Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,211
- 16,848
- 2,250
Oh, unalienable rights can certainly be violated. But the concept of natural law is that they still exist even if violated. And exist autonomous of a government 'granting' such rights.George Takei would disagree with you.Because our rights are inalienable, they can be neither bestowed nor taken by any government, constitution, or man.
Although inalienable, our rights are not absolute – they’re subject to limits and restrictions by government consistent with Constitutional case law.
Laws and measures that limit or restrict a right consistent with the Constitution do not ‘take away’ one’s rights.
The obvious flaws in the 'natural rights' theory were demonstrated by the man who wrote of 'unalienable' rights in our own founding documents: Slave owners.
A mouse could starve on the difference between possessing an inalienable right that is being violated and not possessing the inalienable right to begin with.