.com/2024/06/01/poll-trump-conviction-election-independent-voters

One in 10 Republicans less likely to vote for Trump after guilty verdict, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/on...-guilty-verdict-reutersipsos-poll-2024-05-31/

Half of Americans think Trump's guilty verdict was correct, should end campaign: POLL
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/plu...verdict-correct-hush-money/story?id=110744698

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Judge Merchan is a Biden donor
Judge Merchan donated to The Progressive Turnout Project
Judge Merchan donated to the organization Stop Trump


.

 

[Winco]

.

And give him money. He's at about $60M in the last couple of days.

.

Did YOU ^^^^ donate?

 

[leftwinger]

On what specific grounds do you think it will be overturned?

read it and weep sheeatbag..

34 REASONS the Bragg-Biden Show Trial Should Have Been TOSSED OUT — Each One Alone Providing Grounds for a Mistrial​

By Paul Ingrassia

34 REASONS the Bragg-Biden Show Trial Should Have Been TOSSED OUT — Each One Alone Providing Grounds for a Mistrial | The Gateway Pundit | by Paul Ingrassia

1. Unconstitutional Gag Order that prevented President Trump from criticizing the trial, exposing the many conflicts that should have forced the judge to recuse himself, and the railroading of his fundamental due process rights.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[leftwinger]

Judge Merchan is a Biden donor
Judge Merchan donated to The Progressive Turnout Project
Judge Merchan donated to the organization Stop Trump


.

Its hard to find anyone working in GOVT anywhere that is NOT a card-carrying Socialist commee-Deep-State DEM.

Appeals too. They can’t toss out every case because a Deep Stater presided over it. They’d be arresting themselves 24-7. We know that won’t happen.

 

[Catsnmeters]

read it and weep sheeatbag..

34 REASONS the Bragg-Biden Show Trial Should Have Been TOSSED OUT — Each One Alone Providing Grounds for a Mistrial​

By Paul Ingrassia

34 REASONS the Bragg-Biden Show Trial Should Have Been TOSSED OUT — Each One Alone Providing Grounds for a Mistrial | The Gateway Pundit | by Paul Ingrassia

1. Unconstitutional Gag Order that prevented President Trump from criticizing the trial, exposing the many conflicts that should have forced the judge to recuse himself, and the railroading of his fundamental due process rights.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Lol, cool cope list.

Those are not grounds for appeal.

Except maybe the statute of limitations. What's funny is you think it's true.

You think Trump and his lawyers are so stupid that they never brought it up once. Not during the grand jury indictment. Not during the arraignment. Not during the trial.

Do you have common sense? Does it make sense to you that one of the most basic laws in existence simply wasn't brought up? Lol.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Its hard to find anyone working in GOVT anywhere that is NOT a card-carrying Socialist commee-Deep-State DEM.

Appeals too. They cant toss out every case because a Deep Stater presided over it.

This needs to be tossed because of his clear conflict of interests. Not even pretending to be unbiased

 

[MagicMike]

Countless legal scholars say you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Hey BluesLegend....just so you know....Janine Pirro and Mark Levine are not exactly legal scholars.

 

[leftwinger]

Lol, cool cope list.

Those are not grounds for appeal.

Except maybe the statute of limitations. What's funny is you think it's true.

You think Trump and his lawyers are so stupid that they never brought it up once. Not during the grand jury indictment. Not during the arraignment. Not during the trial.

Do you have common sense? Does it make sense to you that one of the most basic laws in existence simply wasn't brought up? Lol.

You read all 34 in detail already? you lying sack of human bile.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Hey BluesLegend....just so you know....Janine Pirro and Mark Levine are not exactly legal scholars.

Well, they actually are

 

[Catsnmeters]

You read all 34 in detail already? you lying sack of human bile.

Yeah. I did.

Do you have a problem reading fast?

I don't.

 

[d0gbreath]

Actually less will vote for him. Where do you get these lol dumb ideas? Then in November you'll be like, "But I was told more people were going to vote for Don" when trump loses. You are being fed lies.

We'll be discussing the rigged '24 election for four more years. Comfy as a onesie on the couch.

 

[Drop Dead Fred]

Multiple legal experts have cited multiple legal reasons why Trump’s guilty verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal.

I am listing some of their reasons here, but there are a lot more reasons at the links:

Judges are supposed to be chosen at random. But this judge was selected on purpose.

Judges aren’t supposed to make political donations. But this judge had donated to multiple anti-trump organizations.

The main crime that Trump was convicted of was a misdemeanor, and the statute of limitations had expired. However, the prosecutor updated it to a felony, and used some other crime to avoid the statute of limitations. However, the prosecutor never said what that other crime was. The judge gave the jury instructions that they did not have to vote unanimously when it came to this other crime. The judge gave the jury three separate crimes to choose from, and said they could split their vote, such as, for example, by 4-4-4.

The campaign finance law that Trump was convicted of breaking is a federal law, not a state law. The state has no jurisdiction in this matter.

Here are opinion columns from three different legal experts that explain why there are multiple legal reasons why the verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal:

Alan Dershowitz: “I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, and what I saw shocked me”

I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, and what I saw shocked me

Jonathan Turley: “Bragg’s thrill kill in Manhattan could prove short-lived on appeal”

https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...-manhattan-could-prove-short-lived-on-appeal/

Elie Honig: “Prosecutors Got Trump — But They Contorted the Law”

Prosecutors Got Trump — But They Also Contorted the Law

​

 

[Catsnmeters]

Multiple legal experts have cited multiple legal reasons why Trump’s guilty verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal.

I am listing some of their reasons here, but there are a lot more reasons at the links:

Judges are supposed to be chosen at random. But this judge was selected on purpose.

You have a link with proof right?

I don't think so.

Judges aren’t supposed to make political donations. But this judge had donated to multiple anti-trump organizations.

And was admonished for it.

Doesn't effect this case.

The main crime that Trump was convicted of was a misdemeanor, and the statute of limitations had expired. However, the prosecutor updated it to a felony, and used some other crime to avoid the statute of limitations. However, the prosecutor never said what that other crime was. The judge gave the jury instructions that they did not have to vote unanimously when it came to this other crime. The judge gave the jury three separate crimes to choose from, and said they could split their vote, such as, for example, by 4-4-4.

The parts in bold are mutually exclusive.

You really must have no idea what is going on.

The campaign finance law that Trump was convicted of breaking is a federal law, not a state law. The state has no jurisdiction in this matter.

Trump was charged with falsifying business records.

A state crime.

Here are opinion columns from three different legal experts that explain why there are multiple legal reasons why the verdict is likely to be overturned on appeal:

Alan Dershowitz: “I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, and what I saw shocked me”

I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, and what I saw shocked me

Jonathan Turley: “Bragg’s thrill kill in Manhattan could prove short-lived on appeal”

https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...-manhattan-could-prove-short-lived-on-appeal/

Elie Honig: “Prosecutors Got Trump — But They Contorted the Law”

Prosecutors Got Trump — But They Also Contorted the Law

​

Opinion pieces. That is what your argument boils down too.

I could find opinion pieces on just about anything I want.