Avorysuds
Gold Member
RW does not welfare to go away or he would have no job.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for proving my point... They work just enough to keep them on welfare, it's the logical thing to do....
******* seriously, the democratic party is now the party of stupid.
Can you explain how your logic of "Welfare is a disincentive to work" translates to "Welfare recipients work."?
I did, but like I said the Democratic party is the party of stupid and you happen to be in that camp.
Again, people work just enough to remain on welfare... It makes them more money than working full time or it simply gets them enough to "get by" without working very much.
This is common sense, like... Your position is near that of denying evolution or gravity.
If the bills are paid. If a 'living' is provided. You suppose that food stamps and welfare checks amount to a substantial enough income to save for a house, make all the monthly bills, set a table with meals for everyone every day, pay medical expenses, buy clothing and provide all the comforts of home prior to the loss of the primary wage earner's job?What a dumbass question. Of course it does.
Why in hell would anyone want to go out and get a job when someone elses money is paying the bills??
Why in hell would someone actually want to work for a living when a living is being provided for them??
Why in hell would someone want to get off the gravy train when someone else is pulling it for em??
That's the misconception those who would argue from anecdote about those on public assistance. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. But convince those without basic human mercy.
If the bills are paid. If a 'living' is provided. You suppose that food stamps and welfare checks amount to a substantial enough income to save for a house, make all the monthly bills, set a table with meals for everyone every day, pay medical expenses, buy clothing and provide all the comforts of home prior to the loss of the primary wage earner's job?What a dumbass question. Of course it does.
Why in hell would anyone want to go out and get a job when someone elses money is paying the bills??
Why in hell would someone actually want to work for a living when a living is being provided for them??
Why in hell would someone want to get off the gravy train when someone else is pulling it for em??
That's the misconception those who would argue from anecdote about those on public assistance. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. But convince those without basic human mercy.
You are assuming that all people want the same standard of living you want. You also assume they make no income off the black market economy.
Does welfare make people lazy?
Some people are shut out of attaining the standard by forces largely beyond their control. A lack of jobs for instance. You are automatically ascribing sinister motives and alternatives to honest people trapped in a market that no longer provides a ladder from poverty into the middle class. In fact, that market no longer provides a ladder up through the middle class.If the bills are paid. If a 'living' is provided. You suppose that food stamps and welfare checks amount to a substantial enough income to save for a house, make all the monthly bills, set a table with meals for everyone every day, pay medical expenses, buy clothing and provide all the comforts of home prior to the loss of the primary wage earner's job?What a dumbass question. Of course it does.
Why in hell would anyone want to go out and get a job when someone elses money is paying the bills??
Why in hell would someone actually want to work for a living when a living is being provided for them??
Why in hell would someone want to get off the gravy train when someone else is pulling it for em??
That's the misconception those who would argue from anecdote about those on public assistance. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. But convince those without basic human mercy.
You are assuming that all people want the same standard of living you want. You also assume they make no income off the black market economy.
RW does not welfare to go away or he would have no job.
Can you explain how your logic of "Welfare is a disincentive to work" translates to "Welfare recipients work."?
I did, but like I said the Democratic party is the party of stupid and you happen to be in that camp.
Again, people work just enough to remain on welfare... It makes them more money than working full time or it simply gets them enough to "get by" without working very much.
This is common sense, like... Your position is near that of denying evolution or gravity.
No it doesn't. In order to stay on TANF you have to make pretty much nothing, and if you do earn money they pro rate it. How much do you think you would get if pro rate 357 bucks?
The problem is, morons like you know nothing about TANF, you don't even know enough to call it TANF. Or the fact unless you have medical reason you have to 40hrs of job search every day and turn in a log every day. In Washington State the first two weeks are spent going to modules learning skills to help you find a job, four times a week.
You claim quite a bit but you have nothing to back it up. Working 15hrs a week and only getting about 150 from TANF isn't making more if you worked full time.
So unless you want to post something that is based in reality, shut the **** up.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Can you explain how your logic of "Welfare is a disincentive to work" translates to "Welfare recipients work."?
I did, but like I said the Democratic party is the party of stupid and you happen to be in that camp.
Again, people work just enough to remain on welfare... It makes them more money than working full time or it simply gets them enough to "get by" without working very much.
This is common sense, like... Your position is near that of denying evolution or gravity.
No it doesn't. In order to stay on TANF you have to make pretty much nothing, and if you do earn money they pro rate it. How much do you think you would get if pro rate 357 bucks?
The problem is, morons like you know nothing about TANF, you don't even know enough to call it TANF. Or the fact unless you have medical reason you have to 40hrs of job search every day and turn in a log every day. In Washington State the first two weeks are spent going to modules learning skills to help you find a job, four times a week.
You claim quite a bit but you have nothing to back it up. Working 15hrs a week and only getting about 150 from TANF isn't making more if you worked full time.
So unless you want to post something that is based in reality, shut the **** up.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
I did, but like I said the Democratic party is the party of stupid and you happen to be in that camp.
Again, people work just enough to remain on welfare... It makes them more money than working full time or it simply gets them enough to "get by" without working very much.
This is common sense, like... Your position is near that of denying evolution or gravity.
No it doesn't. In order to stay on TANF you have to make pretty much nothing, and if you do earn money they pro rate it. How much do you think you would get if pro rate 357 bucks?
The problem is, morons like you know nothing about TANF, you don't even know enough to call it TANF. Or the fact unless you have medical reason you have to 40hrs of job search every day and turn in a log every day. In Washington State the first two weeks are spent going to modules learning skills to help you find a job, four times a week.
You claim quite a bit but you have nothing to back it up. Working 15hrs a week and only getting about 150 from TANF isn't making more if you worked full time.
So unless you want to post something that is based in reality, shut the **** up.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
I know people on welfare, I know they get food stamps, I know they get help with child care and living... And yet their spouse can make over 100k a year. You know nothing.

RW does not welfare to go away or he would have no job.
Huh?
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Thanks for proving my point... They work just enough to keep them on welfare, it's the logical thing to do....
******* seriously, the democratic party is now the party of stupid.
Can you explain how your logic of "Welfare is a disincentive to work" translates to "Welfare recipients work."?
I did, but like I said the Democratic party is the party of stupid and you happen to be in that camp.
Again, people work just enough to remain on welfare... It makes them more money than working full time or it simply gets them enough to "get by" without working very much.
This is common sense, like... Your position is near that of denying evolution or gravity.
How do you know? You dont know you just nkowSome people are shut out of attaining the standard by forces largely beyond their control. A lack of jobs for instance. You are automatically ascribing sinister motives and alternatives to honest people trapped in a market that no longer provides a ladder from poverty into the middle class. In fact, that market no longer provides a ladder up through the middle class.If the bills are paid. If a 'living' is provided. You suppose that food stamps and welfare checks amount to a substantial enough income to save for a house, make all the monthly bills, set a table with meals for everyone every day, pay medical expenses, buy clothing and provide all the comforts of home prior to the loss of the primary wage earner's job?
That's the misconception those who would argue from anecdote about those on public assistance. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. But convince those without basic human mercy.
You are assuming that all people want the same standard of living you want. You also assume they make no income off the black market economy.
No it doesn't. In order to stay on TANF you have to make pretty much nothing, and if you do earn money they pro rate it. How much do you think you would get if pro rate 357 bucks?
The problem is, morons like you know nothing about TANF, you don't even know enough to call it TANF. Or the fact unless you have medical reason you have to 40hrs of job search every day and turn in a log every day. In Washington State the first two weeks are spent going to modules learning skills to help you find a job, four times a week.
You claim quite a bit but you have nothing to back it up. Working 15hrs a week and only getting about 150 from TANF isn't making more if you worked full time.
So unless you want to post something that is based in reality, shut the **** up.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
I know people on welfare, I know they get food stamps, I know they get help with child care and living... And yet their spouse can make over 100k a year. You know nothing.
You are a liar. Good to know.
You can't back up your made up claims, so you lie. Stupid troll.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Does welfare make people lazy?
Here's the relevant question.....Would you rather pay $15k per year to keep a single mother and her two kids on welfare....or would you rather pay $120k per year to keep her and her kids in prison? Mom gets thrown off welfare, has to get a job(which don't even exist), that doesn't even pay the bills. So she deals drugs, gets thrown in prison. Kids don't have a mom, so they end up dealing drugs, or in an orphanage. Don't ya just love the con solutions?
No it doesn't. In order to stay on TANF you have to make pretty much nothing, and if you do earn money they pro rate it. How much do you think you would get if pro rate 357 bucks?
The problem is, morons like you know nothing about TANF, you don't even know enough to call it TANF. Or the fact unless you have medical reason you have to 40hrs of job search every day and turn in a log every day. In Washington State the first two weeks are spent going to modules learning skills to help you find a job, four times a week.
You claim quite a bit but you have nothing to back it up. Working 15hrs a week and only getting about 150 from TANF isn't making more if you worked full time.
So unless you want to post something that is based in reality, shut the **** up.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
I know people on welfare, I know they get food stamps, I know they get help with child care and living... And yet their spouse can make over 100k a year. You know nothing.
You are a liar. Good to know.
You can't back up your made up claims, so you lie. Stupid troll.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.