Dominion Execs Back Out Of Hearing In PA And Are Now In Hiding.....Some Offices Closed

[Claudette]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

 

[LoneLaugher]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?

 

[Claudette]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?

Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

If they want to clear the air they had the opportunity....they are guilty of something...their employees are wiping their social media that shows them to be workers or contractors for Dominion.....now we have moved even farther from being confident in this election....they should have showed up.....if they were totally innocent the would have.....

Why do you rape children??

Over and over again, we keep hearing about you raping children

Until you go to court and clear the air; we have no option other than to think you really rape children

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

If they want to clear the air they had the opportunity....they are guilty of something...their employees are wiping their social media that shows them to be workers or contractors for Dominion.....now we have moved even farther from being confident in this election....they should have showed up.....if they were totally innocent the would have.....

They have not been issued a subpoena to give a deposition. They have not been officially served to testify in front of any body. There is no summons issued for the court of public opinion. 80% of the country is confident in the election. Trump lost. You and the rest of Trump Nation don't like the fact your great white savior was shown the door so now, you're looking for any bullshit reason to cast doubt on the election...by largely trying to disenfranchise an entire race of voters..pretty much saying, "Your vote doesn't count".

 

[HaShev]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

Yeah, they are acting eerily similar to Enron Execs. I lived in Houston when that shit went down. I new 2 different guys who abruptly left the company with no explanation. This looks EXACTLY like that.

But, who knows. Maybe Dominion is not scurrying like cockroaches with the light coming on because of anything Trump's team found. Maybe they are also involved in a pension scandal like Enron.

In investigating Biden's Cancer charity scam I found out that Gregory Simon, the charity’s president lobbied for energy company Enron.
The Enron scandal was "an accounting scandal",
What I found in Biden's charity scam is the donated money that went to salaries instead of Cancer research or facilities, was portions going to his own campaign funds through MAX DONATIONS by the Charities staff. When the Charity was one of Obamas under another name, Gregory used to donate some of his salary to Obamas Campaign.
Making Gregory Simon the perfect president for a funneling scheme.

 

[LoneLaugher]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?

Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.

Hmmm. Does that apply when the person doing the refusing is Trump or a member of Trump’s administration?

 

[LeftofLeft]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?

Not necessarily. But it does raise doubt and concerns over Dominion’s ability to maintain credibility and integrity in an election. This is a market and voter trust issue. I’ve worked in IT product management for 25 years.

 

[colfax_m]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?

Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.

Does it?

Mueller confirms President Trump refused to be interviewed

Robert Mueller tells a Democratic congressman he spent a year trying to talk to Mr Trump in person.

www.bbc.com

 

[Claudette]

So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.

I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.

If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.

Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??

Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?

Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.

Hmmm. Does that apply when the person doing the refusing is Trump or a member of Trump’s administration?

Depends on what they are refusing to do.

 

[August West]

Even Chris Christie has seen enough of this national embarrassment.
Chris Christie calls the conduct of Trump’s legal team a ‘national embarrassment’ - The Washington Post

 

[Claudette]

Even Chris Christie has seen enough of this national embarrassment.
Chris Christie calls the conduct of Trump’s legal team a ‘national embarrassment’ - The Washington Post

I'll just stand over here and LMAO.

I seem to remember you lefty loons have very low regard for Christie.

Since when is it a national embarrassment to question a very questionable election? Loads of evidence says its questionable.

 

[Turtlesoup]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

Here's one for you..

Supreme court we have evidence of FRAUD using Dominion

SC...what says Dominion--

D-Team, that they plead the 5 th and now are on the run.

SC---will have no choice but to rule the election invalid

You know, that's not how it works, right?

You must work for Trump's clown show legal team.

That is how it works.

This is going to the SC... We all know this

Trump is going to claim corruption and fraud largely based on Dominion and failure of states to follow their own state laws which includes certifying election systems (dominion) and failing to do so knowing that dominion has a long history of failing certifications in other states and countries AND miscounting votes.


The question the supreme court will be forced to rule on is Dominion a safe reliable way to count votes-------which under theory would be based on witnesses including DOMINION who now in hiding and claiming the 5th in essence.

So Rudy and team-----will claim Dominion is unreliable based on their evidence and experts----while the dems will have no experts in the system as the system experts the company are in hiding.

The election will be ruled invalid due to not following state laws, not certifying the election system, the system having a variety of known issues, and likely even known voter fraud giving what we are hearing about flipping votes and Germany right now--------

Only variable is can the dems get to the 5 SC judges--------(not including sell out Roberts or the dems) and if Trump is going to give the orders that Dominion exes will be picked up by our military from whereever they are hiding in the world. It's not like the US really has anything to fear from Canada by sending the seals in to pick up dominion "experts" hiding.

Claim away. That alone won't make it in court. Rudy and the D-Team will have to walk into court and present their "evidence" to a judge who will then hear the evidence and rule on it. Depending on the ruling, it can then be appealed. Based on the result of that appeal(s), it may be taken to the Supreme Court and they decide to hear the case or not.

Do ANY of you Trump worshipers understand the basics of how a case gets in front of the highest court in the land? Hint..it doesn't happen because you wish it. Go back and look at the process for Bush v Gore if you need education.
So far, all lawsuits regarding fraud have been thrown out...so....nothing to take to the SC, let alone appeal.

I am sorry..........I'm not the one all giddy any time a dem partisan judge tries to stop Trump showing the fraud--we all know that cases can and will be appealed to the supreme court. we all know this is where this is going. I chose not to dabble with the lower courts because well their opinions don't really matter do they................the SC will be the final decision.

Don't know why you felt wasting everyone's time mentioning the lower courts except to try to blow smoke-------I think you failed in your endeavor.

Just educating you. You seem to be laboring under the delusion that this will go to the SC. Hint..courts don't decide elections. The people do. And they've spoken. No court in the world will invalidate this election. The only shot he has is to try and convince electors to vote for him. You can strike Michigan off that list.

Michigan lawmakers who met with Trump say they see nothing to change election outcome

Members of the Michigan state Legislature's Republican leadership who met with President Donald Trump at the White House Friday afternoon said they haven't seen any evidence that would change the fact that President-elect Joe Biden won their state.

www.cnn.com

Michigan? Did you just mention Michigan---hun Whitmer, the corrupt sec of state and others will be lucky if they don't have a rebellion come in and take them out of office and put them on trial for their crimes----Michigan is moving to rebel against their corrupt dems stealing elections and stealing their constitutional rights.

 

[daveman]

Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.

link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.

They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.

Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?

The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.

You can shut up now.

No. They didn’t. There was never a trial.

Rudy said that sworn affidavits ARE EVIDENCE. You seem to agree. Is that the case?

No, they are not evidence.

But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman.

Do you deny that?

Many democrats stated that, in there OPINION, the asshole was a creep and forced himself upon a female student when he was young. They based that on the sworn testimony of a woman.

He was never charged with a crime. He faced no legal action whatsoever.

"But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman."

Dude. I watched it. Stop trying to rewrite history.

 

[daveman]

Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.

link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.

They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.

Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?

The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.

You can shut up now.

No. They didn’t. There was never a trial.

Rudy said that sworn affidavits ARE EVIDENCE. You seem to agree. Is that the case?

No, they are not evidence.

But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman.

Do you deny that?

"we must believe the woman"

"unless she's Tara Reade accusing Joe Biden"

 

[daveman]

Like so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.

Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.

link to those accusation being proven false

Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.

They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.

Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?

The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.

You can shut up now.

No. They didn’t. There was never a trial.

Rudy said that sworn affidavits ARE EVIDENCE. You seem to agree. Is that the case?

No, they are not evidence.

But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman.

Do you deny that?

Many democrats stated that, in there OPINION, the asshole was a creep and forced himself upon a female student when he was young. They based that on the sworn testimony of a woman.

He was never charged with a crime. He faced no legal action whatsoever.

he was never charged because he was not guilty

Yeah? Does not being charged mean that one is not guilty? Or...only when you say so?

There were no credible accusations. You believed them simply because you hate the man.

 

[Oldestyle]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?

A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?

A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?

There is no evidence of voter fraud or machine fraud. The foaming at the mouth alt-right media took one user input error (not a machine error) of 6K votes in one county in Michigan and blew it up
to be this country wide conspiracy that moved millions of votes from Trump's column to Biden's. You right wingers are easy. You will believe anything those media whores at OAN and Newsmax will serve you.

 

[Oldestyle]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?

A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?

There is no evidence of voter fraud or machine fraud. The foaming at the mouth alt-right media took one user input error (not a machine error) of 6K votes in one county in Michigan and blew it up
to be this country wide conspiracy that moved millions of votes from Trump's column to Biden's. You right wingers are easy. You will believe anything those media whores at OAN and Newsmax will serve you.

Simple question then, Jack! Why isn't Dominion sending out it's people to show that's the case? Why would they go into hiding?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.

Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?

A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?

There is no evidence of voter fraud or machine fraud. The foaming at the mouth alt-right media took one user input error (not a machine error) of 6K votes in one county in Michigan and blew it up
to be this country wide conspiracy that moved millions of votes from Trump's column to Biden's. You right wingers are easy. You will believe anything those media whores at OAN and Newsmax will serve you.

Simple question then, Jack! Why isn't Dominion sending out it's people to show that's the case? Why would they go into hiding?

They have no obligation to. They haven't been subpoenaed by a judge or grand jury. Just a bunch of media mouths and a couple of PA legislators who've got no authority.
I'd tell em to go #sand too.
Biden won. Trump lost. Move on.