DOGE Goon Squad unmasked

[Delldude]

These kids are breaking the law every time they access federal records. trump may think he is above the law, but Musk and these kids are not.

Check this thread out:

What went down during Musk's Treasury hack.

 

[MarathonMike]

I have no doubt that Democrat bottom feeders are plotting the assassinations of these brave and brilliant young men. Democrats SUCK

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 1075443

Trump acts to remove Federal Election Commission chair – as it happened

This live coverage has ended, thanks for following along. You can find all of our US politics coverage here.

www.theguardian.com

The more you post the deeper you get into the mess that is being exposed. If you defend racists you are a racist. What I'm seeing from Trump, Musk and the spinless republicans is frankly sickening, truly terrifying.

You remain a delusional and ignorant twat.

There’s very little you won’t buy.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Answer me this, because THIS beats anything you could possibly attack the Democrats for.

One thing that is truly not understandable. This group of young people that are doing this at Musk's request, do not have any government positions. They have not received any security clearances and could actually be enemies to America. In addition, they are not even beholden to any guidelines that would be there if they were working for a company. These "kids" are freelance and can literally do what they want, and yet they have been given the ability to get all the information on 3.4 million Americans.

I truly cannot believe this happened.

First of all, we don't know if this is even a real story, given that the Daily Beast has very little reputation, and given the new fact that we now know that USAID funded thousands of journalists with no regard to the truth or falsity of their story.

Is this guy one of them?

Answer with evidence, please.

Second, even your Beast Story says nothing about them having access or accessing my or anyone else's social security numbers. Different people on the same system have different accesses. I use a system at my job, which has everyone's social security number who works in the district. Doesn't mean I can look up other employee's numbers, since District Payroll can. Why don't you know this? What kind of work do you do?

When you can show the story is real, that these young volunteers have access to the SSN's of people like me, I'll comment further on in. For now, I'll keep it simple:

Monica Lewinsky was not 26, but 20, when Bill Clinton decided that she was grown up enough to help him run the oval office. Like those men, she was a young volunteer with no official job at the white house. Yet, she was mature enough according to Bill to consent to his putting his penis in her mouth and a cigar in her lady girl bits.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

 

[JimH52]

Why aren't you taking to the streets with arms then?

MAGA does that. So I understand why are asking that question. You expect progressives to act like the animals on J6. That will not happen. We abide by the law. Obviously...you and the Felon in Chief do not. You expect others outside MAGA to do the same. You are just another MAGA cult member.

 

[Luckyone]

First of all, we don't know if this is even a real story, given that the Daily Beast has very little reputation, and given the new fact that we now know that USAID funded thousands of journalists with no regard to the truth or falsity of their story.

Is this guy one of them?

View attachment 1075493

Answer with evidence, please.

Second, even your Beast Story says nothing about them having access or accessing my or anyone else's social security numbers. Different people on the same system have different accesses. I use a system at my job, which has everyone's social security number who works in the district. Doesn't mean I can look up other employee's numbers, since District Payroll can. Why don't you know this? What kind of work do you do?

When you can show the story is real, that these young volunteers have access to the SSN's of people like me, I'll comment further on in. For now, I'll keep it simple:

Monica Lewinsky was not 26, but 20, when Bill Clinton decided that she was grown up enough to help him run the oval office. Like those men, she was a young volunteer with no official job at the white house. Yet, she was mature enough according to Bill to consent to his putting his penis in her mouth and a cigar in her lady girl bits.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

First of all, we don't know if this is even a real story, given that the Daily Beast has very little reputation, and given the new fact that we now know that USAID funded thousands of journalists with no regard to the truth or falsity of their story.

Is this guy one of them?

View attachment 1075493

Answer with evidence, please.

Second, even your Beast Story says nothing about them having access or accessing my or anyone else's social security numbers. Different people on the same system have different accesses. I use a system at my job, which has everyone's social security number who works in the district. Doesn't mean I can look up other employee's numbers, since District Payroll can. Why don't you know this? What kind of work do you do?

When you can show the story is real, that these young volunteers have access to the SSN's of people like me, I'll comment further on in. For now, I'll keep it simple:

Monica Lewinsky was not 26, but 20, when Bill Clinton decided that she was grown up enough to help him run the oval office. Like those men, she was a young volunteer with no official job at the white house. Yet, she was mature enough according to Bill to consent to his putting his penis in her mouth and a cigar in her lady girl bits.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

Is this evidence enough?

It has happened. There is no doubt about it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

View attachment 1075501

View attachment 1075502

Is this evidence enough?

It has happened. There is no doubt about it.

Of these 26 and under buddies of Musk getting access to Social Security numbers?

It is no evidence at all.

If you just mean that Elon Musk is working on government effeciency and you hate that, I already knew that.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Unmasked: Musk’s Secret DOGE Goon Squad—Who Are All Under 26 — The Daily Beast

The world’s richest man doesn’t want anyone knowing his right-hand people who are disrupting government.

apple.news

These kids are breaking the law every time they access federal records. trump may think he is above the law, but Musk and these kids are not.

What laws are they breaking? Be specific and show your work.

 

[Luckyone]

Of these 26 and under buddies of Musk getting access to Social Security numbers?

It is no evidence at all.

If you just mean that Elon Musk is working on government effeciency and you hate that, I already knew that.

What Trump has done is illegal.

He has given Musk access to sensitive information that Musk does not have a right to have. Musk has not been yet been given clearance to receive sensitive information, which is a necessity before he can do that. Musk was not elected or confirmed by Congress either. He is not holding a Cabinet position, meaning Congress does not have to approve him but then again, he is not allowed to get sensitive information without a security clearance. This is unconstitutional and an abuse of power.

Elon Musk does not have access to sensitive taxpayer info ...​

 

[Luckyone]

What laws are they breaking? Be specific and show your work.

Elon Musk does not have access to sensitive taxpayer info ...​

He was not elected and he was not investigated in order to get a security clearance. As such, neither him nor his crew has legal permission to have access to the sensitive information. Trump has done this illegally and against the Constitution

 

[ThisIsMe]

I must have really touched a nerve with this OP as the response to it has been overwhelming.

The question in the OP has been very simple and BASED on what Trump and Musk DID this week, which was give a group of young people the ability to see and have power over all Americans social security number. These young people hold no positions with the government, meaning that they have not even been given a security check. They could be anyone, even someone wishing to harm our country.

The question asked was a simple yes or no question, as to whether you thought that this was a correct thing to do.....................and WOW, the response what immediate and overwhelming and 100% tailored to demeaning the messenger, given that no one addressed the OP or answered the question. They simply attacked me for putting such an OP up.

It seems that I hit a nerve and the only nerve that I can see that applies is the one where Trump supporters do not want any negative truths/facts shown that make Trump and Musk ACTUALLY wrong and overstepping their powers. You know, like a dictator would.

Are you truly that scared? You are not sure that Trump can actually become a dictator and therefore work hard on those that are trying to make it known what he is doing?

I tell you, the response given is indicative of all of the above.

Uhh..you aren't the OP..unless you are saying JimH is your other account...

 

[Luckyone]

Uhh..you aren't the OP..unless you are saying JimH is your other account...

My OP was merged with this one. I put up my OP and within 5 minutes, I had 20 responses. It was then merged with this OP by an administrator

 

[Nobody911]

Not sure if the Supreme Court will consider those kids as experts. lol.

In the context of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, an expert witness is a qualified individual who can offer an opinion under oath during a trial or deposition to clarify complex concepts, present scientific evidence, evaluate data, and assist in understanding the implications of certain actions or events[1]. Their testimony helps jurors navigate intricate subjects and make well-informed decisions[1].

Here's a breakdown:

• Qualifications: An expert is qualified by their knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education[5]. They possess "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" that helps the jury understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue[1][3].
• Admissibility Standards: Expert testimony is subject to stringent admissibility standards. The trial judge determines the reliability and relevance of expert testimony[1].
• Daubert Standard: According to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, for expert testimony to be admissible, the court must determine that[1]:

* The expert's knowledge will assist the trier of fact[1].
* The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data[1].
* The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods[1].
* The expert has reliably applied these principles and methods to the case[1].

• Role: Expert witnesses serve as objective parties to a lawsuit, explaining complicated scientific issues without advocating for either side[3].
• Testimony: Experts present opinions and answer questions to establish their credibility, knowledge, methodology, and the basis for their conclusions[1]. Cross-examination allows for a critical evaluation of their testimony, challenging assumptions, methodologies, and potential biases[1].
• Impact: Expert testimony can significantly impact a lawsuit's outcome, especially in cases involving complex technical or scientific issues[1].

The Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. (1993) established the Daubert Standard, which federal courts use to determine the admissibility of expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702[1][2]. The Daubert ruling was influenced by Karl Popper's theory of falsification[5].

sources:
[1] expert testimony
[2] Guides and Resources: Expert Evidence: Home
[3] Expert witness - Wikipedia
[4] Expert Testimony: The Supreme Court's Rules
[5] A Brief History of the Expert Witness - PMC
[6] https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/13experts/T13.pdf
[7] https://legacy.pli.edu/product_files/Titles/4949/131989_sample01_20150331135910.pdf
[8] Federal Rules of Evidence and Experts: The Ultimate Guide

 

[justoffal]

Jim's check must be late

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Elon Musk does not have access to sensitive taxpayer info ...​

He was not elected and he was not investigated in order to get a security clearance. As such, neither him nor his crew has legal permission to have access to the sensitive information. Trump has done this illegally and against the Constitution

The president gave him permission. You wanted democracy. Here it is.

Do you really think the owner of SpaceX and his employees dont have security clearances? Think about that for a second.

 

[Seymour Flops]

What Trump has done is illegal.

He has given Musk access to sensitive information that Musk does not have a right to have. Musk has not been yet been given clearance to receive sensitive information, which is a necessity before he can do that. Musk was not elected or confirmed by Congress either. He is not holding a Cabinet position, meaning Congress does not have to approve him but then again, he is not allowed to get sensitive information without a security clearance. This is unconstitutional and an abuse of power.

Elon Musk does not have access to sensitive taxpayer info ...​

As we explained many, many times, who does and does not get sensitive information is entirely the purview of the president.

No matter how much the little junior Deep State minions hate it, no matter how many USAID bought out journalists rant against it, Donald Trump is president with all the powers and perogatives that other presidents have.

Elon Musk is a Special Government Employee, which is not a new thing that Trump invented.

Special Government Employees​

A "special Government employee" (or "SGE") is an officer or employee in the Executive Branch of the Federal Government who is appointed to perform important, but limited, services to the Government, with or without compensation, for a period not to exceed 130 days during any period of 365 consecutive days. This status is important because the ethics rules apply differently to individuals who qualify as SGEs versus other Federal employees and officials.

Show me anywhere that says that the president cannot provide sensitive information to an SGE. If you can't, stop making up rules, or blindly following liars.

 

[SweetSue92]

Why are you people so angry that they are uncovering waste and fraud in the government? If not for DOGE the American people would have no clue about USAID being a slush fund of corruption and abuse. I would think uncovering all of this is a good thing that everyone would agree on.

It's embarrassing. They're willingly making themselves into government serfs.

 

[hadit]

Wait until they publish the personal data of Azogthedefiler and other MAGA cult members.

And when they do, somebody goes to prison.

 

[GWV5903]

Unmasked: Musk’s Secret DOGE Goon Squad—Who Are All Under 26 — The Daily Beast

The world’s richest man doesn’t want anyone knowing his right-hand people who are disrupting government.

apple.news

These kids are breaking the law every time they access federal records. trump may think he is above the law, but Musk and these kids are not.

You’re the poster boy for Dumb and Dumber!!

 

[22lcidw]

MAGA does that. So I understand why are asking that question. You expect progressives to act like the animals on J6. That will not happen. We abide by the law. Obviously...you and the Felon in Chief do not. You expect others outside MAGA to do the same. You are just another MAGA cult member.

The more Progs talk like what you typed, the more resolve people will have against you. In the last year the tide has started to turn to common sense. Trim the extremism in your agendas. Most American have complained about corruption and political slants in government for a long time.