Do You Support A Woman's Right To Choose?

[Damaged Eagle]

As far as being serious..............

I think if woman can murder a baby and the law looks the other way...........
I should be able to murder fuktards and snowflakes and the law looks the other way as well!!!!

It is not murder if it is legal.

Jim Crow was legal at one time also.

*****SMILE*****

 

[John T. Ford]

As far as being serious..............

I think if woman can murder a baby and the law looks the other way...........
I should be able to murder fuktards and snowflakes and the law looks the other way as well!!!!

It is not murder if it is legal.

View attachment 501008

Jim Crow was legal at one time also.

*****SMILE*****

You are responding to a Leftist who literally thinks it was illegal in NAZI Germany to "kill all those people" .....

But, I got your point loud and clear.

 

[Calypso Jones]

In order to understand the weightiness of this, one must have a respect for life. Since that is lacking in the left....kill your children. The right doesn't want to help by providing that service for you for free.

 

[John T. Ford]

What is the difference in the women in the two pictures above?

Either you support a woman's choice to do what she wants with her body or you don't.

Or, of course you could be selective in what a woman has the right to do with her own body.

And, that would be the position of most Leftist.

 

[Rye Catcher]

This is a hot topic among both sides these days, I think we can ALL agree on that.

The Left's position of course is that no one has the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body.

If she chooses to murder her unborn child than that should be her choice.

We are ALL clear on this position.

So my question to those on the Left is .....

Do you support a woman's right to choose if that choice is to not get the vaccine.

Is it still her body, her choice?

In short order:

• your thread is a False Equivalence and is a logical fallacy.
• murder, or homicide is the ILLEGAL taking of a human life. Thus R v. W is a legal medical procedure under the law, and therefore cannot be murder.

 

[John T. Ford]

This is a hot topic among both sides these days, I think we can ALL agree on that.

The Left's position of course is that no one has the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body.

If she chooses to murder her unborn child than that should be her choice.

We are ALL clear on this position.

So my question to those on the Left is .....

Do you support a woman's right to choose if that choice is to not get the vaccine.

Is it still her body, her choice?

In short order:

• your thread is a False Equivalence and is a logical fallacy.
• murder, or homicide is the ILLEGAL taking of a human life. Thus R v. W is a legal medical procedure under the law, and therefore cannot be murder.

Try reading the OP and then get back with me.

 

[Flash]

What a stupid question. Of course she has the right. Do men have the right?

It's not a stupid question .....

And, many here would say women or men should not have a choice.

Anyone who says a woman does not have the right is stupid, ignorant, do not respect women...

You are confused Moon Bat

What you stupid immoral asshole Libtards don't seem to understand is that there are two humans lives involved. One of them can't cry out "mommy please don't kill me, I promise not to be a bother".

You Moon Bat idiots don't know any more about Biology than you know about Ethics, History, Economics, Climate Science or the Constitution.

 

[bodecea]

This is a hot topic among both sides these days, I think we can ALL agree on that.

The Left's position of course is that no one has the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body.

If she chooses to murder her unborn child than that should be her choice.

We are ALL clear on this position.

So my question to those on the Left is .....

Do you support a woman's right to choose if that choice is to not get the vaccine.

Is it still her body, her choice?

Of course...until viability.

 

[Flash]

This is a hot topic among both sides these days, I think we can ALL agree on that.

The Left's position of course is that no one has the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body.

If she chooses to murder her unborn child than that should be her choice.

We are ALL clear on this position.

So my question to those on the Left is .....

Do you support a woman's right to choose if that choice is to not get the vaccine.

Is it still her body, her choice?

In short order:

• your thread is a False Equivalence and is a logical fallacy.
• murder, or homicide is the ILLEGAL taking of a human life. Thus R v. W is a legal medical procedure under the law, and therefore cannot be murder.

So the Nazis didn't murder the Jews because it was legal in Germany to do it?

You filthy Moon Bats don't know anymore about Ethics as you know about History, Economics, Climate Science, Biology or the Constitution.

 

[John T. Ford]

Of course...until viability.

And, so you also support her choice not to get the vaccine, I am gonna assume?

 

[Concerned American]

I think the question is heavily flawed mate.

Abortion means she's murdering an unborn child - therefore doing the damage to an innocent party and not herself.

Not getting the vaccine she's "potentially" doing damage to herself - which is her right - the same way if folk want to commit suicide, self-harm, take drugs, get addicted to alcohol it's their their right.

I suppose you could add a little complexity to the question and say if she's not vaccinated then she could, potentially, do harm to others too if she get's Covid and passes it on - but I'm working on the assumption everyone else (or the majority) will be vaccinated anyway, therefore protected.

The woman's choice is when she chooses to open her legs to unprotected sex or lack of birth control measures. Abortion is murder.

 

[John T. Ford]

A federal judge just ruled against over 100 Houston hospital workers who will be fired if they don't get the COVID-19 vaccine

Should these women have a choice what they do with their bodies?

 

[The Irish Ram]

Women have a choice of:
abstinence,
condoms,
birth CONTROL pills,
IUD's,
morning after pills
etc.
If she is stupid enough to get pregnant with all of that at her disposal, then her rights stop at conception and the new life's rights begin.

Bullshit.

By all means let's continue with the macabre. Birth the child, slit it's neck, take it to the death room where the mommy can rock her dying child and sing a lullaby or two, take a few pics, have a sip of wine and when the poor thing stops breathing, lay it in it's cutsie little coffin, with a little death certificate...

^ Because we are there...

 

[Scottish_Brexiteer_UK]

I think the question is heavily flawed mate.

Abortion means she's murdering an unborn child - therefore doing the damage to an innocent party and not herself.

Not getting the vaccine she's "potentially" doing damage to herself - which is her right - the same way if folk want to commit suicide, self-harm, take drugs, get addicted to alcohol it's their their right.

I suppose you could add a little complexity to the question and say if she's not vaccinated then she could, potentially, do harm to others too if she get's Covid and passes it on - but I'm working on the assumption everyone else (or the majority) will be vaccinated anyway, therefore protected.

The woman's choice is when she chooses to open her legs to unprotected sex or lack of birth control measures. Abortion is murder.

You'll find no disagreement with me on that.

I hate the way an unborn life is just an after-thought as it's an inconvenience.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Women have a choice of:
abstinence,
condoms,
birth CONTROL pills,
IUD's,
morning after pills
etc.
If she is stupid enough to get pregnant with all of that at her disposal, then her rights stop at conception and the new life's rights begin.

Bullshit.

Here is bullshit. This is a nurse's testimony about what is really happening:
...a nursing co-worker was transporting a baby who had been aborted because he had Down syndrome to our Soiled Utility Room to die – because that’s where survivors were taken. I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone, so I rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived. He was 21 to 22 weeks old, weighed about 1/2 pound, and was about the size of my hand. He was too weak to move very much, expending all his energy attempting to breathe.

Now that they can sell them as parts, they rip them apart in the womb to harvest the body sections. Do you know that infants have nerve endings and pain receptors too? Would it hurt to rip your leg off?
How much better that we should return to sacrificing them by throwing them off cliffs. That is much more humane.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Women have a choice of:
abstinence,
condoms,
birth CONTROL pills,
IUD's,
morning after pills
etc.
If she is stupid enough to get pregnant with all of that at her disposal, then her rights stop at conception and the new life's rights begin.

you forgot:
rape
incest
medical issues
i guess that don't count in your little world
If you are stupid enough.........

Forgot none of it. Unfortunate events, none of which should be compounded by murder. Rape can be resolved the morning after. As for incest or a medical issue, there are a lot of people that would take a child of incest or medical problems and raise it. Murdering the child should not be an option.

 

[Man of Ethics]

My opinion may be controversial for both sides.

Women should have a Legal Right to abortion.

Others should have an Ethical Right to view those who commit abortion as murderers. Not to do anything illegal to them, but just to view them as killers.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Like Senator John McCain was a senator. But anyone could keep in mind that he has killed several civilians.

 

[Scottish_Brexiteer_UK]

Women have a choice of:
abstinence,
condoms,
birth CONTROL pills,
IUD's,
morning after pills
etc.
If she is stupid enough to get pregnant with all of that at her disposal, then her rights stop at conception and the new life's rights begin.

Bullshit.

Here is bullshit. This is a nurse's testimony about what is really happening:
...a nursing co-worker was transporting a baby who had been aborted because he had Down syndrome to our Soiled Utility Room to die – because that’s where survivors were taken. I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone, so I rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived. He was 21 to 22 weeks old, weighed about 1/2 pound, and was about the size of my hand. He was too weak to move very much, expending all his energy attempting to breathe.

Now that they can sell them as parts, they rip them apart in the womb to harvest the body sections. Do you know that infants have nerve endings and pain receptors too? Would it hurt to rip your leg off?
How much better that we should return to sacrificing them by throwing them off cliffs. That is much more humane.

and the left that will shout at you and scream it doesn't matter etc just go on to prove to any sane-mind person that they're truly the most despicable folk on earth.

But hey, woman's body woman's choice etc etc

 

[Scottish_Brexiteer_UK]

My opinion may be controversial for both sides.

Women should have a Legal Right to abortion.

Others should have an Ethical Right to view those who commit abortion as murderers. Not to do anything illegal to them, but just to view them as killers.

That makes no sense. Your fence sitting makes you look idiotic.

If someone has an ethical right to view this as murder (which you agree with yourself) you can't also say woman have a right to commit these murders. You're essentially saying murder is fine.