DOJ to Supreme Court: Killing Human Embryo in Womb is Not Abortion

[Asclepias]

a women with a sperm in her does NOT become someone elses property

Many women have had sperm in them, doesn't mean that a baby is formed!

I heard you exist on a diet of sperm so you seem to be speaking from experience.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I don't want to control anyone's life, I just have ethics enough to realize that a separate being, no matter what stage it is in, has a NATURAL right to live!

Pre viability it only has whatever rights the woman carrying it wishes to grant it.

And that's slavery! Want to also debate that point?

Sure, why not? Let's hear how you manage to define a pre viable pregnancy as "slavery"!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The idiot who wrote that article, and the OP pushing it are too stupid to understand in the rare, one in 100 million, if it happens, fertilized egg that may be prevented from implanting -- would be a zygote or blastocyst. Not an embryo.

Plan B isn't abortion, language abusing zealots.

Thanks for posting this FACT but don't expect it to change anyone's mind.

 

[Vigilante]

Well what the **** is it Holder? I know, just a bunch of cells...that becomes what each and everyone of us are, a human being! The cruelty and degradation of humanity is startling!

The U.S. Justice Department is telling the Supreme Court that killing a human embryo by preventing the embryo from implanting in his or her mother’s uterus is not an “abortion” and, thus, drugs that kill embryos this way are not “abortion-inducing” drugs. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby. The crux of the administration’s argument in this case is that when Christians form a corporation they give up the right to freely exercise their religion—n.b. live according to their Christian beliefs—in the way they run their business.....

DOJ to Supreme Court: Killing Human Embryo in Womb is Not Abortion | CNS News

DOJ is saying that when a corporation engages in the public market that public law supersedes religious beliefs of the owners.

This will be up to SCOTUS and 50% of the country will be unhappy with the ruling.

I don't know which amendment would supersede religious freedom when a corporation does it! Have a # of that one, so I can read about it?

 

[WillowTree]

its sceincey

you sure you want to know?

Give it up fool. You cannot even spell science!

 

[Vigilante]

nope.

a person is someone who has their own body and can use it to survive

Not according to this law...The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

It's such a shame all you pro death people weren't aborted. I'm agnostic, this has nothing to do with religion, but it does require one to have morals, ethics, and principles, which all of you seem to be missing from your genetic code!

You're such a moralist that YOU wish death on others.

How nice for you.

 

[Vigilante]

If you had to imprison someone to stay alive would that be legal?

I see NO woman behind bars, perhaps INCONVENIENCED, but what's that compared to a LIFE!

 

[Truthmatters]

telling a person they can not do something with their body is not right.


You want women put in prison for it

 

[Vigilante]

Remove the tissue and what happens to "it"?

If it's fertilized, it's murder!

the laws don't agree with you

Yes, it does...The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

 

[Vigilante]

so between the right of a would be person and a complete person you side for the tissue?

I side with LIFE, over INCONVENIENCE!

 

[Truthmatters]

The day you grow a womb inside you ,you may understandf

 

[Truthmatters]

You side with tissue over human beings.

You already wished I did not exsist along woith many other humans your talking to .
YOU are not moral

 

[WillowTree]

It is tissue inside a womans body until it can survive on its own.


that tissue his hers not yours

Then don't ask hobby lobby to pay for it. It's hers, let her pay for it. Hobby lobby didn't **** her!

 

[Asclepias]

If it's fertilized, it's murder!

the laws don't agree with you

Yes, it does...The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

You do realize that is if the embryo is harmed in the event of a crime right? Has nothing to do with your OP you dunce.

 

[Vigilante]

Youre too stupid to realize I didn't exist at that point so I will let it pass.

No, dimwit, that would be a Natural abortion, and until fertilization, you DON'T exist, one fertilized, you exist!

Nope!

All that "exists" it POTENTIAL human life. There are no guarantees during the next 9 months.

There are no guarantees in nature, but there is NO HOPE when man murders!

 

[Derideo_Te]

so between the right of a would be person and a complete person you side for the tissue?

I side with LIFE, over INCONVENIENCE!

Please provide credible evidence that 100% of all abortions are purely about "INCONVENIENCE".

 

[Vigilante]

Remove the tissue and what happens to "it"?

If it's fertilized, it's murder!

So God is now murdering the "unborn" according to Vigilante?

GOD? It's natures course!

 

[Truthmatters]

It is tissue inside a womans body until it can survive on its own.


that tissue his hers not yours

Then don't ask hobby lobby to pay for it. It's hers, let her pay for it. Hobby lobby didn't **** her!

but they do exist in a country that already decided this one.

they can leave

 

[Derideo_Te]

No, dimwit, that would be a Natural abortion, and until fertilization, you DON'T exist, one fertilized, you exist!

Nope!

All that "exists" it POTENTIAL human life. There are no guarantees during the next 9 months.

There are no guarantees in nature, but there is NO HOPE when man murders!

So mankind isn't a part of "nature" now?