Well there you go Big Guy. My statement Bush Lied looks like an idiot spewing out a rhetorical political nervous tick if you dont see the context I was responding to.
In the future, try to see what people are refering to huh? A little common courtesy is all Im asking
How old are you? That's right school is out for the summer.
DUDE! Look over your life and the links, here. Ask yourself, ARE YOU A TROLL? Do you live under a bridge, etc., etc.:
How to tell if youÂ’re a troll
Maybe you are a stalking, wobbling, lurching oxymoron, such as a living-dead, brain-eating, crazy m-f'n, redstate-retard, of a ZOMBIE:
What is apparent is bigretardedqueenofcalinkey, The ****, pussyshithead, Queer Fartbag, Unconsciouscornhole, and most of the day-crew at this thread pushed the page total WAY UP, without doping out the upcoming play, very well.
As I write this, the House Investigative Committee is about to vote, tomorrow, June 28, 2012, on whether Atty.Gen.Eric Holder is in contempt of Congress, for withholding documents, related to Operation Fast and Furious, which was like the Bush Administration's Project Gunrunner and Operation Wide Receiver.
Relative to Operation F&F, marked guns were used as sting-bait, to lure Mexican drug cartel-connected criminals, to involve themselves, whereupon the evidence was to be used, to convict persons, arrested.
But something went wrong. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed, in 2010, and guns connected to Op.F&F were found, nearby. Eric Holder has withheld documents, requested by the House committee, after providing some of the documents, requested by the committee and Chairman Darrell Issa, R-CA.
The vote happens tomorrow. As the following articles describe, the USDOJ would be the enforcing body, IF the committee issues a contempt citation, but Atty.Gen.Holder heads the USDOJ.
Furthermore, the ATF claims related investigations are ongoing, so what will the Republicans do, in court, if they have the nerve, to take Holder and the USDOJ and the ATF, to court?
Will the House committee get their documents, or will Holder and the USDOJ and the ATF keep everything? Comment-e-vouz, otay?
Holder faces House contempt vote on gun probe | Reuters
The Republican-led House is scheduled to vote on Thursday on whether to charge the nation's top law enforcement officer with contempt of Congress related to his withholding of documents in the "Fast and Furious" gun-running sting operation on the U.S.-Mexico border.
The operation was run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which is part of the Justice Department that Holder heads.
Speaking at a Reuters Washington Summit, Pelosi called the move against Holder "one of the most irresponsible" acts she has witnessed in the Congress, but said some Democrats are feeling pressure to vote with Republicans.
The National Rifle Association, which wields influence in both parties in Washington, has put members on notice that the contempt vote is considered a "gun issue" with repercussions for anyone voting no.
The Democratic leader said she tells members that if the Republicans "are acting politically, you may have to react politically."
Pelosi accused Republicans of trying to "tie up" Holder to keep him from looking into voter suppression activities around the country. "They want the attorney general to be tied up," she said. "They don't want him to combat voter fraud. This is such a canard."
Fast and Furious, devised by law enforcement officials in Arizona, which borders Mexico, was aimed at tracing the illegal flow of guns from the United States over the border where they were suspected of falling into the hands of violent drug cartels.
The operation went awry when agents lost track of many of the guns and at least one was found at the murder site of a U.S. Border Patrol agent. The Justice Department initially maintained that there was no operation in 2009 and 2010 to let guns "walk" over the border - a claim the agency later withdrew.
House Republicans say they are trying to determine whether high-ranking administration officials knew the true nature of Fast and Furious but withheld it from congressional investigators.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is seeking documents which Holder declined to provide after months of negotiations with top Republican leaders who control the House, saying he had already turned over thousands of pages relating to the operation, code named "Fast and Furious."
-----------------------
The truth about the Fast and Furious scandal - Fortune Features
The ATF's accusers seem untroubled by evidence that the policy they have pilloried didn't actually exist. "It gets back to something basic for me," says Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). "Terry was murdered, and guns from this operation were found at his murder site." A spokesman for Issa denies that politics has played a role in the congressman's actions and says "multiple individuals across the Justice Department's component agencies share responsibility for the failure that occurred in Operation Fast and Furious." Issa's spokesman asserts that even if ATF agents followed prosecutors' directives, "the practice is nonetheless gun walking." Attorneys for Dodson declined to comment on the record.
For its part, the ATF would not answer specific questions, citing ongoing investigations. But a spokesperson for the agency provided a written statement noting that the "ATF did not exercise proper oversight, planning or judgment in executing this case. We at ATF have accepted responsibility and have taken appropriate and decisive action to insure that these errors in oversight and judgment never occur again." The statement asserted that the "ATF has clarified its firearms transfer policy to focus on interdiction or early intervention to prevent the criminal acquisition, trafficking and misuse of firearms," and it cited changes in coordination and oversight at the ATF.
Irony abounds when it comes to the Fast and Furious scandal. But the ultimate irony is this: Republicans who support the National Rifle Association and its attempts to weaken gun laws are lambasting ATF agents for not seizing enough weapons—ones that, in this case, prosecutors deemed to be legal.
----------------------------
Rep. Issa Letter to Obama Re: Executive Privilege
----------------------------
How will this play out? Will Issa have to eat poo, on toast? Will he affect the election? I don't think he can have Holder or Obama, and I don't think he can have the election, and I didn't show up to the party with CRS, like Romney dodging Bullygate, but folks have their opinions. Let's see if this case stays alive, through November.
But tomorrow, team Issa tries to beat the odds, with a vote, on an unenforcible charge.
DUDE! Look over your life and the links, here. Ask yourself, ARE YOU A TROLL? Do you live under a bridge, etc., etc.:
How to tell if youÂ’re a troll
Maybe you are a stalking, wobbling, lurching oxymoron, such as a living-dead, brain-eating, crazy m-f'n, redstate-retard, of a ZOMBIE:
What is apparent is bigretardedqueenofcalinkey, The ****, pussyshithead, Queer Fartbag, Unconsciouscornhole, and most of the day-crew at this thread pushed the page total WAY UP, without doping out the upcoming play, very well.
As I write this, the House Investigative Committee is about to vote, tomorrow, June 28, 2012, on whether Atty.Gen.Eric Holder is in contempt of Congress, for withholding documents, related to Operation Fast and Furious, which was like the Bush Administration's Project Gunrunner and Operation Wide Receiver.
Relative to Operation F&F, marked guns were used as sting-bait, to lure Mexican drug cartel-connected criminals, to involve themselves, whereupon the evidence was to be used, to convict persons, arrested.
But something went wrong. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed, in 2010, and guns connected to Op.F&F were found, nearby. Eric Holder has withheld documents, requested by the House committee, after providing some of the documents, requested by the committee and Chairman Darrell Issa, R-CA.
The vote happens tomorrow. As the following articles describe, the USDOJ would be the enforcing body, IF the committee issues a contempt citation, but Atty.Gen.Holder heads the USDOJ.
Furthermore, the ATF claims related investigations are ongoing, so what will the Republicans do, in court, if they have the nerve, to take Holder and the USDOJ and the ATF, to court?
Will the House committee get their documents, or will Holder and the USDOJ and the ATF keep everything? Comment-e-vouz, otay?
Holder faces House contempt vote on gun probe | Reuters
The Republican-led House is scheduled to vote on Thursday on whether to charge the nation's top law enforcement officer with contempt of Congress related to his withholding of documents in the "Fast and Furious" gun-running sting operation on the U.S.-Mexico border.
The operation was run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which is part of the Justice Department that Holder heads.
Speaking at a Reuters Washington Summit, Pelosi called the move against Holder "one of the most irresponsible" acts she has witnessed in the Congress, but said some Democrats are feeling pressure to vote with Republicans.
The National Rifle Association, which wields influence in both parties in Washington, has put members on notice that the contempt vote is considered a "gun issue" with repercussions for anyone voting no.
The Democratic leader said she tells members that if the Republicans "are acting politically, you may have to react politically."
Pelosi accused Republicans of trying to "tie up" Holder to keep him from looking into voter suppression activities around the country. "They want the attorney general to be tied up," she said. "They don't want him to combat voter fraud. This is such a canard."
Fast and Furious, devised by law enforcement officials in Arizona, which borders Mexico, was aimed at tracing the illegal flow of guns from the United States over the border where they were suspected of falling into the hands of violent drug cartels.
The operation went awry when agents lost track of many of the guns and at least one was found at the murder site of a U.S. Border Patrol agent. The Justice Department initially maintained that there was no operation in 2009 and 2010 to let guns "walk" over the border - a claim the agency later withdrew.
House Republicans say they are trying to determine whether high-ranking administration officials knew the true nature of Fast and Furious but withheld it from congressional investigators.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is seeking documents which Holder declined to provide after months of negotiations with top Republican leaders who control the House, saying he had already turned over thousands of pages relating to the operation, code named "Fast and Furious."
-----------------------
The truth about the Fast and Furious scandal - Fortune Features
The ATF's accusers seem untroubled by evidence that the policy they have pilloried didn't actually exist. "It gets back to something basic for me," says Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). "Terry was murdered, and guns from this operation were found at his murder site." A spokesman for Issa denies that politics has played a role in the congressman's actions and says "multiple individuals across the Justice Department's component agencies share responsibility for the failure that occurred in Operation Fast and Furious." Issa's spokesman asserts that even if ATF agents followed prosecutors' directives, "the practice is nonetheless gun walking." Attorneys for Dodson declined to comment on the record.
For its part, the ATF would not answer specific questions, citing ongoing investigations. But a spokesperson for the agency provided a written statement noting that the "ATF did not exercise proper oversight, planning or judgment in executing this case. We at ATF have accepted responsibility and have taken appropriate and decisive action to insure that these errors in oversight and judgment never occur again." The statement asserted that the "ATF has clarified its firearms transfer policy to focus on interdiction or early intervention to prevent the criminal acquisition, trafficking and misuse of firearms," and it cited changes in coordination and oversight at the ATF.
Irony abounds when it comes to the Fast and Furious scandal. But the ultimate irony is this: Republicans who support the National Rifle Association and its attempts to weaken gun laws are lambasting ATF agents for not seizing enough weapons—ones that, in this case, prosecutors deemed to be legal.
----------------------------
Rep. Issa Letter to Obama Re: Executive Privilege
----------------------------
How will this play out? Will Issa have to eat poo, on toast? Will he affect the election? I don't think he can have Holder or Obama, and I don't think he can have the election, and I didn't show up to the party with CRS, like Romney dodging Bullygate, but folks have their opinions. Let's see if this case stays alive, through November.
But tomorrow, team Issa tries to beat the odds, with a vote, on an unenforcible charge.
Gotta love the Left.
Bush gets Approval from Congress for Iraq and he needs to be Impeached.
Obama tells Congress and the SCOTUS to go **** themselves and they defend Obama.
Bush lied to Congress.
Gotta love the Left.
Bush gets Approval from Congress for Iraq and he needs to be Impeached.
Obama tells Congress and the SCOTUS to go **** themselves and they defend Obama.
Bush lied to Congress.
When?
It only reads titles, apparently, not content.
OMG what a bot, Lakhota is a complete tool. Whatelse can you say?
Can you specifically point me to exactly where in The Hill article that Napolitano admits to knowing about Fast & Furious in 2009?
