Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Their product was thoroughly tested by private auditors. And certified accurate and reliable. It's no different than the latest micro-processor from Intel. You can test it for flaws, but you can't demand that Intel tell you the details of how they made it.LIST? Sworn affidavits? Maybe they should be more aboveboard with their product to avoid such problems in the future. Frankly, they are lucky they are still in business at all.
I didn’t lose. As you knew when you just lied again.
Your floundering is duly noted, again.
I didn’t lose. As you knew when you just lied again.
Your floundering is duly noted, again.
Your fail is actually complete, but feel free to continue posting to re-confirm it.
You never really had a chance
Your claim that you can’t judge Fox’s defense without reading every piece of evidence was Dead on Arrival
Baseless? His claim was based on the Judge actually following the law when he issued a judgement on motion.Not a claim I made. As you knew when you tripled down on your lie. Instead, as you know, what i did was challenge your baseless claim. And as expected, you couldn’t back it up.
That is like me telling you that millions of votes in 2020 were certified illegal by private auditors and certified fraudulent. And they certified themselves 100% accurate!Their product was thoroughly tested by private auditors. And certified accurate and reliable.
Sure you can, they give you all the specs. But a chip is not in question, it is the SOFTWARE that runs these machines.It's no different than the latest micro-processor from Intel. You can test it for flaws, but you can't demand that Intel tell you the details of how they made it.
That’s merely a recapitulation of his determination. It is not even akin to proof that you know what Fox News provided to the court. You keep highlighting the fact that you are a hopeless liar. You’ve been caught and exposed again.
Accept your defeat like the man you’re not.
What harm could they possibly suffer? They are not a normal business. The have near exclusive rights with our government to use their software and equipment for counting votes. The only harm they could suffer would be if the government itself decided to stop using them. Why do they refuse to let others examine their code to see if it is aboveboard?
Not the point. The point was simply that Leftwhiner lied again. He made a claim but can’t support it because he has no basis of information to support it.If Fox presented the information, it was considered by the Judge. If they didn’t present it, the loss on the decision is their own fault.
It's no different than the latest micro-processor from Intel. You can test it for flaws, but you can't demand that Intel tell you the details of how they made it.
Intel micro-processors run on internal software called "micro-code", And their math units have internal data tables that are like the software they run on.Sure you can, they give you all the specs. But a chip is not in question, it is the SOFTWARE that runs these machines.
The protect the code for the same reason your automaker does. If the code gets out an exploit could be found. Imagine someone getting the code and actually doing what you accuse them of doing.
well you seem to have forgotten what Trump saidBiden said you wouldn't get covid if you got vaccinated.
www.cnn.com
Actually by knowing exactly how something is made, allows people to exploit any flaw it might have. Whether it's a car, a micro-processor, or a voting machine.It shouldn't take a secret computer code just to tally up election ballots. The more you complicate something, the more backdoors you create for cheating.
Actually by knowing exactly how something is made, allows people to exploit any flaw it might have. Whether it's a car, a micro-processor, or a voting machine.
The chapman lock was supposed to make a car unstealable, but they were able to defeat it, knowing how it was made, and you don't see them in use any more because of it.
They already did. By state certified auditors, who testing the machine according to state procedures for certification of equipment.All I'm asking is for a chance for people to examine and test USING the machines, not do a line by line code analysis.
I tried to tell you.All media is fucked. They have all lied almost all the time. Believing any of them is a crap shoot and crap is the prize.
That's the problem. I don't trust the state. So I don't trust who they certify.They already did. By state certified auditors, who testing the machine according to state procedures
I just said above that I wasn't asking for that. I have video of one polling station testing one of these things and finding serious concerns and discrepancies in the counts and outcome.Your request for line by line code analysis
It shouldn't take a secret computer code just to tally up election ballots. The more you complicate something, the more backdoors you create for cheating.
We protect the code for our encryption software. Even though this code is useless without the daily random key, we still protect it.
Chevrolet protects the code for the computer components in a car.
Coke still hasn’t told anyone the recipe for their signature product.
Coca-Cola formula - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Now if the software is released and someone figures out how to hack it, the company ceases to exist don’t they? You just detest them and demand that they commit corporate suicide.
Then you can never trust an outside contractor, including the one who claimed to find a flaw in the machines.That's the problem. I don't trust the state. So I don't trust who they certify.
