Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,352
- 124,762
- 3,645
Obviously that's stupid and wrong.The Fed rate should be based on a mathematical proof, not what the Pharisees say it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obviously that's stupid and wrong.The Fed rate should be based on a mathematical proof, not what the Pharisees say it is.
Not a vote, but we all see the math. The Fed rate should be based on a mathematical proof, not what the Pharisees say it is.
Not the size of Greenspan's briefcase. (lots of papers meant cut, skinny briefcase meant no cut)
AOC has nothing to do with it.
It about the Fed showing us their math models.
The Fed has 300 economists who work to predict what rates should be. They suck at their job.What is a Fed math model?
What does that have to do with their audit by KPMG?
The Fed has 300 economists who work to predict what rates should be. They suck at their job.
The Greenspan model for interest rates refers to the monetary policies implemented by Alan Greenspan during his time as chair of the Federal Reserve, where he actively adjusted interest rates to stabilize the economy and prevent excessive stock market declines. This approach often involved lowering the federal funds rate to support economic growth and mitigate financial crises, which became known as the "Greenspan put."![]()
How Does the Fed Influence Interest Rates Using Its New Tools?
Post-financial crisis, interest on reserves became the primary tool for adjusting the fed funds rate. And the ON RRP rate is now a supplementary tool that acts as a 'floor.'www.stlouisfed.org
You'd have to ask Rand Paul and Rick Scott why they don't trust the KPMG audits.
![]()
Sens. Rick Scott, Rand Paul Lead Effort to Audit the Fed Amid Powell’s Failures
www.rickscott.senate.gov
They are of course excellent at their jobs and have maintained the most successful and stable econony in history.The Fed has 300 economists who work to predict what rates should be. They suck at their job.
Actually I think those 300 number crunchers use math models to predict what action would be the optimum, what the best rate should be.The Fed has 300 economists who work to predict what rates should be.
Do you mean "what rates will be"? Predicting "what rates should be" isn't a thing.
Actually I think those 300 number crunchers use math models to predict what action would be the optimum, what the best rate should be.
How the Board members actually vote may not reflect/support their recommended action, to cut, hold, or raise rates, i.e. what the actual rate will be.