There are at least 4 agents here that refuse to use reason and won't recognize evidence reasonably.
What are the chances of that? I mean what kind of internet troll would sit on a thread week after week, with no evidence trying to assert a falacy only to becalled a treasonous infiltrator seeking to support secret methods of mass murder?
Really, who would do that? Anyone whacked enough to do that is going to go too far and get banned. The viewer is observing a psychological operation by professionals.
The internet enables this. DARPA, a divsion of the CIA developed the internet.
The internet started as the usenet which was a giant message board with softwaare hosted on university servers. Since university servers are public property, free speech controls them. After 9-11, truth seekers using free speech would have developed a version of what happened that was quite close after 2 years, EVEN with psyops agents trying to mislead them.
With .com, message boards ar private property where free speech can be banned. This is the reason I've been banned from perhaps 15 message boards. A reasonable person can easily see and admit that I'm not an offensive poster. I might use strong imagry to make my points or create motivatoln to examine them, but generally I only give out abuse that initially comes at me. Then when it returns to whoever started that level of exchange, it is basically relevant in more that one way and not crude.
I depend on Americans who understand the Constituton and due process and a modicum of common knowledge. If you are reading, and you happen to be able to understand most of what I post. Speak up!
I wish to thank usmessageboard.com for its fair and Constitutionally correct policies. So far, ............. in eight years, this is the best I've seen on .com.
All they did was allow me to use a logical definition of my oppositions obvious intention within this excahnge, which is to "keep the methods of mass murder on 9-11 secret."
great post Chris.

Yeah for a long time I thought Ditzcon was just a plain idiot in denial but the fact that he DEVOTES himself to coming here all the time when he doesnt believe in ANY government conspiracys is the sign of an agent.and candy corn is a well known agent everywhere.those for sure are two of the agents here.there is Gam as well.You can tell by the way they devote themselves to coming here and just sprout off all kinds of lies and b.s when evidence is presented to them.yeah there are some sites out there that dont want the truth to get out.I have some friends who have posted facts about 9/11 on threads and got banned just for that.at least they dont do that here.Yeah those sites that banned you are definetely run by psych op agents cause yeah,you only give out abuse when it comes to you first.
Excellent!
Oddly, it takes quite unsensational information such as a deception about a building design to make the agents obvious in their oppositional action.
For them, the perps,
The most important information to oppose is useful information, and such a statement or definition of their agenda is logical.
What gets really obvious is when one goes to topsecret.com or jackblood.com forum and common sense information with verified evidence is dissed as if one were suggesting that alien reptiles were shapeshifting their way into the whitehouse and NORAD on 9-11.
Image. The entire thrust of the last 30 years on TV, film, and music entertainment has been to make image more and more important so that citizens are more sensitive to social pressures. The idea is to preempt the functional group with one that is disfunctional. All of the non profit corporations are for that purpose.
Suck up as much energy, time and money as possible working on aspects that are not functional towards impeding the corporate goals.
Image is the reason most agents have a tricky avatar and username. The idea is to create an artifical society of elites that then dish out praise and scorn in the public arena to control the group, and the viewers perceptions of what is real and what is undesireable, ........falsely.