Do you think Biden will start World War Three?

[easyt65]

Putin will. Joe's just one of the doofuses pressuring him to do so.

 

[mak2]

If anyone started WW III it was Putin.

 

[ElmerMudd]

What would happen if Putin decided to us tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine? Would Nato and the US respond in kind? Putin has been moving nuclear capable bombers to airfields in range of Ukraine. While this is being written off by US media and Washington as just scare tactics, how much faith should the American people have in the competence of the Biden Administration not to start World War Three? Once the first nuclear ordinance is deployed in Ukraine it will be like a match touched to a fuse. If Putin decides the fate of Ukraine with nuclear bombers the US will face a standoff that could spell the end of the civilized world.


EXPLAINER: How real are Putin's nuclear threats in Ukraine?

Putin raised the threat, but what are Russia's nuclear capabilities?

President Vladimir Putin says he will defend Russia's territory with every means at his disposal, and it's put the threat of nuclear war back into focus.

www.abc.net.au

What happens if Putin goes nuclear in Ukraine? Biden has a choice to make

Russian forces are in retreat yet Nato still holds back for fear of what a humiliated Putin might do. But now is precisely the time to step up the pressure

www.theguardian.com

If Biden's bizarre administration pushes Putin into the use of nuclear weapons it will put the US between a rock and hard place. The US will then have to choose beween providing nukes to Ukraine and starting WW3 or backing down in the eyes of the world.

Biden and the NATO countries will not start WWIII, Putin could.
If Trump was President, he would be sending armaments to his pal Putin and the Russian army. Trump would ignore NATO and the Ukraine. They did not help him steal the 2020 election. He would hand the keys to the US over to Putin. Trump loves Putin. Putin has all the power Trump wish he had in the US.

 

[MisterBeale]

one can feel it's presence ......

View attachment 751527
~S~

I find it unreal, that at the last G20, there was a Russian representative, meeting with leaders of the west, AND China, and they all agreed, that the ruling oligarchs, need to issue, a global digital ID, so they can eventually saddle us with vaccine passports when this WHO international health treaty is passed into force, and subverts national sovereignty in 2024.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/best-part-of-the-ukrainian-invasion.949769/page-165#post-30933113

Julia Davis (journalist) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Where Russia Fits In With Trump-Ukraine Affair

The war? Is a distraction. Utterly.

Despite criticism, Russia hails 'balanced' G20 leaders' declaration​

Despite criticism, Russia hails 'balanced' G20 leaders' declaration

Russia on Wednesday hailed the G20 leaders' declaration, which mentions the "immense human suffering" caused by the war in Ukraine, as a "balanced text" that Russian diplomats worked hard to influence.

www.reuters.com

From someone actually living inside of Russia, monitoring the media there;

Kherson withdrawal: Views from Russian media​

and deep thoughts from our podcast​

Kherson withdrawal: Views from Russian media

and deep thoughts from our podcast

edwardslavsquat.substack.com

"The article ends by expressing hope that the withdrawal is a trap set for the Ukrainian military, while acknowledging it may actually be part of a backroom deal between Moscow and Kiev (Washington)."

Maternal mortality in Russia tripled in 2021​

Why? Take a wild guess​

Maternal mortality in Russia tripled in 2021

Why? Take a wild guess

edwardslavsquat.substack.com

World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet​

Washington and Moscow put aside their differences for the greater good​

World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet

Washington and Moscow put aside their differences for the greater good

edwardslavsquat.substack.com

Multipolar World Order – Part 4​

Iain Davis​

Multipolar World Order – Part 4

Iain Davis Part 1 of this series looked at the various models of world order. Part 2 examined how the shift towards the multipolar world order has been led by some surprising characters. Part 3 exp…

off-guardian.org

The Wider Context of the Ukraine War​

". . . There is no evidence to suggest that the war in Ukraine is, in any sense, “fake.” The political and cultural differences among the populace of Ukraine are older than the nation-state, and the current conflict is rooted in long-standing and very real tensions. People are suffering and dying, and they deserve the chance to live in peace.

Yet, beyond the specific factors that led to and have perpetuated the conflict in Ukraine, there is a wider context that also deserves discussion.

The so-called leaders in the West and in the East have had ample opportunity and power to bring both sides in the Donbas war to the negotiating table. Their attempts to broker ceasefires and to implement the various Minsk agreements over the years were weak and half-hearted. Both sides, it seems, chose instead to play politics with Ukrainian lives. And both sides ultimately fuelled the conflict.

The West has done little but exacerbate the situation. And, though it faced a tough economic choice, the Russian government could certainly have leveraged its commanding position in the European energy market to better effect.

If, that is, avoiding war were the objective.

Whatever else it is, the war in Ukraine is the fulcrum for a transition in the balance of geopolitic power. Like the pseudopandemic that immediately preceded it, the war is accelerating the polarity shift. . . "

This pandemic treaty is the greatest power grab any of us has seen in our lifetime, says Neil Oliver​

.
.
.

Anyone that really thinks the war is between the US and Russia, or the West and the East? Isn't really paying attention. IMO.

 

[toobfreak]

If anyone started WW III it was Putin.

Really, for invading a tiny, unimportant country wanting to take back two small territories in it?

• Why didn't invading and taking the Crimea several years ago start WWIII then?
• Why didn't the Chinese start WWIII when they invaded and took over all of Tibet?
• Will they start WWIII when in a year or so they invade and take Taiwan?
• What about when the US took land from Mexico? WWIII?
• Certainly killing all the Indians, rounding up those left and herding them onto reservations under agreements they could not even read and were lied to about what was in them, certainly THAT started WWIII?
• But Biden leading NATO in a provocative military action sending everything but the kitchen sink into a NON-NATO country instead of trying to broker a peaceful deal, that had no bearing?

 

[sparky]

I find it unreal, that at the last G20, there was a Russian representative, meeting with leaders of the west, AND China, and they all agreed, that the ruling oligarchs, need to issue, a global digital ID, so they can eventually saddle us with vaccine passports when this WHO international health treaty is passed into force, and subverts national sovereignty in 2024.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/best-part-of-the-ukrainian-invasion.949769/page-165#post-30933113

Julia Davis (journalist) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Where Russia Fits In With Trump-Ukraine Affair

The war? Is a distraction. Utterly.

Despite criticism, Russia hails 'balanced' G20 leaders' declaration​

Despite criticism, Russia hails 'balanced' G20 leaders' declaration

Russia on Wednesday hailed the G20 leaders' declaration, which mentions the "immense human suffering" caused by the war in Ukraine, as a "balanced text" that Russian diplomats worked hard to influence.

www.reuters.com

From someone actually living inside of Russia, monitoring the media there;

Kherson withdrawal: Views from Russian media​

and deep thoughts from our podcast​

Kherson withdrawal: Views from Russian media

and deep thoughts from our podcast

edwardslavsquat.substack.com

"The article ends by expressing hope that the withdrawal is a trap set for the Ukrainian military, while acknowledging it may actually be part of a backroom deal between Moscow and Kiev (Washington)."

Maternal mortality in Russia tripled in 2021​

Why? Take a wild guess​

Maternal mortality in Russia tripled in 2021

Why? Take a wild guess

edwardslavsquat.substack.com

World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet​

Washington and Moscow put aside their differences for the greater good​

World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet

Washington and Moscow put aside their differences for the greater good

edwardslavsquat.substack.com

Multipolar World Order – Part 4​

Iain Davis​

Multipolar World Order – Part 4

Iain Davis Part 1 of this series looked at the various models of world order. Part 2 examined how the shift towards the multipolar world order has been led by some surprising characters. Part 3 exp…

off-guardian.org

The Wider Context of the Ukraine War​

". . . There is no evidence to suggest that the war in Ukraine is, in any sense, “fake.” The political and cultural differences among the populace of Ukraine are older than the nation-state, and the current conflict is rooted in long-standing and very real tensions. People are suffering and dying, and they deserve the chance to live in peace.

Yet, beyond the specific factors that led to and have perpetuated the conflict in Ukraine, there is a wider context that also deserves discussion.

The so-called leaders in the West and in the East have had ample opportunity and power to bring both sides in the Donbas war to the negotiating table. Their attempts to broker ceasefires and to implement the various Minsk agreements over the years were weak and half-hearted. Both sides, it seems, chose instead to play politics with Ukrainian lives. And both sides ultimately fuelled the conflict.

The West has done little but exacerbate the situation. And, though it faced a tough economic choice, the Russian government could certainly have leveraged its commanding position in the European energy market to better effect.

If, that is, avoiding war were the objective.

Whatever else it is, the war in Ukraine is the fulcrum for a transition in the balance of geopolitic power. Like the pseudopandemic that immediately preceded it, the war is accelerating the polarity shift. . . "

This pandemic treaty is the greatest power grab any of us has seen in our lifetime, says Neil Oliver​

.
.
.

Anyone that really thinks the war is between the US and Russia, or the West and the East? Isn't really paying attention. IMO.

Means to an end rings out Mr B

those that can rise above the jingoists realize all conflict on this rock boiled down to two basic goal....power & control

all that is needed is fear, the threat of being deprived from basic needs, and they'll gladly throw all the freedoms they have to the wind

imho, the most insidious metastasis of our own demise will be our ignorance of this

~S~

 

[mak2]

Really, for invading a tiny, unimportant country wanting to take back two small territories in it?

• Why didn't invading and taking the Crimea several years ago start WWIII then?
• Why didn't the Chinese start WWIII when they invaded and took over all of Tibet?
• Will they start WWIII when in a year or so they invade and take Taiwan?
• What about when the US took land from Mexico? WWIII?
• Certainly killing all the Indians, rounding up those left and herding them onto reservations under agreements they could not even read and were lied to about what was in them, certainly THAT started WWIII?
• But Biden leading NATO in a provocative military action sending everything but the kitchen sink into a NON-NATO country instead of trying to broker a peaceful deal, that had no bearing?

It is a small, unimportant capitalistic country. It is the money some kind of way.

 

[sparky]

Really, for invading a tiny, unimportant country wanting to take back two small territories in it?

• Why didn't invading and taking the Crimea several years ago start WWIII then?
• Why didn't the Chinese start WWIII when they invaded and took over all of Tibet?
• Will they start WWIII when in a year or so they invade and take Taiwan?
• What about when the US took land from Mexico? WWIII?
• Certainly killing all the Indians, rounding up those left and herding them onto reservations under agreements they could not even read and were lied to about what was in them, certainly THAT started WWIII?
• But Biden leading NATO in a provocative military action sending everything but the kitchen sink into a NON-NATO country instead of trying to broker a peaceful deal, that had no bearing?

i'd say the dif isn't a stretch Toob

think what's @ stake for the elites who've their fingers in these examples of yours

~S~