Information isnt Advocacy
- Aug 5, 2010
- Reaction score
- Peaking out from the redwoods
There wasn't enough fraud to swing the election, period. YouThat’s the point. There is zero evidence of widespread fraud. Zero!Of course we know. It was investigated by Twice Impeached Trump’s own Department of Justice.
“to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.” ~ William Barr, former Attorney General
Which is dumb. It is silly to think that all fraud was found.
The point is the widespread fraud is done for a reason. TO effect an outcome in the election.
Evidence of widespread fraud indicates the need for more information.
Funny. The quote was that there was not evidence of enough fraud to swing the election.
Yet you either failed to read that properly or your brain lied to you, (confirmation bias) to protect your fragile world view.
My point stands. The point of fraud is to swing the election. If we see evidence of fraud, then an investigation to see how much more there was that was not found, in the rushed initial look, is reasonable.
Just assuming that what you see is all there is, is madness.
This country is like a man waking in bed and seeing smoke building up on the ceiling, and going back to sleep because, just a little smoke, is not proof of fire somewhere.
You don't even have smoke. The evidence of fraud doesn't even amount to a lit cigarette which is why Trump and his merry band of whacked out "lawyers" had over 60 chances to provide evidence and could not.
You fell for the big lie.