Do YOU personally believe the Egyptians built the pyramids and great monuments in egypt or did tgey "INHERENT" them from a previous culture?

Did Egyptians build the great monuments in Giza?

  • Yes

  • No, I think they inherited much if not all of the major monuments

  • I don't know but am open to opinions from both camps


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remodeling Maidiac

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2011
101,230
46,282
2,315
Kansas City
What say you?

I don't believe for 1 second that the Egyptians built ANY of the great monuments in Egypt. Just like I don't believe the Peruvians built Machu Picchu.

Imo sophisticated human History predates what we were taught by tens of thousands of years if not hundreds of thousands.

I also believe A LOT of the biblical stories are real but not in the way Christians portray them. Most of the biblical stories are ROOTED in stories that have been co-opted from previous cultures that lived thousands of years earlier.

Our history is NOT what we've been taught.

Also check out this podcast if you have some time. It is long and meanders a bit but is pretty spot on for the most part imo. His final points I believe are quite far fetched however. We are FAR FROM being able to protect our planet from the cyclical disasters that befall humans every 13k years.

 
No way Egyptians built the Pyramids

They were built on distant planets and flown to Egypt

1650494331693.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The pyramids, when they were finished, were covered in limestone. Imagine the pyramids a gleaming white, that's what they used to be. Earthquakes loosened them, wind and sand wore away at them, and they still were there for over 3000 years before being removed and used elsewhere.
 
Is it difficult for you to stack blocks up? ... not sure what the problem is, we don't see the arch until Roman times ... so there's nothing about any of the Egyptian buildings that couldn't have been done exactly the way the Egyptians said it was done ... the technology for stonework was available to stone-age peoples ... that's why we call them "stone-aged peoples" ... because they worked with stone ...

Sounds like you're convoluting the story about the Sphinx statue ... there is some evidence that this monument is older than the main pyramids at Giza ... the only thing that can be said for sure is that there was some kind of temple at this site before the 4th Dynasty ... so perhaps there had already been some carving at the Sphinx site by this time ... however, workers greatly re-carved it during the 4th Dynasty, and it was completely re-furbished during Roman rule ... and it was Napoleon who had the Sphinx dug out beginning of the 19th Century ...

Who would be living in Egypt other than the Egyptians? ...
 
Is it difficult for you to stack blocks up? ... not sure what the problem is, we don't see the arch until Roman times ... so there's nothing about any of the Egyptian buildings that couldn't have been done exactly the way the Egyptians said it was done ... the technology for stonework was available to stone-age peoples ... that's why we call them "stone-aged peoples" ... because they worked with stone ...

Sounds like you're convoluting the story about the Sphinx statue ... there is some evidence that this monument is older than the main pyramids at Giza ... the only thing that can be said for sure is that there was some kind of temple at this site before the 4th Dynasty ... so perhaps there had already been some carving at the Sphinx site by this time ... however, workers greatly re-carved it during the 4th Dynasty, and it was completely re-furbished during Roman rule ... and it was Napoleon who had the Sphinx dug out beginning of the 19th Century ...

Who would be living in Egypt other than the Egyptians? ...
The Bangles?

 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Is it difficult for you to stack blocks up? ... not sure what the problem is, we don't see the arch until Roman times ... so there's nothing about any of the Egyptian buildings that couldn't have been done exactly the way the Egyptians said it was done ... the technology for stonework was available to stone-age peoples ... that's why we call them "stone-aged peoples" ... because they worked with stone ...

Sounds like you're convoluting the story about the Sphinx statue ... there is some evidence that this monument is older than the main pyramids at Giza ... the only thing that can be said for sure is that there was some kind of temple at this site before the 4th Dynasty ... so perhaps there had already been some carving at the Sphinx site by this time ... however, workers greatly re-carved it during the 4th Dynasty, and it was completely re-furbished during Roman rule ... and it was Napoleon who had the Sphinx dug out beginning of the 19th Century ...

Who would be living in Egypt other than the Egyptians? ...
Sumarians. And the erosion on the sphinx enclosure predates the Egyptians by THOUSANDS of years
 
Sumarians. And the erosion on the sphinx enclosure predates the Egyptians by THOUSANDS of years

Sumaria is in the Levant ... Egypt is in Egypt ...

I read the guy's book ... and he does make a great case for the "older Sphinx" ... though the evidence for ten's of thousands of years is lacking, thousands wouldn't be outside our understanding of pre-dynastic Egypt ... the rock itself has been there for millions of years ... and it would have been a major landmark where the Nile River empties into her vast and rich delta region ... this is already an important place at the dawn of history ...

But all this is based on the assumption Egyptians built the pyramids ... the Sphinx was carved, not built ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top