Donald Trump still more popular than Biden with American.

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
75,347
Reaction score
16,934
Points
2,180
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.
306-232
Scoreboard.
Shameless.
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...
What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?
You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.
Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.
I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.
You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.
306-232. Scoreboard.
So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?
Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.
Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol
Huh?
You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.
I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.
No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?
Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.
 

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
11,663
Reaction score
6,306
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas
No pressers, no SOTU, no questions, no exposure.... and dozens of EO's that help everyone, except Americans.

The stuttering fuck's weak cowardice is the laughingstock of the planet.

View attachment 463575
Biden is an illegitimate swine and puppet of China and Russia
He has an IQ of about 70
So far , he has obliterated oil industry, small business , the future of women’s sports and the USA is the new Latin America
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,264
Reaction score
2,946
Points
1,893
Donald Trump still more popular than Biden with American.
LIAR! Even Pelosi has a higher favorability rating than lying traitor Tramp!!!!!
Favorability Ratings: U.S. Political Leaders
Can you explain how those polls were taken?
They are from the extreme Right-wing Real Clear Politics site, so you know the favor the GOPQ.
That does not explain how the polls were taken. The Rhinos don't like Trump either and wanted him out. Just ask Cheney's daughter, the daughter of a war criminal.
Who are you calling a war criminal? Cheney re-built America’s depleted intelligence infrastructure. Obama should thank him since he inherited it. Or, a simple “He built that” would be appreciated.
I don't subscribe to the Military Industrial Complex. And that intelligence has been used to spy on our own American citizens and not to mention Cheney's involvement in 911 and forever wars. I could keep going. He is a despicable character along with Obama and all the Neo-Cons and Marxist and Neo-Liberals. They are all scum of the Earth.
 

LAUGHatLEFTISTS

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,784
Points
1,940
Trump was one of our greatest presidents and they want to take the ability away from Biden. Because they don't want him to get pissed because he shit himself and start a nuclear war.
Sure, and Trump weights 236 pounds and he only insulted John McCain's service because he was under the influence of Lysol at the time.

Can I interest you in some beads?
Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.
 

jknowgood

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
38,657
Reaction score
10,193
Points
1,330
Location
South carolina
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.
306-232
Scoreboard.
Shameless.
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...
What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?
You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.
Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.
I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.
You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.
306-232. Scoreboard.
So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?
Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.
Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol
Huh?
You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.
I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.
No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?
Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.
Lol, Acosta? That shithead? They never silenced him, did they? Biden's handlers know he cannot take questions, because he is a demented fool and you're a fool thinking he isn't. Good day!
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
14,157
Reaction score
5,829
Points
390
Donald Trump still more popular than Biden with American.
LIAR! Even Pelosi has a higher favorability rating than lying traitor Tramp!!!!!
Favorability Ratings: U.S. Political Leaders
Can you explain how those polls were taken?
They are from the extreme Right-wing Real Clear Politics site, so you know the favor the GOPQ.
That does not explain how the polls were taken. The Rhinos don't like Trump either and wanted him out. Just ask Cheney's daughter, the daughter of a war criminal.
Who are you calling a war criminal? Cheney re-built America’s depleted intelligence infrastructure. Obama should thank him since he inherited it. Or, a simple “He built that” would be appreciated.
I don't subscribe to the Military Industrial Complex. And that intelligence has been used to spy on our own American citizens and not to mention Cheney's involvement in 911 and forever wars. I could keep going. He is a despicable character along with Obama and all the Neo-Cons and Marxist and Neo-Liberals. They are all scum of the Earth.
Who or What do you like to lead America?
 

j-mac

Nuthin' but the truth
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
5,931
Reaction score
3,285
Points
940
Location
South Carolina
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.
306-232
Scoreboard.
Shameless.
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...
What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?
You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.
Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.
I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.
You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.
306-232. Scoreboard.
So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?
Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.
Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol
Huh?
You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.
I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.
No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?
Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.
Said "reporter" is nothing but a shithead progressive activist who was being disrespectful of the President...he should have had the microphone taken, hell, he should have been escorted from the building...
 

jknowgood

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
38,657
Reaction score
10,193
Points
1,330
Location
South carolina
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.
306-232
Scoreboard.
Shameless.
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...
What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?
You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.
Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.
I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.
You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.
306-232. Scoreboard.
So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?
Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.
Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol
Huh?
You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.
I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.
No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?
Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.
Said "reporter" is nothing but a shithead progressive activist who was being disrespectful of the President...he should have had the microphone taken, hell, he should have been escorted from the building...
Remember when he assaulted the poor girl that was trying to get the microphone away from him?
 

OldBlue

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
489
Reaction score
131
Points
143
Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.
It wasn't meant to be funny.

Rather it was meant to point out the vanity of a large waisted, big assed man of 6'3 pretending to weigh 236lbs and in that effort wearing long winter jackets in the middle of summer to hide his plumpness. It was meant to remind everyone of how a combat dodging coward insulted a war hero who paid a big price in defense of this country, and how a chickenshit bully made humor of the handicapped. Last, I highlighted Trump's stupidity by recalling his utterly insane suggestion to inject Lysol.

There's nothing funny about any of those things. Instead, it's pathetic just as are the cockroaches who hide from what Trump is. They all run when you turn the lights on Trump.

Thanks for being my foil.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
137,374
Reaction score
28,607
Points
2,180
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.
306-232
Scoreboard.
Shameless.
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
BDS!
How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.
More pure BDS!
View attachment 463622
Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.
People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.
Factually incorrect.
Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.
Try again slingblade. LOL
Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.
Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...
What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?
You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.
Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.
I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.
You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.
306-232. Scoreboard.
So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?
Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.
Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol
Huh?
You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.
I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.
No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?
Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.
It was Trump's microphone. Acosta needs to shut his fucking yap when he's told to. He isn't allowed to make speeches or debate with the President. The fact that you condone this kind of thuggish behavior only shows that you're a thug also.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
137,374
Reaction score
28,607
Points
2,180
Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.
It wasn't meant to be funny.

Rather it was meant to point out the vanity of a large waisted, big assed man of 6'3 pretending to weigh 236lbs and in that effort wearing long winter jackets in the middle of summer to hide his plumpness. It was meant to remind everyone of how a combat dodging coward insulted a war hero who paid a big price in defense of this country, and how a chickenshit bully made humor of the handicapped. Last, I highlighted Trump's stupidity by recalling his utterly insane suggestion to inject Lysol.

There's nothing funny about any of those things. Instead, it's pathetic just as are the cockroaches who hide from what Trump is. They all run when you turn the lights on Trump.

Thanks for being my foil.
No one is interested in your smears and bogus accusations against Trump. These talking points (lies) have all been debunked. Everything you morons post is a lie.
 

LAUGHatLEFTISTS

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,784
Points
1,940
Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.
It wasn't meant to be funny.

Rather it was meant to point out the vanity of a large waisted, big assed man of 6'3 pretending to weigh 236lbs and in that effort wearing long winter jackets in the middle of summer to hide his plumpness. It was meant to remind everyone of how a combat dodging coward insulted a war hero who paid a big price in defense of this country, and how a chickenshit bully made humor of the handicapped. Last, I highlighted Trump's stupidity by recalling his utterly insane suggestion to inject Lysol.

There's nothing funny about any of those things. Instead, it's pathetic just as are the cockroaches who hide from what Trump is. They all run when you turn the lights on Trump.

Thanks for being my foil.

Haha......you're boring.
 

OldBlue

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
489
Reaction score
131
Points
143
Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.
It wasn't meant to be funny.

Rather it was meant to point out the vanity of a large waisted, big assed man of 6'3 pretending to weigh 236lbs and in that effort wearing long winter jackets in the middle of summer to hide his plumpness. It was meant to remind everyone of how a combat dodging coward insulted a war hero who paid a big price in defense of this country, and how a chickenshit bully made humor of the handicapped. Last, I highlighted Trump's stupidity by recalling his utterly insane suggestion to inject Lysol.

There's nothing funny about any of those things. Instead, it's pathetic just as are the cockroaches who hide from what Trump is. They all run when you turn the lights on Trump.

Thanks for being my foil.

Haha......you're boring.
I can see your boredom by the effort that you put in your post. My kids use to like Chutes and Ladders when they were toddlers. Have you tried it?
 

beautress

Always Faithful
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Messages
17,755
Reaction score
9,780
Points
1,295
Location
Walker County, TX
That President Trump is the most popular President of the century must be a severe blow to the greatly disdained and unelected unpresidential basement dweller of the deep state worshippers and the press that conned the dupes into cheating at the polls.
 

Mustang

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
1,896
Points
245
Location
39° 44 mins 21 secs N, 104° 59 mins 5 secs W
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
The politician Adolf Hitler is still more famous than the politician and narcissist Donald Trump. No need for him to become more famous. What about a re-education? He could try to become a much more famous mathematician as Euclid once had been and still is. This would be a real challenge for a real genius. Why to waste his time with politics? Trump has better things to do. To play gulf for example, ... mathematically exact.

Trump is history.

While he was president, he relished being the center of attention. He demanded center stage and made sure to make enough outrageous statements on an almost daily bases that the cameras were always focused on him. Now everything has changed. He's no longer the center of attention, regardless of how much he doesn't like it. He's never going to get that kind of attention again unless he runs for president in 2024.

Most Americans are grateful that he's no longer dominating the airwaves. In his place, we now have a president who's more concerned with doing the work than standing in front of cameras and pontificating.
 

beautress

Always Faithful
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Messages
17,755
Reaction score
9,780
Points
1,295
Location
Walker County, TX
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
The politician Adolf Hitler is still more famous than the politician and narcissist Donald Trump. No need for him to become more famous. What about a re-education? He could try to become a much more famous mathematician as Euclid once had been and still is. This would be a real challenge for a real genius. Why to waste his time with politics? Trump has better things to do. To play gulf for example, ... mathematically exact.

Trump is history.

While he was president, he relished being the center of attention. He demanded center stage and made sure to make enough outrageous statements on an almost daily bases that the cameras were always focused on him. Now everything has changed. He's no longer the center of attention, regardless of how much he doesn't like it. He's never going to get that kind of attention again unless he runs for president in 2024.

Most Americans are grateful that he's no longer dominating the airwaves. In his place, we now have a president who's more concerned with doing the work than standing in front of cameras and pontificating.
Thank you for sleepwalking through Trump's amazing speech at Cpac this week. And his history is one of winning the favor of every day American people who are determined to make America great again! :yes_text12:
 

LAUGHatLEFTISTS

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,784
Points
1,940
Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.
It wasn't meant to be funny.

Rather it was meant to point out the vanity of a large waisted, big assed man of 6'3 pretending to weigh 236lbs and in that effort wearing long winter jackets in the middle of summer to hide his plumpness. It was meant to remind everyone of how a combat dodging coward insulted a war hero who paid a big price in defense of this country, and how a chickenshit bully made humor of the handicapped. Last, I highlighted Trump's stupidity by recalling his utterly insane suggestion to inject Lysol.

There's nothing funny about any of those things. Instead, it's pathetic just as are the cockroaches who hide from what Trump is. They all run when you turn the lights on Trump.

Thanks for being my foil.

Haha......you're boring.
I can see your boredom by the effort that you put in your post. My kids use to like Chutes and Ladders when they were toddlers. Have you tried it?
Hey buddy, I'm going to throw you a bone here. Stop trying to be funny. Its tedious and boring.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
137,374
Reaction score
28,607
Points
2,180
After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555
The politician Adolf Hitler is still more famous than the politician and narcissist Donald Trump. No need for him to become more famous. What about a re-education? He could try to become a much more famous mathematician as Euclid once had been and still is. This would be a real challenge for a real genius. Why to waste his time with politics? Trump has better things to do. To play gulf for example, ... mathematically exact.

Trump is history.

While he was president, he relished being the center of attention. He demanded center stage and made sure to make enough outrageous statements on an almost daily bases that the cameras were always focused on him. Now everything has changed. He's no longer the center of attention, regardless of how much he doesn't like it. He's never going to get that kind of attention again unless he runs for president in 2024.

Most Americans are grateful that he's no longer dominating the airwaves. In his place, we now have a president who's more concerned with doing the work than standing in front of cameras and pontificating.
You mean most brain damaged idiots are grateful. When you demonstrate the ability to read minds, perhaps someone will take your obvious horseshit seriously
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top