Donald Trump Departs For Appeal Hearing In E. Jean Carroll Case

[ChristisKing]

Well I guess that answers that question. These absurd legal claims are still going on. It's sort of funny that all of this stopped before the assassination attempt and then after it failed and the media forgot about it it all started again.

 

[odanny]

That's nice, dear.

 

[ChristisKing]

That's nice, dear.

So you got nothing huh? It seems like your party truly is going back to the drawing board.

 

[rightwinger]

Trumps Defense

I don’t know that woman
I am a celebrity
I grab so many women by the ***** that you can’t expect me to remember all of them

 

[odanny]

Trumps Defense

I don’t know that woman
I am a celebrity
I grab so many women by the ***** that you can’t expect me to remember all of them

Don't forget "I was President, I have immunity!"

 

[Blaster]

Well I guess that answers that question. These absurd legal claims are still going on. It's sort of funny that all of this stopped before the assassination attempt and then after it failed and the media forgot about it it all started again.

It was a she said, he said trial with the jury believing her despite there being no evidence.

 

[rightwinger]

It was a she said, he said trial with the jury believing her despite there being no evidence.

Harris provided a detailed account of the event in the Dressing Room and explained where she had met Trump

Trump denied ever seeing her, denied meeting her at the store, claimed she is not his type……even when presented with a picture of them together and thinking she was his ex wife

For some reason, the jury found Carrol’s story more believable

 

[john doe 101]

Well I guess that answers that question. These absurd legal claims are still going on. It's sort of funny that all of this stopped before the assassination attempt and then after it failed and the media forgot about it it all started again.

Didnt you threaten the VP on here recently? You're a sick person.

 

[john doe 101]

Trump is back at it saying the same things that got him into trouble twice and causing him to owe E Jean Carroll a bunch of money. Hope she sues him a third time. Maybe she will own the failing Truth Social by the end of all this and shut it down.

 

[WEATHER53]

Convicted from yet Another woman who remembers no details other than “It’s him” and said nothing for 25 years.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Well I guess that answers that question. These absurd legal claims are still going on. It's sort of funny that all of this stopped before the assassination attempt and then after it failed and the media forgot about it it all started again.

Trump's a busy little adjudicated sexual assaulter.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trumps Defense

I don’t know that woman
I am a celebrity
I grab so many women by the ***** that you can’t expect me to remember all of them

Carrol’s case:

I can’t remember when it happened
I can’t remember any details about it
I don’t have any evidence
I have no witnesses
The story I told just so happens to be the plot of my favorite television show episode

 

[rightwinger]

Carrol’s case:

I can’t remember when it happened
I can’t remember any details about it
I don’t have any evidence
I have no witnesses
The story I told just so happens to be the plot of my favorite television show episode

Carrol gave a detailed description of how she met Trump and what happened in the Dressing Room. She had described it to others years ago.

Meanwhile, Trump said he didn’t know her, she is “not his type” and bragged about grabbing women by the *****.

Guess who the jury believed?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Carrol gave a detailed description of how she met Trump and what happened in the Dressing Room. She had described it to others years ago.

Meanwhile, Trump said he didn’t know her, she is “not his type” and bragged about grabbing women by the *****.

Guess who the jury believed?

The jury didn’t believe anything because the bar for conviction in this case wasn’t based on belief, it was based on possibility. Preponderance of evidence doesn’t mean you have to believe they actually committed the crime, just that you think it’s possible.

I mean, given the right jury in the right city, you could use that standard to convict anyone of anything.

The fact that the jury convicted him on literally zero evidence is proof that not even the bare minimum of proof was required.

In this trial, Carroll couldn’t remember the year it took place.

 

[rightwinger]

The jury didn’t believe anything because the bar for conviction in this case wasn’t based on belief, it was based on possibility. Preponderance of evidence doesn’t mean you have to believe they actually committed the crime, just that you think it’s possible.

I mean, given the right jury in the right city, you could use that standard to convict anyone of anything.

The fact that the jury convicted him on literally zero evidence is proof that not even the bare minimum of proof was required.

In this trial, Carroll couldn’t remember the year it took place.

Problem for Trump is that he can’t stop lying
His testimony destroys his credibility

I don’t know that woman and “she is not my type” was quickly shot down

 

[ThisIsMe]

Problem for Trump is that he can’t stop lying
His testimony destroys his credibility

I don’t know that woman and “she is not my type” was quickly shot down

As far as “type”, how could anyone but Trump be able to determine this? Lol

As far as “knowing” someone, he may have taken a picture with someone, that doesn’t mean you know them. They may have even run into each other once or twice, that still doesn’t mean you know them.

Still, even if he did know her, she wasn’t able to ever prove he had any physical, sexual contact with her.

 

[rightwinger]

As far as “type”, how could anyone but Trump be able to determine this? Lol

As far as “knowing” someone, he may have taken a picture with someone, that doesn’t mean you know them. They may have even run into each other once or twice, that still doesn’t mean you know them.

Still, even if he did know her, she wasn’t able to ever prove he had any physical, sexual contact with her.

The jury had a choice to believe Carrol or Trump

Trump lost

 

[ThisIsMe]

The jury had a choice to believe Carrol or Trump

Trump lost

Yep, this is true, the news shows this, that doesn’t mean they were right.

 

[rightwinger]

Yep, this is true, the news shows this, that doesn’t mean they were right.

Trump……I’m a celebrity, I just grab them by the *****
Didn’t help

 

[martybegan]

Harris provided a detailed account of the event in the Dressing Room and explained where she had met Trump

Trump denied ever seeing her, denied meeting her at the store, claimed she is not his type……even when presented with a picture of them together and thinking she was his ex wife

For some reason, the jury found Carrol’s story more believable

Or they despised Trump.

She couldn't remember when it happened.