Do you support Muslims emigrating to the U.S.?

Do you support Muslims emigrating to the U.S.?


  • Total voters
    38
Prove you are right first, idiot.

No beat it if you aren't going to do anything original.
Do you support a group of religious people setting up their own country within the U.S.? If so, you are most assuredly wrong.
 
Dude, turn off the faux noize, put down the crack pipe, and detox.
I asked you a question that apparently you can't answer so you obfuscate and project nonsense.
 
Why am I a bigot?
eye_roll.gif


Go back to the beginning of the thread and see if you can figure it out.
 
How's it worked out for America in the past!!!
In the past we limited immigrants from other societies so they would assimilate. Growing up I almost never saw Islamic dress or turbans. Now they are not uncommon. E Pluribus Unum: Out of many, one. Now it's out of one, many.
 
The Muslims who work in my building, and there are maybe 10 or so out of about 150 people, are more courteous and unobtrusive than most other employees, plus they do a great job and don't cause trouble. It has been this way for years. One of our 5 managers is a Muslim. I would go to him for advice or support over a number of the others.
How observant are they? Do they demand time off to pray five times a day? Do they protest Christians and Jews eating non-halal foods? Do they protest the female employees wearing immodest clothes? Do they protest the other employees eating in their presence during Ramadan? Those are all things that Muslims demand when they become a large enough percentage of the group.

I have no problem with Muslims who keep their religion private, just as I have no problem with Christians who don't try to enlist me in their version of Christianity and won't take no for an answer.
 
If so, why? An inordinate number of Muslim immigrants do NOT assimilate to western societies. Additionally, an inordinate number of them commit horrific crimes, terrorism, monolithic fraud, and then demand that their host communities change their cultures to accommodate them. Not to mention that the American taxpayer has to pay through the nose to support them. I certainly don't support this. If you do, why?
I believe you offer (probably without intention) a false dichotomy.

In many cases, I oppose the immigration of Muslims into America.

In many other cases, I have no problem with it.

Thus, it is not a “yes / no” issue.

Valid immigrations laws should require scrupulous background checks on anyone trying to obtain legal authority to come here. Not just Muslims.

As regards “Muslims,” that background scrutiny would include finding out which country the applicant is from and which other countries s/he has lived in. Which schools did the applicant attend in those lands? Has the applicant ever suggested in words or deeds any hostility toward America as the “great Satan?” Does there appear to be any known association of that applicant with any Islamic Revolutionaries? Is there evidence of financial support for the applicant from any terrorist group or sponsors? Etc.

Some folks do deserve to have their applications denied.
 
Last edited:
15th post
I believe you offer (probably without intention) a false dichotomy.

In many cases, I oppose the immigration of Muslims into America.

In many other cases, I have no problem with it.

Thus, it is not a “yes / no” issue.

Valid immigrations laws should require scrupulous background checks on anyone trying to obtain legal authority to come here. Not just Muslims.

As regards “Muslims,” that background scrutiny would include finding out which country the applicant is from and which other countries s/he has lived in. Which schools did the applicant attend in those lands? Has the applicant ever suggested in words or deeds any hostility toward America as the “great Satan?” Does there appear to be any known association of that applicant with any Islamic Revolutionaries? Is there evidence of financial support for the applicant from any terrorist group or sponsors? Etc.

Some folks do deserve to have their applications denied.

Islam doesn't benefit the greater American community. I support bringing Afghan translators, etc., but the practice of admitting Muslims en masse is a hard no from me.
 
Some so-called "conservatives" dislike her because she is brash and unapologetic, not to mention that a big number of Republicans are also a part of the corrupt Washington Establishment.
Laura Elizabeth Loomer (born May 21, 1993) is an American far-right political activist, conspiracy theorist, and internet personality.
Wikipedia
 
As I said before, Islam is a political body with a religion whose goal is to establish it's laws over the country it exists in. In other words, they are a political enemy under the guise of their religion. They are an enemy to the country they live in.

You don't let the enemy in.

Quantrill
Change the Constitution. Require elected officials be Christians. see if you can get that done and maybe then you will be happy. The Constitution must be changed to limit Muslims from entry. That is why the so-called "Muslim ban" was pure fiction by the left. Citizenship in a foreign country can be restricted from immigration, but religion cannot. Libs didn't know that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom