Dominion wins Big League against Fox

He's arguing that the judge didn't read the evidence. That's the same claim they made after Trump lost over 60 election lawsuits.

They just can't believe that election fraud claims had no evidence to back them up.

The fact is that Fox provided no evidence supporting their claims about Dominion

Easy to decide
 
The judge reviewed what was submitted. You don’t have the slightest clue about how much he saw from Fox News.

You lied. And you got caught.

What else is new, ya libturd?

Yes he did
And with Fox failing to provide any evidence in support of their claims against Dominion, it was easy to decide

You lose again Skippy
 
This is where you're absolutely wrong. The judge by law has to review everything that Fox News submitted.

Rule 56. Summary Judgment

(a) Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment. A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense — or the part of each claim or defense — on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.

The Judge issued a 130 page decision explaining the reasons. What is your next complaint?
 
The fact is that Fox provided no evidence supporting their claims about Dominion

Easy to decide
Actually it's even worse. The evidence Fox News presented, such as the depositions by their on-air personnel, and from Rupert Murdoch and other Fox News executives, , was the same undisputed evidence of deliberately lying.

That's why the judge under Rule 56 could come up with a summary judgement as to whether Fox News lied.
 
how much if any harm Dominion suffered

What harm could they possibly suffer? They are not a normal business. The have near exclusive rights with our government to use their software and equipment for counting votes. The only harm they could suffer would be if the government itself decided to stop using them. Why do they refuse to let others examine their code to see if it is aboveboard?
 
Yes he did
And with Fox failing to provide any evidence in support of their claims against Dominion, it was easy to decide

You lose again Skippy
Prove you have the first fucking basis to make the claim about what Fox News did or didn’t submit.

You won’t though because you’re just busy now defending your lie bu repeating it, you fucktarded troll hack.

It’s ok, Leftwhiner. Every seasoned veteran of USMB Knows you’re full of shit.
 
Prove you have the first fucking basis to make the claim about what Fox News did or didn’t submit.

You won’t though because you’re just busy now defending your lie bu repeating it, you fucktarded troll hack.

It’s ok, Leftwhiner. Every seasoned veteran of USMB Knows you’re full of shit.
My basis is the judge who reviewed every claim by Fox and found it without merit
Otherwise, they would have been allowed to go to trial with it

You lose again Skippy
 
What harm could they possibly suffer? They are not a normal business. The have near exclusive rights with our government to use their software and equipment for counting votes. The only harm they could suffer would be if the government itself decided to stop using them. Why do they refuse to let others examine their code to see if it is aboveboard?
You've hit the nail on the head. Dominion suffered loss of business because due to fox news false accusations, many governments either dropped dominion, or didn't buy from dominion for the next upcoming election.

How many contracts dominion lost, and how many they would have otherwise gotten is the $1.6 bilion question.
 
Last edited:
What harm could they possibly suffer? They are not a normal business. The have near exclusive rights with our government to use their software and equipment for counting votes. The only harm they could suffer would be if the government itself decided to stop using them. Why do they refuse to let others examine their code to see if it is aboveboard?
independent auditors with voting machine expertise, hired by the state, do evaluate it. And independent companies, hired by the state, with voting machine expertise, certify them. It is part of the secure voting process in place....?
 
My basis is the judge who reviewed every claim by Fox and found it without merit
Otherwise, they would have been allowed to go to trial with it
That’s merely a recapitulation of his determination. It is not even akin to proof that you know what Fox News provided to the court. You keep highlighting the fact that you are a hopeless liar. You’ve been caught and exposed again.

Accept your defeat like the man you’re not.
 
Prove you have the first fucking basis to make the claim about what Fox News did or didn’t submit.

We have an adversarial legal system. Your point seems to be that you think that Fox News lawyers didn't bother to submit any evidence to defend the lawsuit.

Well that could have happened. But i'm sure Fox News has enough lawyers, that if their legal strategy was to just wave the white flag, that they would have switched to lawyers who would actually submit evidence in their defense.
 
That’s merely a recapitulation of his determination. It is not even akin to proof that you know what Fox News provided to the court. You keep highlighting the fact that you are a hopeless liar. You’ve been caught and exposed again.

Accept your defeat like the man you’re not.

If Fox had FACTS they would have presented them on their broadcasts

You lose again Skippy
 
independent auditors with voting machine expertise, hired by the state, do evaluate it. And independent companies, hired by the state, with voting machine expertise, certify them. It is part of the secure voting process in place....?
This is where they're talking about an "Intellectual property" invasion is their "gotcha". That their evaluation of dominions systems is based on rigorous testing. And not on getting access to all the source code for the programs the system runs.

Instead of tasting KFC chicken to tell if it's good, they want to know the secret recipe, and if they won't hand it over, claim they're hiding something evil.
 
So you claim. But you don’t know what they provided to the judge. And that’s the point.

Absolutely. They could have defended the lawsuit by submitting a one page reply, saying "We give up!"

And that's all the evidence the judge had from Fox News. But lets be serious. Lawyers failing to raise a vigorous defense would be fired, sanctioned, or disbarred.
 
Backagains argument seems to boil down to a speculation that fox news lawyers were completely negligent, and failed to submit a defense.

Thus the judge had little or no evidence from Fox News in rendering his judgement.

And we have no way to prove that Fox's lawyers, actually did their job.
 
Dominion suffered loss of business because due to fox news false accusations, many governments either dropped dominion, or didn't buy from dominion

LIST? Sworn affidavits? Maybe they should be more aboveboard with their product to avoid such problems in the future. Frankly, they are lucky they are still in business at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top