Until such time as we see it, we are dealing with nothing but composition fallacies. None of these individuals you have pointed out represent the whole of the Democratic Party. And BTW, Democratic candidates have a long history of running against the Hyde Amendment.
Composition fallacies, eh?
As I said, Democrats are in fact moving, and even Biden dropped his support for the Hyde Amendment.
Yes, a composition fallacy. Biden does not represent the Democratic party in its whole.
The Hyde Amendment is not even a good example of a move to the left, as Democratic Party candidates have run against it going back years. Meaning that it is not even a shift to the left, but status quo. Clinton wanted to get rid of it. Al Gore famously changed his position on the Hyde Amendment and abortion in general.
You know, dummy, it's your reading comprehension disorder kicking you in the teeth again. I am talking about Democrats, Biden, for instance, or Inslee, or Warren. That's a far cry from alleging that the Democratic party is moving left - which would be the way in which you deliberately misread my text, and do it again even though I gave you a fair hint the first time you did it. Composition fallacies, my arse. Some Democrats are reversing themselves and come out in opposition to the Hyde Amendment. I've seen no one reversing him- or herself in the opposite direction. That is, Democrats moving to the left. Whether or not the Democratic party is moving to the left we will know once we see the party platform for the 2020 election. Which is the reason why, at this time, I am not talking about the party.
Now, you can lie again about what I am saying.