Donald Trump Runs From Courthouse With His Tail Between His Legs After Epic Beat Down

[BackAgain]

I will not be bullied. And so Mr. Trump is no longer here. The Donald Trump show is over. This was nothing more than a political stunt."

'Trump show is over': Attorney General Letitia James lashes out at former president's 'political stunt'

New York Attorney General Letitia James left the Manhattan courthouse Wednesday to tell the press that Donald Trump had left the building and was not expected to attend any more of his fraud trial.She addressed his attacks on her and on others, but said that those attacks wouldn't be able to...

www.rawstory.com

And off to Cletisville he goes

It certainly is a fraudulent trial.

 

[Catsnmeters]

It certainly is a fraudulent trial.

It's not a trial silly. He has already been found guilty. This is just to determine the punishment.

Try to keep up.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This isn't a criminal case, it's a civil case.

The case has already been decided. They are just trying to assertain the punishment.

If it was a criminal trial, and had not already been decided, Trump still can be removed from the courtroom.

(b) In General. A defendant who was initially present at trial, or who had pleaded guilty or nolo contendere, waives the right to be present under the following circumstances:

(1) In General. A defendant who was initially present at trial, or who had pleaded guilty or nolo contendere, waives the right to be present under the following circumstances:

(A) when the defendant is voluntarily absent after the trial has begun, regardless of whether the court informed the defendant of an obligation to remain during trial;

(B) in a noncapital case, when the defendant is voluntarily absent during sentencing; or

(C) when the court warns the defendant that it will remove the defendant from the courtroom for disruptive behavior, but the defendant persists in conduct that justifies removal from the courtroom.

Rule 43. Defendant's Presence

www.law.cornell.edu

Rarely have I seen a post fail on so many levels. Can you do me a favor and link the right wing blog that fed you this information so that I can help you identify when you are likely being lied too?

Whose the victim?

 

[BackAgain]

It's not a trial silly. He has already been found guilty. This is just to determine the punishment.

Try to keep up.

Nobody has been found “guilty,” stupid saince this was never a criminal trial in the first place.

Plus, of course, you’re wrong anyway. Of course this is a trial. What you ignorantly and incorrectly referred to as a “guilty” verdict wasn’t a verdict OR determination of liability. It was a ruling on some motions ahead of trial.

Please stop babbling from your abundant supply of ignorance.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Whose the victim?

Doesn't matter.

A victim is not required.

Repeating what right wing bloggers told you makes you look dumb.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Doesn't matter.

A victim is not required.

Repeating what right wing bloggers told you makes you look dumb.

Yes the identity of the victim matters.
And yes a victim is required

 

[BackAgain]

Doesn't matter.

A victim is not required.

Repeating what right wing bloggers told you makes you look dumb.

Denying reality confirms that you are dumb. But really, no additional confirmation is required.

In reality, both in civil law and in criminal law there does have to be a victim of some effort to deceive for any liability to commit fraud by a defendant.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Nobody has been found “guilty,” stupid saince this was never a criminal trial in the first place.

I understand that. He was found guilty n the civil trial.

Plus, of course, you’re wrong anyway. Of course this is a trial. What you ignorantly and incorrectly referred to as a “guilty” verdict wasn’t a verdict OR determination of liability. It was a ruling on some motions ahead of trial.

Ok. Fair point. He was found liable, not guilty.

That said, the decision has been made. All that's left is determine the damages.

Please stop babbling from your abundant supply of ignorance.

 

[Hollie]

I agreed with your opinion. Lol, good grief.


Why is an impeachment inquiry a banana republic? You do realize impeachments are conditional, right?

He isn't exempt. Just no evidence that justifies indictments. If they find that evidence, I will support his impeachment.

An impeachment inquiry wherein the Dem / Socialist controlled justice department becomes a primary arm to obstruct the process of discovery is a classic sign of a banana republic. Persecution of political rivals is a pattern that describes banana republics and the Stalinist / Leninist Era.

Obstructionist and corrupt perfectly describes the flunkies in the Biden ''justice department'' who are mere minions to be told what to do.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Denying reality confirms that you are dumb. But really, no additional confirmation is required.

In reality, both in civil law and in criminal law there does have to be a victim of some effort to deceive for any liability to commit fraud by a defendant.

No. They do not.

Where does it require harm?

 

[bodecea]

View attachment 838263

View attachment 838264

View attachment 838265

View attachment 838266

View attachment 838267

View attachment 838271

And your proof those are all his rallies?

BTW....how many people would you estimate in all those pictures if they are valid? Give us an estimate.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

this one beats his dog if trump is mentioned...lol

That's terrible

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No. They do not.

View attachment 838304
Where does it require harm?

You must have a victim in a civil suit.

 

[toobfreak]

And your proof those are all his rallies?

Idiot, some of those rallies were taken right off live TV, others you can SEE the Trump signs in them, one was taken from a Trump rally in Butler, Pa, and one has the actual caption of the event from the TV station right in the corner. I can give you many more!

Then there was the rally in India where around 120,000 showed up. Need a picture of it?

BTW....how many people would you estimate in all those pictures if they are valid? Give us an estimate.

About 90 million. Happy, asshole? How pathetic that now the left have come to denying common Trump rally photos because they can neither deny Trump's popularity nor support Biden.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

They say most "Trump haters" will develop cancer of the ass.....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They say most "Trump haters" will develop cancer of the ass.....

And throat

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Did you not read what I posted? They can be ejected from the courtroom.

Not to mention their are no witnesses. The case is over. It's already been decided. Trump is guilty. They are simply determining the punishment.

The charge does not require a victim. Where are you getting your information? You have no clue what is actually going on do you? Just mindless parroting of blogs.

One final question. How do you know Trump was kicked out of the courtroom instead of leaving on his own?

The crooked DA said so.
The charge is fraud. Without a defrauded party. Uh huh. There are certainly witnesses. The judge doesn't like cross examination.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Why? Trump is being held accountable for fraud. What's wrong with that?

No defrauded party.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Good move. Now political prisoners cannot be present at trial. It's moving right into the medieval.

He's allowed to be there. He's just not allow to go around attacking people.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

He's allowed to be there. He's just not allow to go around attacking people.

He will just have to attack them anyway.