jknowgood
Diamond Member
Nope ivermectin works and Fauci and all the other leaders that banned it. Should be tried for murdering thousands.It’s a frivolous lawsuit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope ivermectin works and Fauci and all the other leaders that banned it. Should be tried for murdering thousands.It’s a frivolous lawsuit.
Science says otherwise.Nope ivermectin works and Fauci and all the other leaders that banned it. Should be tried for murdering thousands.
I know that ivermectin was approved for human consumption for treatment in other areas. So taking one for animals is not a good idea however if a doctor told me o use it for another purpose, then after a series of questions a person should be able to use it if they choose.People Hospitalized After Taking Animal Drug Ivermectin for …
Ivermectin will land you in the hospital - Search![]()
WebMD - Better information. Better health.
The leading source for trustworthy and timely health and medical news and information. Providing credible health information, supportive community, and educational services by blending award-winning expertise in content, community services, expert commentary, and medical review.www.webmd.com
The "snake oil" you refer to has been proven safe and effective over DECADES of use. Non-thinking minions like you aided the smear campaign that contributed to countless UNNECESSARY DEATHS all in the name of Big Pharma profit.One can always count on the usual suspects for the usual butt hurt delusions as they advocate for quacks' licence to sell snake oil.
The FDA warns against this and says large doses can be dangerous. This double-blind study began in June 2021 and enrolled more than 1,500 participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms across the United States. They took 400 mcg/kg per day of ivermectin or a placebo for three days. Over eight months, there was no difference in symptom ...
Lol, the party that thinks a guy can be a girl is saying something about science. I rest my case.Science says otherwise.
Another mindless minion chirping the mantra: We must believe the SCIENCE!!! How about the SCIENCE that proved over decades of use that Ivermectin and HCQ are safe and effective? Where was the SCIENCE that proved these experimental vaccines that reprogram your cells sprout spike proteins are safe and effective? Oh there wasn't any, you just participated in the largest vaccine test study in world history. Hope it works out for you.Science says otherwise.
This is a bunch of gibberish.Another mindless minion chirping the mantra: We must believe the SCIENCE!!! How about the SCIENCE that proved over decades of use that Ivermectin and HCQ are safe and effective? Where was the SCIENCE that proved these experimental vaccines that reprogram your cells sprout spike proteins are safe and effective? Oh there wasn't any, you just participated in the largest vaccine test study in world history. Hope it works out for you.
Other studies say it does help.The controlled blind trial showed no benefit to COVID sufferers from ingesting Ivermectin. I understand deplorables don't get science. No worries, they wouldn't be deplorable if they did.
The "snake oil" you refer to has been proven safe and effective over DECADES of use. Non-thinking minions like you aided the smear campaign that contributed to countless UNNECESSARY DEATHS all in the name of Big Pharma profit.
There are even more important matters within the so-called pandemic to consider, specifically how extensively damaged the immune systems are of the poor fools who submitted to the jabs, because people in the know, true medical experts, not Fauci and Bill Gates, believe many of you are now a ticking time bomb,
![]()
Tucker Carlson: Biden's COVID-19 positive test steps on vaccine message
"Tucker Carlson Tonight" host voices his concerns over the vaccine mandates following Biden testing positive for COVID, despite being vaccinated and boosted.www.foxnews.com
A study of observational studies, not a controlled blind trial.Other studies say it does help.
Seven studies showed a lower mortality rate in the ivermectin group than in the control group, six studies found that the ivermectin group had a significantly fewer length of hospitalization than the control group, and eight studies showed better negative RT-PCR responses in the IVM group than in the control group.![]()
Is Ivermectin Effective in Treating COVID-19? - PubMed
Coronavirus disease 2019 was first discovered in December 2019 and subsequently became a global pandemic with serious political, economic, and social implications worldwide. We urgently need to find drugs that can be effective against COVID-19. Among the many observational studies, ivermectin...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
You mean the way Trump pretended it wasn't happening so it wouldn't impact his re-election? Hard to disagree.The government doesn't care about you, just their power. How they handled the pandemic proved it.
I believe the people whose rules are shown to have worked, not deplorable mouthpieces who politicised an epidemic to enable re-election.Apparently cnm would rather believe the same people that now have recanted their own draconian Covid rules.
Considering that trusting the LOTUS when he said COVID would disappear was so much more productive.Can you imagine these people trusting someone like Fauci.
Shut up bigots it been deboonked..it's for horses!...it's extremely dangerous! Follow the science stupid!More chickens coming home to roost.
The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling — commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use.
The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling — commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use....
....
In their complaint, they site an FDA publication, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” and tweets from the FDA — including one implying that ivermectin is intended only for animals — among examples of the FDA discouraging the use of ivermectin.
Their rules caused more pain than Covid.I believe the people whose rules are shown to have worked, not deplorable mouthpieces who politicised an epidemic to enable re-election.
View attachment 686451
The ones whose rules were shown to have worked when they were properly designed and implemented?Their rules caused more pain than Covid.