DOJ Press Briefing In 10 Minutes (Matter Of Nat'l Security)

[okfine]

From what I'm reading on the interwebs...there is "supposed to be" a dept of justice press briefing at 11:00 ET (in 10 minutes)...on a matter of national security.

I have no idea what it might be about or if it's even going to happen...but I thought I would give a heads up.

Is Billy Barf gonna spew total BS as usual?

 

[Moonglow]

It's about muslim terrorist arrest...which is an interesting deflection from the FBI/CIA cover-up being exposed.

Yes interesting timing and probably designed to deflect from The Donald having all that stuff declassfied. I mean they could have announced these terrorists being arrested at ANY time, but they chose THIS time.

You have what is known as a one track mind, a one trick pony....Trump is yer world....

 

[MisterBeale]

Terrific!

Now all we have to do is free Assange and lock Hillary up, and this whole ISIS debacle will be behind us.

 

[Moonglow]

Terrific!

Now all we have to do is free Assange and lock Hillary up, and this whole ISIS debacle will be behind us.

Did they bury Gaddafi with a wooden stake in his ass?

 

[Moonglow]

When will they get to having Bush tried by the international court?

 

[aaronleland]

If you are curious, and Thunk is curious, does that make you two bi-curious?

I never said I was curious...but since you read that in where it doesn't exist...

It's cool. You and TemplarKormac can naked swordfight. Nobody's going to judge you for experimenting.

 

[whitehall]

The declassification of all documents pertaining to the attempted coup and Hillary's e-mail dump?

 

[MisterBeale]

Terrific!

Now all we have to do is free Assange and lock Hillary up, and this whole ISIS debacle will be behind us.

Did they bury Gaddafi with a wooden stake in his ass?

Can't say I agree with everything he wrote, but one thing I do know? There is no way in hell that Bush, Obama, Clinton or Trump could roll down WallStreet like this. . .



We have never had a leader so universally loved. . . maybe you should read up as to why, instead of just gobbling up propaganda? eh? What ever western press told you about him, was probably wrong.

File:Libya GDP per capita.png - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

http://www.911-truth.net/other-books/Muammar-Qaddafi-Green-Book-Eng.pdf

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Terrific!

Now all we have to do is free Assange and lock Hillary up, and this whole ISIS debacle will be behind us.

Did they bury Gaddafi with a wooden stake in his ass?

Can't say I agree with everything he wrote, but one thing I do know? There is no way in hell that Bush, Obama, Clinton or Trump could roll down WallStreet like this. . .



We have never had a leader so universally loved. . . maybe you should read up as to why, instead of just gobbling up propaganda? eh? What ever western press told you about him, was probably wrong.

File:Libya GDP per capita.png - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

http://www.911-truth.net/other-books/Muammar-Qaddafi-Green-Book-Eng.pdf

He told the IMF to GTFO, so they killed him for it.

Putin told the IMG to GTFO and, oh yeah, if you try to Qaddafi me, I'll fucking nuke you

 

[MisterBeale]

Terrific!

Now all we have to do is free Assange and lock Hillary up, and this whole ISIS debacle will be behind us.

Did they bury Gaddafi with a wooden stake in his ass?

Can't say I agree with everything he wrote, but one thing I do know? There is no way in hell that Bush, Obama, Clinton or Trump could roll down WallStreet like this. . .



We have never had a leader so universally loved. . . maybe you should read up as to why, instead of just gobbling up propaganda? eh? What ever western press told you about him, was probably wrong.

File:Libya GDP per capita.png - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

http://www.911-truth.net/other-books/Muammar-Qaddafi-Green-Book-Eng.pdf

He told the IMF to GTFO, so they killed him for it.

Putin told the IMG to GTFO and, oh yeah, if you try to Qaddafi me, I'll fucking nuke you

Personally? I believe Iran or Saudi Arabia was behind the Lockerbie airline bombing. I don't see that Libya's intel agencies had any political agenda or anything to gain by it.

Libyan intelligence officer convicted in Lockerbie bombing dies

Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, a Libyan intelligence officer who was the only person ever convicted in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing, died today nearly three years after he was released from a Scottish prison

www.nj.com

". . . Gadhafi handed over al-Megrahi and a second suspect to Scottish authorities after years of punishing U.N. sanctions. Four years later, in 2003, Gadhafi acknowledged responsibility — though not guilt — for the Lockerbie bombing and paid compensation of about $2.7 billion to the Lockerbie victims' families. He also pledged to dismantle all weapons of mass destruction and joined the U.S.-led war on terror.

The regime maintained it handed al-Megrahi over and paid compensation only to win the lifting of sanctions. The steps won Gadhafi quick rewards, with Western powers resuming diplomatic contacts and signing lucrative business deals.. . "



Why Did the U.S. and Its Allies Bomb Libya? Corruption Case Against Sarkozy Sheds New Light on Ousting of Gaddafi.

Why Did the U.S. and Its Allies Bomb Libya? Corruption Case Against Sarkozy Sheds New Light on Ousting of Gaddafi.

The former French president is accused of accepting campaign cash from the Libyan leader. The rush to bomb Gaddafi gets a necessary second look.

theintercept.com

" . . . Even Sarkozy’s successor, François Hollande, has implied that Gaddafi funded the Sarkozy campaign. In Hollande’s book, “A President Shouldn’t Say That,” while comparing himself to Sarkozy, Hollande wrote that “as President of the Republic, I was never held for questioning. I never spied on a judge, I never asked anything of a judge, I was never financed by Libya.”

Sarkozy’s corruption in Libya is not the first time a French president or top political figure has received illicit funds in exchange for political favors. Indeed, “Sarkozy’s corruption fits into a deeply ingrained, time-honored tradition in Paris,” said Jalel Harchaoui, Libya scholar at Paris 8 University. “In the 1970s, you had the scandal of Bokassa’s diamonds, which President [Valéry] Giscard accepted and took. You also have the “Karachi affair” involving kickbacks paid to senior French politicians via French weaponry sold to Pakistan in the 1990s. You also had Omar Bongo’s tremendous influence in Paris politics for years on end.”

<snip>

". . . By February 26, William Burns, under secretary for political affairs at the State Department, had spoken with Sarkozy’s top diplomatic adviser, Jean-David Levitte. Burns reported in an email to Clinton’s team that “on Libya, French strongly supportive of our measures,” but that there were “Fr concerns on NATO role,” likely meaning that France didn’t want a full-blown NATO intervention at that point.


French President Nicolas Sarkozy speaks with British Prime Minister David Cameron, right, and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, second left, on March 19, 2011, before a summit at the Élysée Palace in Paris on implementing a U.N. Security Council resolution for military action in Libya.
Photo: Lionel Bonaventure/AFP/Getty Images

"Two weeks later, Sarkozy made his first significant move to show that France, rather than being hesitant, had decided to take the lead in the fight against Gaddafi. On March 10, 2011, Sarkozy became the first head of state to recognize the National Transitional Council as Libya’s legitimate government. At the time, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said recognizing the NTC was “a crazy move by France.” Crazy or not, France was now in the lead in Europe. According to a British parliamentary inquiry into the intervention in 2016, “UK policy followed decisions taken in France.”

Sarkozy’s foreign minister at the time, Alain Juppé, then introduced United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, which called for a no-fly zone over Libya, ostensibly in order to protect an impending massacre of civilians in Benghazi by Gaddafi. Although American diplomats drafted the resolution, Juppé was the Western diplomat who argued most passionately for it, telling the Security Council that “we have very little time left — perhaps only a matter of hours” to prevent a massacre against civilians in Benghazi. The French emergence to the front line of the diplomatic push was an apparent reflection of Barack Obama’s doctrine of “leading from behind” and letting Europe occupy the limelight. Arab League support for the resolution helped create a broad coalition of powers, beyond just the West, and the Libyan deputy ambassador to the U.N.’s defection against Gaddafi helped push the resolution forward.. . . "

 

[Doc7505]

From what I'm reading on the interwebs...there is "supposed to be" a dept of justice press briefing at 11:00 ET (in 10 minutes)...on a matter of national security.

I have no idea what it might be about or if it's even going to happen...but I thought I would give a heads up.

There is also a Twitter rumour that FBI Director aka Shill Christopher Wray is going to resign today, read that as probably fired. For what a Twitter rumour is worth of course. Hold The Page....

~~~~~~
Please oh Please.....Trump should choose the next director for the FBI outside of the good Ole boy crowd of FBI officials. That should shake 'em up....

 

[Doc7505]

It might be about foreign influence on our voting system.
We know that the Chicoms and Putin are on the Antifocrat's side

~~~~~~
It's more like the false flag operation of Germany blaming Poland for invading Germany first in August 1939...

Gleiwitz incident - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org