Does a criminal indictment of a former US President reek of a third world country?

[BluesLegend]

Does a criminal indictment of a former US President reek of a third world country?​

No that's Democrats you are smelling, they rarely bathe and stink to high heaven.

 

[BluesLegend]

Interfering in an election is the textbook definition of fascism.

What if you ignore the election altogether and a handful of elites picks the leader?

 

[whitehall]

"Show me the man and I will show you the crime"... Josef Biera, Stalin's chief of the secret police.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

They are socialist?

Yes, its not a secret...nor is the fact that you are not actually defending the interest of the countries as much as you are in perpetrating the myth that socialism isn't responsible for the economic drain of those states.

They are all part of the western democracies,

Which proves what? That they're social democracies in the west? what do you think social democrats really are?

of which there are about 50 or so, including the United States.

lets just stick to the ones you got caught with and not try to move this into an area where your original mistake can be enmeshed in semantics and distraction.

So, no, they are not.

They absolutely are undeniably socialist...in the west

That you make that claim destroys your credibility.

Pretty sure you realized that is what the claim did to your credibility.

 

[Rumpole]

Yes, its not a secret...nor is the fact that you are not actually defending the interest of the countries as much as you are in perpetrating the myth that socialism isn't responsible for the economic drain of those states.

Which proves what? That they're social democracies in the west? what do you think social democrats really are?

lets just stick to the ones you got caught with and not try to move this into an area where your original mistake can be enmeshed in semantics and distraction.

They absolutely are undeniably socialist...in the west

Pretty sure you realized that is what the claim did to your credibility.

This is the problem with debating the ignorant.

Your problem is obvious, but, of course, to everyone but you.

Now pester someone else.

 

[Plagerist]

Of course it does. It works in shitholes, so why not here.

The great issue of our time is nationalism versus globalism. The globalists hate Trump and will do ANYTHING to eliminate him.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

This is the problem with debating the ignorant.
Your problem is obvious, but, of course, to everyone but you.

Now you're pretending you provided some kind of debate?, you said "no" and then engaged in some ritual name calling which I guess passes for debate in white liberal circles.

Now pester someone else.

Don't worry rump, I haven't singled you out. there are plenty of white liberals getting what you got.

 

[Rumpole]

Now you're pretending you provided some kind of debate?, you said "no" and then engaged in some ritual name calling which I guess passes for debate in white liberal circles.

Don't worry rump, I haven't singled you out. there are plenty of white liberals getting what you got.

I'm sorry, since the days of the John Birchers, who are now morphed into the MAGA crowd, you morons have been calling dems that old extremely tired trope that we are 'commies' 'socialists' (as in the USSR kind ) for some 70 years now. Y'all just can't be taken seriously.
Now go pester someone else.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Oh I dunno..,

Is France a third world country?

France: In 2018, former French President Nicolas Sarkozy was indicted on charges of corruption and influence peddling. He is accused of accepting millions of euros in illegal campaign funding from the regime of late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Is Italy a third world country?

Italy: In 2011, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi was indicted on charges of paying an underage prostitute and abuse of power. He was ultimately acquitted of the charges, but he has faced several other legal challenges throughout his career.

Is Israel a third world country?

Israel: In 2019, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was indicted on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust. He is accused of accepting gifts from wealthy businessmen and offering political favors in exchange for positive news coverage.

Is Iceland a third world country?

Iceland: In 2016, Iceland's Prime Minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson resigned after the Panama Papers revealed that he and his wife had set up a company in an offshore tax haven. He was later indicted for tax evasion.

Is Spain a third world country?

Spain: In 2018, Spain's Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy was ousted in a no-confidence vote following a corruption scandal involving his Popular Party. Several members of his party were indicted on charges of embezzlement, fraud, and money laundering.

In other words, indicting a Prime Minister or President among the first world countries, AKA 'western developed nations',of which the US is a member, is NOT unusual.

You see, these countries believe in the concept that 'no one is above the law' and if we do not, then rule of law is dead, and if rule of law is dead, then we become a third world country. We only become a third world country when the rule of law fails, and the rule of men supplants it.

Do the crime, do the time. Goes for everyone, including the president.

I will accept the premise that if we are going to indict a President, it shouldn't be for a trivial misdemeanor. I want to see some felonies, the more the merrier, in the indictment, and NOT made up or trumped up charges, though I'm sure many on the right will characterize it that way.

What you who will make a political characterization do not realize is that no prosecutor, when it comes to the former President, is going to indict a US president without above and beyond compelling evidence. The bar shouldn't be any higher than any one else, but, prosecutors are human.

Prosecutors are human. Speaking of which, Imagine you are a prosecutor, state or federal, and you have facts which would conceivably allow you to indict the former President Of the United States, and not just any former president, a very rich former president whose base historically has threatened persons acting in ways not favorable to Trump.

You will be engaging in what is known as a 'maiden voyage prosecution', which is one that has never been done, i.e., the indictment of a former President.

And you know your case, though it might be good, almost always have a few slight defects. Few cases are slam dunk, even obvious ones. Those little defects in your presentation will be exploited, scrutinized, cross-examined, not to mention severely blown out of proportion by Trump in the public sphere, all without regard to costs of defense, all designed to mobilize his base against you. .

And you'd better not lose the case. The old proverb, 'if you shoot an arrow at the king, you'd better not miss' comes to mind. There can be no stakes higher for a prosecutor than to indict a President or a former President.

You will be thrown onto the world stage, you will be making history in the grandest of terms, and your every move, comment, anything and everything will be subject to world scrutiny, reporters will follow you everywhere, as Trump loving protesters will never cease harassing you, threatening your life and that of your loved ones, during the entire proceeding. Trump will make sly comments which will be tacit approval of such acts, such as 'bad things will happen if I am indicted' (while never condoning or being specific as to what those things are, in mob-esque fashion).

Trump warns of ‘problems’ like ‘we’ve never seen’ if he’s indicted. Well, he's been indicted, and we shall see.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/...like-weve-never-seen-if-hes-indicted-00056911

And Trump will be smearing you all day every day as long as you pursue the case against him, and it will not stop, the harassments by his base will be like a fire hose spraying poison into your house with indefatigable force.

And, if you lose the case, hell hath no fury like a Donald Trump on the vengeance path, all directed towards you with the full weight of his base and his wealth..

And there you sit many on the right, thinking this is just some petty bureaucrat who thinks it would be cool to indict the Us President, that he's some fuddy duddy who didn't give it a second thought, thought it would be cool to get 15 minutes of fame.

Nah, if you can grasp the circumstance facing Alan Bragg, Fani Willis, and Jack Smith/Merrick Garland, you'll understand that that view is cynical and simplistic.

In our case it sure does.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In our case it sure does.

Stupid and wrong.

Not putting him in prison for Jan 6 alone reeks of a stunted, developing country.

 

[22lcidw]

Stupid and wrong.

Not putting him in prison for Jan 6 alone reeks of a stunted, developing country.

Progs are of Castro, Stalin, Che, Mao material. So, it is who is in charge that condemns other men.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Stupid and wrong.

Not putting him in prison for Jan 6 alone reeks of a stunted, developing country.

For doing what, you communist?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Progs are of Castro, Stalin, Che, Mao material. So, it is who is in charge that condemns other men.

What is this useless word salad?

If you see every developed country as leftist, then you are the one with the idiotic standard.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For doing what, you communist?

Sorry, this thread is for peole who both can read and who have not been in a self induced coma/fever dream for 8 years.

Good luck

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Sorry, this thread is for peole who both can read and who have not been in a self induced coma/fever dream for 8 years.

Good luck

Ah, so you can't explain what Trump did. I already knew that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ah, so you can't explain what Trump did.

Haha, you guys will freely lie to yourselves just as easily as you lie to others.

Love it.

Keep flailing.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Haha, you guys will freely lie to yourselves just as easily as you lie to others.

Love it.

Keep flailing.

"love it" demonstrates your level of tard.

Go ahead tard, explain what Trump did on Jan. 6th, and why he should be in prison for it. This was your claim, somehow you can't defend it. How come?

JK, it was never your claim, you're no more than a recorder on playback.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"love it" demonstrates your level of tard.

Go ahead tard, explain what Trump did on Jan. 6th, and why he should be in prison for it. This was your claim, somehow you can't defend it. How come?

JK, it was never your claim, you're no more than a recorder on playback.

I don't feed the sealions, sorry.

I defer to the very public court filings and live video of that day.

Good luck. Maybe learning something instead of tugging on your micropeen will do you some good.

 

[WEATHER53]

Time has passed and the dog and pony show witch hunt has list almost all its steam
Kamala is the bright shiny object for the children right now

 

[IDIOCRACY]

I don't feed the sealions, sorry.

I defer to the very public court filings and live video of that day.

Good luck. Maybe learning something instead of tugging on your micropeen will do you some good.

Oh, I see. Then surely you can explain that in spite of said video and filings, Trump was never charged of anything, thus your rant was just a rant?

It didn't belong to you in the first place, that would require a brain. Your mom raised a tape recorder.