Dominion Execs Back Out Of Hearing In PA And Are Now In Hiding.....Some Offices Closed

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Congress does have an obligation to find out exactly what happened therefore all results are void until the real outcome is found

No they don't. As elections are conducted by STATES.
So, you do believe in the right of the state to conduct its elections?...right?
Or is the answer no...because my great white hope got shown the door?
FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS do apply

Of course. But the feds don't interfere with the state right to hold an election.
So far, federal and individual state election officials have said there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Nothing to investigate. There is no "real" outcome.
The outcome is that Donald Trump lost. Because he was a terrible President.
End of story.
 
Looks like Dominion is lawyering up and trying to relocate so they can escape prosecution.


View attachment 419563



These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.


  • Overall, we rate Just the News Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to four failed fact checks over a short period of time.
being biasis never stops you from using ABC CBS NBC CNN FOX NEWS MSNBC WAPO and any number of the 90% democrat controlled media
 
They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Congress does have an obligation to find out exactly what happened therefore all results are void until the real outcome is found

No they don't. As elections are conducted by STATES.
So, you do believe in the right of the state to conduct its elections?...right?
Or is the answer no...because my great white hope got shown the door?
FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS do apply

Of course. But the feds don't interfere with the state right to hold an election.
So far, federal and individual state election officials have said there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Nothing to investigate. There is no "real" outcome.
The outcome is that Donald Trump lost. Because he was a terrible President.
End of story.
when fraud is in question I assure you they do have the authority to step in
 
They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Congress does have an obligation to find out exactly what happened therefore all results are void until the real outcome is found

No they don't. As elections are conducted by STATES.
So, you do believe in the right of the state to conduct its elections?...right?
Or is the answer no...because my great white hope got shown the door?
FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS do apply

Of course. But the feds don't interfere with the state right to hold an election.
So far, federal and individual state election officials have said there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Nothing to investigate. There is no "real" outcome.
The outcome is that Donald Trump lost. Because he was a terrible President.
End of story.
when fraud is in question I assure you they do have the authority to step in

No federal election official (involved in the actual election) has stated there is voter fraud or machine error involved here. And no, the Trump's appointed head of the FEC doesn't count.
 
They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Congress does have an obligation to find out exactly what happened therefore all results are void until the real outcome is found

No they don't. As elections are conducted by STATES.
So, you do believe in the right of the state to conduct its elections?...right?
Or is the answer no...because my great white hope got shown the door?
FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS do apply

Of course. But the feds don't interfere with the state right to hold an election.
So far, federal and individual state election officials have said there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Nothing to investigate. There is no "real" outcome.
The outcome is that Donald Trump lost. Because he was a terrible President.
End of story.
when fraud is in question I assure you they do have the authority to step in

No federal election official (involved in the actual election) has stated there is voter fraud or machine error involved here. And no, the Trump's appointed head of the FEC doesn't count.
fake news doesn't mean anything
and your source is also lying Michigan gop refuses to certify results because election fraud
 
They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Congress does have an obligation to find out exactly what happened therefore all results are void until the real outcome is found

No they don't. As elections are conducted by STATES.
So, you do believe in the right of the state to conduct its elections?...right?
Or is the answer no...because my great white hope got shown the door?
FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS do apply

Of course. But the feds don't interfere with the state right to hold an election.
So far, federal and individual state election officials have said there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Nothing to investigate. There is no "real" outcome.
The outcome is that Donald Trump lost. Because he was a terrible President.
End of story.
when fraud is in question I assure you they do have the authority to step in

No federal election official (involved in the actual election) has stated there is voter fraud or machine error involved here. And no, the Trump's appointed head of the FEC doesn't count.
fake news doesn't mean anything
and your source is also lying Michigan gop refuses to certify results because election fraud

Michigan will certify their results on Monday. Maybe you haven't been keeping up with current events. But a group of Michigan GOP lawmakers met with Trump officials today. Results contained in article.
 
They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Congress does have an obligation to find out exactly what happened therefore all results are void until the real outcome is found

No they don't. As elections are conducted by STATES.
So, you do believe in the right of the state to conduct its elections?...right?
Or is the answer no...because my great white hope got shown the door?
FEDERAL ELECTIONS LAWS do apply

Of course. But the feds don't interfere with the state right to hold an election.
So far, federal and individual state election officials have said there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Nothing to investigate. There is no "real" outcome.
The outcome is that Donald Trump lost. Because he was a terrible President.
End of story.
when fraud is in question I assure you they do have the authority to step in

No federal election official (involved in the actual election) has stated there is voter fraud or machine error involved here. And no, the Trump's appointed head of the FEC doesn't count.
fake news doesn't mean anything
and your source is also lying Michigan gop refuses to certify results because election fraud

Michigan will certify their results on Monday. Maybe you haven't been keeping up with current events. But a group of Michigan GOP lawmakers met with Trump officials today. Results contained in article.
again fake news
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
because a leftists judge rejects the case does that mean it didn't happen?
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
because a leftists judge rejects the case does that mean it didn't happen?
What evidence do you have that any of them are "leftist" or that their rulings were politically motivated ??
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
because a leftists judge rejects the case does that mean it didn't happen?

What leftist judge?
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.

Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.

Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?
The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.

You can shut up now.
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
because a leftists judge rejects the case does that mean it didn't happen?
What evidence do you have that any of them are "leftist" or that their rulings were politically motivated ??
because if it smells like a dead fish it's a dead fish and this election smells like the whole fish farm died.
 
Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
because a leftists judge rejects the case does that mean it didn't happen?

What leftist judge?
his leftist judge
Judge Matthew W. Brann

Federal judicial service
On May 17, 2012, President Obama nominated Brann to be a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, to the seat vacated by Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie, who was elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 2010. Brann was recommended by Republican Senator Pat Toomey as part of a paired nomination with a recommendation by Democratic Senator Bob Casey Jr.[6][7] The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on his nomination on June 27, 2012, and reported it to the floor on July 19, 2012.[4] The Senate confirmed his nomination by unanimous consent on December 21, 2012. He received his commission on December 27, 2012. Brann entered on duty as a United States District Judge on January 17, 2013. He sits at the United States Courthouse and Federal Building in Williamsport, Pennsylvania.[5]
 

Forum List

Back
Top