DOJ goes full partisan.

[Kondor3]

What makes you say that?

Just like you (Republicans, collectively) did after 2020...

The Dems are showing early and convincing signs of getting their $hit back together again...

And, of course, the worst our 401(K)s "tank", the more likely that the 2026 mid-terms may shave-away your narrow margin...

Democrats in Congress have an abysmal 20% approval rating. The GOP in Congress has a 40% approval rating.

All true. At present the Dems don't know whether to $hit or wind their watches. But they're beginning to adapt.

WE are at risk? Where is your false confidence coming from?

There is no "confidence" at work here, merely an observation of trends and patterns related to the mid-terms, yes?

So why not "light a fire" and accelerate those investigations, indictments and trials before the POSSIBILITY of interference even comes up?

Do not make the same mistakes as the Democrats last term... you may not have as much time as you think... get crackin'.

 

[DonGlock26]

The Dems are showing early and convincing signs of getting their $hit back together again...

Bwahahahahahaha!!! Tell that to Chuckie Schumer.

 

[Marener]

Who knows where the records went, when the Biden Crime Family and the Obama undelings left the White House.
Hell, Biden had classified documents in his garage, if you remember.

And you think you can get a grand jury and a subpoena based on “who knows”?

 

[Kondor3]

Bwahahahahahaha!!! Tell that to Chuckie Schumer.

Ahhhh, yes, the inevitable "arrogance of incumbency"... it is the curse of Man that he learns nothing from the past.

 

[Meister]

Dunno man. Used to be that Americans looked down on heads of state calling people criminals just for being critical of them.

But here you are approving of it.

Well, when your ilk made up shit to try and keep him from running for president, he
probably has the right to call them criminals....because they were.

 

[Polishprince]

Why does the executive branch need a subpoena to obtain executive branch records?

Its not just the records, but the testimony under oath.

Particularly the testimony under oath of the scores of Biden collaborators who were given pardons and can no longer be subject to criminal charges and thus can't use the "5th" to escape ratting people out.

 

[Marener]

Well, when your ilk made up shit to try and keep him from running for president, he
probably has the right to call them criminals....because they were.

And what crime is that exactly?

Last I checked we still had free speech in this country.

 

[Marener]

Its not just the records, but the testimony under oath.

Particularly the testimony under oath of the scores of Biden collaborators who were given pardons and can no longer be subject to criminal charges and thus can't use the "5th" to escape ratting people out.

The government can’t force you to give testimony under oath without justification.

 

[Meister]

And what crime is that exactly?

Last I checked we still had free speech in this country.

Do your own research with what was done over the last 8 years.
It had nothing to do with free speech, despite what your masters tell you.

 

[Marener]

Do your own research with what was done over the last 8 years.
It had nothing to do with free speech, despite what your masters tell you.

Typical weasel answer for a low information hack.

Your masters don’t really tell you much. Certainly not enough to think for yourself.

What’s the crime?

 

[Polishprince]

The government can’t force you to give testimony under oath without justification.

The justification is that they are investigating the Biden Lawfare scandals and seeking to prevent this kind of thing from happening again.

And also, to find any unpardoned culprits who may still be at large.

 

[Marener]

The justification is that they are investigating the Biden Lawfare scandals and seeking to prevent this kind of thing from happening again.

And also, to find any unpardoned culprits who may still be at large.

The investigation needs justification. The DoJ isn’t allowed to use the authority and power of the court to go on witch hunts. You need evidence to support any subpoena.

What’s the justification?

 

[Rawley]

I'd have to see all White House records to answer that question. That's what grand jury investigations are for.

"We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by, if we, if he does run. I'm making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again."

 

[DonGlock26]

Senators Grassley and Johnson Provide Documents Outlining FBI Operation Arctic Frost, the 2022 Targeting of President Trump by the FBI - The Last Refuge

CTH has long documented the history of FBI as a political weapon for the interests of Washington DC. From a research perspective there is no longer any question about the intents and motives of the FBI as a fully weaponized agency, working against the interests of the American people. That...

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You are promising that the Democrat persecution of President Trump will immediately start up again in 2029.
I guess the Trump admin has no choice but to put his persecutors in prison.

What persecution? Being indicted and prosecuted for serious violations of the law? We will let the juries decide that, Don.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You are promising that the Democrat persecution of President Trump will immediately start up again in 2029.
I guess the Trump admin has no choice but to put his persecutors in prison.

That won't happen.

 

[DonGlock26]

That won't happen.

You can pray to Mao, I guess....

 

[DonGlock26]

What persecution? Being indicted and prosecuted for serious violations of the law? We will let the juries decide that, Don.

The Trump DOJ grand juries certainly will.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Trump DOJ grand juries certainly will.

Not worried at all about the outcomes.

 

[DonGlock26]

Not worried at all about the outcomes.

Me neither.