Do You Support The "Gun Show Loophole?"

[martybegan]

Did he turn off his rep, or could it have been something else? I wonder.

Which would imply he wasnt smart enough to read forum rules and tried to neg someone twice to quickly.

Either way it is a good indicator of his post quality.

That's a great rule, like they just can't set the parameters to not allow it. I guess changing that 24 hours to 48 is too hard to figure out.

You were the one who shut off/had your rep shut off.

Tutu Tutu Tutu Tutu.

 

[Crackerjaxon]

The government keeping closer tabs on people won't do a damned thing to prevent these atrocities. All it will do is tighten the cinch on personal liberty until the next fiasco. They they'll use that as an excuse to tighten the cinch a little more.

Liberals soundly reject thie idea of guarding children to keep them safe, unless, of course, they are the children of liberals.

Why shouldn't children in public schools be afforded the same protection as those in elite private schools?

 

[Dubya]

Yet instead of demanding current laws are enforced, which they are not, you being the poster boy statist want new more oppressive laws on the law abiding people. Because even you recognize that criminals will continue laughing at any law you pass. Good job commie boy, good job.

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

It is an INFRINGMENT, and will not make the world ANY safer. It will just get us closer to becoming government run lemmings, a state you seem to love.

Gun rights should only be lost for a felony or a judge related mental defect ruling. Anything else is banning by small cuts, and you know it.

I did a thread on the word infringed and it meant destroyed in those days. Broken in the sense of shattering a cup on the floor. It doesn't mean making gun control laws are infringing your rights. They aren't your rights, they are the right to not have the populace disarmed, period. That doesn't mean you can't disarm an individual.

 

[Dubya]

Yet instead of demanding current laws are enforced, which they are not, you being the poster boy statist want new more oppressive laws on the law abiding people. Because even you recognize that criminals will continue laughing at any law you pass. Good job commie boy, good job.

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

Screw you I only have to renew my CHL every 5 years. I've owned gun for 50 years and not one of them have hurt anyone. Why don't you put you energy in to law enforcement and leave everyone else alone. Criminal ain't going to register shit.

We want laws for society and not for you. If don't like it, move!

 

[OKTexas]

Did he turn off his rep, or could it have been something else? I wonder.

Which would imply he wasnt smart enough to read forum rules and tried to neg someone twice to quickly.

Either way it is a good indicator of his post quality.

That's a great rule, like they just can't set the parameters to not allow it. I guess changing that 24 hours to 48 is too hard to figure out.

It is 48, although some can't even wait 24, I heard of that recently.

 

[martybegan]

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

It is an INFRINGMENT, and will not make the world ANY safer. It will just get us closer to becoming government run lemmings, a state you seem to love.

Gun rights should only be lost for a felony or a judge related mental defect ruling. Anything else is banning by small cuts, and you know it.

I did a thread on the word infringed and it meant destroyed in those days. Broken in the sense of shattering a cup on the floor. It doesn't mean making gun control laws are infringing your rights. They aren't your rights, they are the right to not have the populace disarmed, period. That doesn't mean you can't disarm an individual.

Thats quite a strech...... and you can disarm an individual, ONLY after a conviction for a felony or a judge mandated mental commitment. What you are proposing is prior restraints on ownership, which is infringment, no matter what cup related definition you make up.

also if you go to the root french word, it is "break, or weaken"

1525–35; < Latin infringere to break, weaken, equivalent to in- in-2 + -fringere, combining form of frangere to break

 

[Dubya]

So, you want me to register guns I bought mail order in the 60's, guns my dad bought in the 30's, guns taken off the bodies of dead soldiers in WW II? I have guns that were legally purchased that don't have serial #'s.

Any requirement for registration of weapons now legally owned cannot be enforced.

I don't care about your problems or family history. The world wasn't built for only your pleasure.

Even antiques can be registered and they can be assigned a number or identified in some way.

I don't care about your problems either dumbo, other than I'm sorry to see you lost your rep. I will not register any weapon I obtained legally before such a law is enacted.
I predict a run on Home Depot for 6" PVC pipe and caps if such a law is passed. I'll need 80 feet and 3 dozen caps

Why cares if you register, because if that ever becomes law, you will lose the right to have any gun and your guns will be confiscated. If you want to go batshit crazy and die, because you're too stupid to read a constitutional amendment properly, then die. We're better off without you.

 

[OKTexas]

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

Screw you I only have to renew my CHL every 5 years. I've owned gun for 50 years and not one of them have hurt anyone. Why don't you put you energy in to law enforcement and leave everyone else alone. Criminal ain't going to register shit.

We want laws for society and not for you. If don't like it, move!

No worries, your pipe dreams will never come to pass, if I thought it would I'd be organizing the militia instead of playing with you.

 

[martybegan]

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

Screw you I only have to renew my CHL every 5 years. I've owned gun for 50 years and not one of them have hurt anyone. Why don't you put you energy in to law enforcement and leave everyone else alone. Criminal ain't going to register shit.

We want laws for society and not for you. If don't like it, move!

How about if you are so scared of lawful gun owners, YOU move to some place that regulates them like you want them?

Hell I'm sure we can get a drive going to buy you a one way plane ticket.

 

[Dubya]

Yet instead of demanding current laws are enforced, which they are not, you being the poster boy statist want new more oppressive laws on the law abiding people. Because even you recognize that criminals will continue laughing at any law you pass. Good job commie boy, good job.

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

But it is oppressive to make him prove he is eligible to cast his vote on ellection day.... Got it.

ID has always been required in my state, fool!

 

[asaratis]

It's not oppressive to make a gun owner show up once a year to prove he still has his weapons and allowing him to live in a safer world. It's oppressive when someone gets caught violating the law and gets their ass burnt for doing it. I support losing gun rights if the person is caught with an unregistered weapon and prosecuting the person for a weapons offense with more severe penalties from that point on.

It is an INFRINGMENT, and will not make the world ANY safer. It will just get us closer to becoming government run lemmings, a state you seem to love.

Gun rights should only be lost for a felony or a judge related mental defect ruling. Anything else is banning by small cuts, and you know it.

I did a thread on the word infringed and it meant destroyed in those days. Broken in the sense of shattering a cup on the floor. It doesn't mean making gun control laws are infringing your rights. They aren't your rights, they are the right to not have the populace disarmed, period. That doesn't mean you can't disarm an individual.

I did a thread on the word "W" (Dubya) one time and it meant "without" as meaning has nothing to offer worth reading. That doesn't mean you can't post here...just that your posts are completely and utterly meaningless!

There's a category of posters that you, Truthmatters, rdean and a few others belong to. It's called "Wasted Energy"!

 

[Dubya]

I don't care about your problems or family history. The world wasn't built for only your pleasure.

Even antiques can be registered and they can be assigned a number or identified in some way.

I don't care about your problems either dumbo, other than I'm sorry to see you lost your rep. I will not register any weapon I obtained legally before such a law is enacted.
I predict a run on Home Depot for 6" PVC pipe and caps if such a law is passed. I'll need 80 feet and 3 dozen caps

There will be no need, this dips pipe dreams will never be realized. Congress especially the senate don't want this fight. I just like giving the baby boy a hard time.

Congress will make a few changes and some states will make major changes. As time goes by more disasters from our gun laws will happen. Cities and states will notice how gun laws prevent killings and they will change their gun laws. The Republican Party will continue to decline and so will the influence of the NRA. The issue of gun control isn't going to go away.

 

[martybegan]

I don't care about your problems either dumbo, other than I'm sorry to see you lost your rep. I will not register any weapon I obtained legally before such a law is enacted.
I predict a run on Home Depot for 6" PVC pipe and caps if such a law is passed. I'll need 80 feet and 3 dozen caps

There will be no need, this dips pipe dreams will never be realized. Congress especially the senate don't want this fight. I just like giving the baby boy a hard time.

Congress will make a few changes and some states will make major changes. As time goes by more disasters from our gun laws will happen. Cities and states will notice how gun laws prevent killings and they will change their gun laws. The Republican Party will continue to decline and so will the influence of the NRA. The issue of gun control isn't going to go away.

And ther changes made by the state so far (NY) is unconsitutional. Whatever happened to equal protection under the law?

 

[Dubya]

Keep adding nothing to the conversation. You are the reason gun rights advocates dont trust gun control idiots one bit.

Who gives a **** what people who can't even read a simple amendment trust? They only have present power in a Congress they bought and they failed over 99% in the last election. You're kooks and you clowns aren't running this circus.

I can read it just fine, you just choose to ignore it.

I researched it and you didn't. You want it to say what you want it to say and not what it says.

 

[Crackerjaxon]

If you buy a gun from ANYONE, you should be required to undergo a background check.

I mean.................you have to liscence your car to run it on the roads, right?

Actually, you don't. There are all kinds of farm vehicles that aren't licensed because they are not used on public roads.

Schools, the last time I checked, are in loco parentis. They have the same duties as parents to protect the children in their care.

Why aren't the schools protecting our children? Why are they not taking precautions to prevent the cold-blooded murder of those in their charge?

While lame-brained liberals are running around trying to pass more restrictive laws on law-abiding citizens, our children remain at risk and the schools do nothing.

 

[Dubya]

So it would require every gun to be registered then, right?

You failed to bring that up in your previous posts.

Gun registration is a no go. You dont need to be registered to practice free speech, or your freedom of travel, or your right to a trial by jury.

Go an hero yourself.

I've only brought it up dozens of time.

You have the right to not have the populace disarmed, so figure it out, fool!

Registration is infringement, no matter how you try to spin it.

Tell it to the Supreme Court, they know how to read!

 

[martybegan]

Who gives a **** what people who can't even read a simple amendment trust? They only have present power in a Congress they bought and they failed over 99% in the last election. You're kooks and you clowns aren't running this circus.

I can read it just fine, you just choose to ignore it.

I researched it and you didn't. You want it to say what you want it to say and not what it says.

Nah, thats you. I am now leaning towards the "lack of cognative function" for your current viewpoints.

 

[martybegan]

I've only brought it up dozens of time.

You have the right to not have the populace disarmed, so figure it out, fool!

Registration is infringement, no matter how you try to spin it.

Tell it to the Supreme Court, they know how to read!

Just like they knew how to read Plessey V. Fergueson? And for some people, Citizen's United?

 

[OKTexas]

I don't care about your problems either dumbo, other than I'm sorry to see you lost your rep. I will not register any weapon I obtained legally before such a law is enacted.
I predict a run on Home Depot for 6" PVC pipe and caps if such a law is passed. I'll need 80 feet and 3 dozen caps

There will be no need, this dips pipe dreams will never be realized. Congress especially the senate don't want this fight. I just like giving the baby boy a hard time.

Congress will make a few changes and some states will make major changes. As time goes by more disasters from our gun laws will happen. Cities and states will notice how gun laws prevent killings and they will change their gun laws. The Republican Party will continue to decline and so will the influence of the NRA. The issue of gun control isn't going to go away.

CT already had most of those laws, how that work out. Do you have a learning disability, I wouldn't want to be picking on the handicapped.

 

[Dubya]

Tell me exactly how banning scary black guns and 30 round mags is going to prevent the next nut from shooting up a school.

Be specific. Tell me one thing you can do today that will prevent a school shooting 3 months in the future.

Assault weapons are the weapon of choice for shooting it out with the cops, which seldom happens. Handguns are what's generally used in homicides and rifles aren't. I don't think assault weapons are good for home defense, but they are fun to shoot at firing ranges or where you have a lot of land to shoot them safely. I never thought an assault weapons ban was a good idea, but limits on magazine size are in some places, maybe nationally. The smart way is to make these Title II weapons instead of a ban, but I believe weapons need a yearly check and ballistics test to make sure they aren't being trafficked to the wrong people.

It's you gun nuts caught up on Sandy Hook and you just can't figure out the American people have had enough of the gun violence your bullshit laws allow. Your bullshit ways don't work on rational thinking people.

I keep telling you idiots that when you behave so irresponsibly and try to keep everything as is, the people of this country are going to stick it up your ass and you do deserve it. When you can't be part of the solution, then you have made yourself part of the problem. Don't be surprised when people with less experience with guns make laws that show you no consideration. You didn't show them any consideration, so why should you get it. Our present laws will allow another disaster and it's just a matter of time.

Your dear leader is the only one acting irresponsibly, gun prosecutions are way down. And by rational people you mean the lemming easily swayed by the MSM that lack the ability to get the facts for themselves, right?

I don't watch TV, so your bullshit MSM argument is your fabrication. I got my facts by reading the personal letters of the Founders.

You're just a lying ass gun nut.