Dodgers Remove Gay 'Nun' Group From Pride Night

Um, what? I've seen male dogs hump other male dogs. Of course homosexuality exists in nature. What doesn't exist in nature is religion. Only human beings make up imaginary sky fairies.
You have seen male dogs enjoy anal sex, bullshit. A male dog actually managed to penetrate and know another dog, and that dog enjoyed it?

In your mind homosexuality is simply dry humping? And of course, that must apply to female dogs, you have seen them perform cunnilingus as a preference to mating with male dogs?

There is no argument for your kind of ignorance and such a very loose definition of homosexuality. Of course if we go with your definition, homosexuality is certainly an animal behavior which is an abnormality in human beings.
 
The problem with crazy people is that they tend to ramble.

except of course, your own bigotry, or maybe it is ignorance, that leads you to wrong conclusions

You assume and state I am angry, I am not.

You say that homosexuality does not effect my life, but is that true? My tax money now pays for transexual transitions. Certainly that is an effect. Also, I have had a loved one die of AIDS, your idea that homosexuality does not effect me is blatantly false.

Somehow, I doubt you are giving a penny for gender confirmation treatments... they aren't covered by Medicare or Medicaid.

AIDS has nothing to do with homosexuality, and if Reagan had treated it seriously, it wouldn't have been nearly as devastating as it was. (Kind of like with Trump and Covid.)

The wealthy takes more of what I make? The wealthy is the government, government taxes, rules, and regulation, as well as fees, takes more of money than anything else in my life. You are 0-2.

You are too stupid to realize that the wealthy are the ones taking things from you. Not sure I can educate you, but keep being angry at the gays while the rich screw you.

A lot of straight people do it? That makes it normal? It may make it prevalent, which is much different than normal.

No, it means exactly that... normal. People fine ways to gratify each other. You should try it some time.

and there is the fact that I never said people cant or should not be homosexuals,

You did not get anything right in your response to me.

Um,no, you just seem awfully obsessed about them.
 
You have seen male dogs enjoy anal sex, bullshit. A male dog actually managed to penetrate and know another dog, and that dog enjoyed it?

In your mind homosexuality is simply dry humping? And of course, that must apply to female dogs, you have seen them perform cunnilingus as a preference to mating with male dogs?

There is no argument for your kind of ignorance and such a very loose definition of homosexuality. Of course if we go with your definition, homosexuality is certainly an animal behavior which is an abnormality in human beings.

I wouldn't know if the male dogs enjoyed it or not. (I'm sure the one doing the humping did, not so sure about the one on the receiving end.)

Often, with dogs, such behavior is about dominance...

There's no loose definition of homosexuality. Homo (the same) Sexuality - having sex with the same sex you are. This isn't complicated at all.
And it's no weird, as opposed to belief in angry sky pixies that constantly needed to be appeased.
 
I wouldn't know if the male dogs enjoyed it or not. (I'm sure the one doing the humping did, not so sure about the one on the receiving end.)

Often, with dogs, such behavior is about dominance...

There's no loose definition of homosexuality. Homo (the same) Sexuality - having sex with the same sex you are. This isn't complicated at all.
And it's no weird, as opposed to belief in angry sky pixies that constantly needed to be appeased.
well said, explaining your ignorance, thank you
 
The problem with crazy people is that they tend to ramble.
Somehow, I doubt you are giving a penny for gender confirmation treatments... they aren't covered by Medicare or Medicaid.
Who pays for Medicare and Medicaid. JoeB131 is a nice example of somebody that is so ignorant they do not understand how the government pays for these programs through our taxes.

Joey131, there is not much more to say to you seeings how you have no understanding of anything, from dogs to taxes, least of all homosexuality.
 
The LA Dodgers, while being far out in the lunatic fringe (aka California), have shown at least some degree of mental stability by removing a total loon group called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence from their annual "Pride Night", after opposition from conservative Catholic groups.

This scenario is so filled with wokish lunacy, it's hard to know where to begin here. First one may wonder why the Dodgers would want to acknowledge anything that is LGBT, and call it "Pride". What is there to be proud of ? Being a sex pervert ? All the ridiculous "Pride"exhibitions are really nothing but attempts by the LGBTs to cover the shame they know is connected with their deranged lifestyles. For others in this lunatic fringe, they are so far gone in the head, that they actually consider themselves normal, and others resistant to them, to be hateful and bigoted.

In a letter to Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred, U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio said the sisters dress in “lewd imitation” of nuns.
“Do you believe that the Los Angeles Dodgers are being ‘inclusive and welcoming to everyone’ by giving an award to a group of gay and transgender drag performers that intentionally mocks and degrades Christians—and not only Christians, but nuns, who devote their lives to serving others?” the Florida Republican wrote.

On Thursday, the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence said the group wasn't anti-Catholic, and its members were offended and outraged by the Dodgers' decision.
“The Dodgers capitulated in response to hateful and misleading information from people outside their community,” the group said.

This is how removed from reality these nutjobs are.


It used to be a popular form of entertainment for white actors to wear dark makeup and impersonate exaggerated stereotypes of black people. “Blackface” is now regarded as offensive and racist, and is not well-tolerated among polite society.

But now, we have drag queens and “transgender women” doing the same thing with regard to actual women, and someone much of society fails to see that “womanface” is at least as offensive as “blackface”, or at least ought to be considered so.

And then there's this bunch, performing in “nunface”.
 
Sorry, Bud, as someone who grew up Catholic and had to put up with these psychos for 12 years, I can tell you straight up, these women were all frustrated lesbians.
They were "married to Jesus", but they were bumping the clams.
That is just your ignorant opinion.

You seem to have misspelled “twisted sexual fantasies”.
 
Perverts assume most people are just like them so they denigrate and demean people. Certainly we can see how ignorance goes hand in hand when people do not learn the skills to be in natural relationships

It's known as “psychological projection”. JoeB131 is probably one of the most perfect model examples of it; constantly attributing to others, degenerate traits that are very obviously his own.
 
FxF4tu0aAAAkTok
 
But they weren't fifty years ago... They were actually AGAINST THE LAW until 1967.






Okay, let's look at that.

nearly half of straight men engage in anal sex with their female partners.


Here's what they found: The National Survey of Family Growth, conducted between 2006 and 2008 with people between the ages of 15 and 44, concluded that 44 percent of straight men and 36 percent of straight women have had anal sex at least once in their lives. Even factoring in the ubiquity and ease of access to hard-core porn, those numbers still seem a little startling. And the surprises don't stop there.

Conversely, we can argue that it wasn't supposed to go in the mouth, either, but 85% of men have had oral sex at some point in their lives.


This statistic shows the share of American men who have received oral sex in the past month, the past year, or in their lifetime. The findings were acquired in early 2015 and published in 2017. During the survey, 85 percent of male respondents stated they have received oral sex at some time during their life.
Men engaging in oral or anal with a woman is one of several ways they can enjoy themselves, but the PRIMARY way is vaginal.

Gays have no such option making homosexuality inferior. No need for the relationships to be considered equal.
 
The problem is that even in a heterosexual relationship, you need to mix it up sometimes. Otherwise it gets boring.
I never get bored with sex. Maybe you have low testosterone levels.

It comes from seeing women as nothing better than whores, to be used for one's own sexual pleasure. As one who has been married for over twenty-eight years, now, I can certainly say, with a very high degree of confidence, that my marriage would have failed a very long time ago, if that was how I saw my wife, if that was how I treated her.

JoeB131 having very solidly demonstrated that exact attitude toward women, now, at the age of sixty, finally talking about getting married; either he is going to very rapidly learn some things about women, that are wildly different than what he has assumed all his life, that most men know by the time they are a third of his age; or else his marriage is going to be a very rapid and spectacular failure, leaving him even more bitter and hateful about the entire concept of marriage than he was before he met the lady that has apparently convinced him to reconsider his previous attitude about marriage.
 
It used to be a popular form of entertainment for white actors to wear dark makeup and impersonate exaggerated stereotypes of black people. “Blackface” is now regarded as offensive and racist, and is not well-tolerated among polite society.

But now, we have drag queens and “transgender women” doing the same thing with regard to actual women, and someone much of society fails to see that “womanface” is at least as offensive as “blackface”, or at least ought to be considered so.

And then there's this bunch, performing in “nunface”.



It comes from seeing women as nothing better than whores, to be used for one's own sexual pleasure. As one who has been married for over twenty-eight years, now, I can certainly say, with a very high degree of confidence, that my marriage would have failed a very long time ago, if that was how I saw my wife, if that was how I treated her.

Wow, Mormon Bob, still obsessing about my sex life, which is weird.... kind of like stalking people on LinkedIn... Weird.



@JoeB131 having very solidly demonstrated that exact attitude toward women, now, at the age of sixty, finally talking about getting married; either he is going to very rapidly learn some things about women, that are wildly different than what he has assumed all his life, that most men know by the time they are a third of his age; or else his marriage is going to be a very rapid and spectacular failure, leaving him even more bitter and hateful about the entire concept of marriage than he was before he met the lady that has apparently convinced him to reconsider his previous attitude about marriage.

Meh, actually, the biggest challenge I have right now is getting her to show more agency. She comes from a culture where the women just do what the men tell them to do.

Which I am sure is considered the Norm in your cult, but isn't really something I'm into.
 
how about writing a sentence that one can read and understand what you are trying to say,
Sure. Let me dumb it down for you. Humans have all sorts of natural relationships that don't have anything to do with continuing the cycles of life. We have relationships with people we work with. Relationships with friends and neighbors. We're a social species so diverse relationships are perfectly natural to us. On top of that even some heterosexual relationships are incapable of continuing the cycle of life due to infertility. If you want to understand whether or not something is natural simply ask yourself if nature allows it. If nature allows it then it is natural. Nature allows for homosexuality, infertility and platonic relationships and therefore they are natural.
 
Sure. Let me dumb it down for you. Humans have all sorts of natural relationships that don't have anything to do with continuing the cycles of life. We have relationships with people we work with. Relationships with friends and neighbors. We're a social species so diverse relationships are perfectly natural to us. On top of that even some heterosexual relationships are incapable of continuing the cycle of life due to infertility. If you want to understand whether or not something is natural simply ask yourself if nature allows it. If nature allows it then it is natural. Nature allows for homosexuality, infertility and platonic relationships and therefore they are natural.
Yes, a natural relationship is a relationship that continues the cycle of life, without such you would not exist to ramble and sputter like an ignorant fool
 
Yes, a natural relationship is a relationship that continues the cycle of life, without such you would not exist to ramble and sputter like an ignorant fool
Simply saying yes isn't a refutation of anything else I said you dumb Bingo. If nature allows for homosexuality, which it does, then it's natural.
 

Forum List

Back
Top