Do You Know You Are Voting To End Private Ownership?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
131,963
Reaction score
67,728
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats
And Donald Trump, don't forget Trump. He has no problem abolishing private property, rather from land owners near the border, or some little old widow lady living in her house where Trump wants to build a parking lot. And almost from the get go, One of Trump's first EO's was the declaration of an energy emergency, and an open admission that "abolishing private property rights", the use of Eminent Domain to confiscate private property with potential mineral wealth, was on the table.
 
And Donald Trump, don't forget Trump. He has no problem abolishing private property, rather from land owners near the border, or some little old widow lady living in her house where Trump wants to build a parking lot. And almost from the get go, One of Trump's first EO's was the declaration of an energy emergency, and an open admission that "abolishing private property rights", the use of Eminent Domain to confiscate private property with potential mineral wealth, was on the table.


Did you write this, low-life????


"Asian is not white, GTFO."

Forsyth And Trump's Travel Ban post #2
 
I see one Democrat posted "Fake News"


I never post anything that isn't true.



1. The French Revolution, which gave rise to the Russian Revolution, and that of Mao. Rousseau believed private property was the cause of the corruption of the human character, and private property should be abolished, and ending it would purify humanity. He believed that any who disagreed with the general will should be treated like a wild beast (killed). Government used terror as a policy.


2. A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist, and has had an enormous impact. He wrote: “The French Revolution was nothing but a precursor of another revolution, on which will be bigger, more solemn, and which will be the last…We reach for something more sublime and more just: the common good or the community of goods! Nor more individual property in land: the land belongs to no one. We demand, we want, the common enjoyment of the fruits of the land: the fruits belong to all.” Here, then, are the major themes of socialist theory. It takes very little interpolation to find that opponents profit at the expense of the environment, and conditions of inequality in society."


3. "Karl Marx<a href="Karl Marx - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>a<span>]</span></a> (German: [ˈkaʁl ˈmaʁks]; 5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) was a German philosopher, political theorist, economist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. He is best-known for the 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto (written with Friedrich Engels), and his three-volume Das Kapital (1867–1894), a critique of classical political economy which employs his theory of historical materialism in an analysis of capitalism, in the culmination of his life's work." Wikipedia
Marx inspired both Hitler and Lenin

A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the documentary "The Soviet Story")


4. Lenin, Hitler, Stallin, Mao, Pol Pot Castro, etc.



5. Democrat mayoralty candidate for NYC, Mamdani, supported and endorsed by major Democrat officials.
The Mamdani Democrat party stands for abolishing private property, socialist/communist, anti-Semitism, and racism.
And a Dem Senator said this should be the direction of the party.
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.

Mostly scare tactics.

But when it comes to NYC...

no more shits to give nuke.webp
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.
This is a stupid thread made by a stupid person for stupid people
 
Communism and its abolition of private property is one of the most misguided concepts ever devised by man. It completely ignores human nature. When people are free to choose, the majority will only produce what they need for the moment. That means a little extra when times are good, but when times inevitably turn bad, everyone ends up starving. It’s fundamentally flawed. People must be incentivized to work toward the future. Otherwise, everyone suffers. Those who lack the foresight to plan will demand to take what little the prepared have, leading to collective ruin.

People have to see a reward for their labor; otherwise, they will not produce. That's just basic human nature.
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.
Yes the democrat party USA has been long ago hijacked by the statist left marxinazi cult for sure. Of course there would have to be the god cla$$, better known a$ the g'ment elite! Does history repeat itself or what?!
 
15th post
Communism and its abolition of private property is one of the most misguided concepts ever devised by man. It completely ignores human nature. When people are free to choose, the majority will only produce what they need for the moment. That means a little extra when times are good, but when times inevitably turn bad, everyone ends up starving. It’s fundamentally flawed. People must be incentivized to work toward the future. Otherwise, everyone suffers. Those who lack the foresight to plan will demand to take what little the prepared have, leading to collective ruin.

People have to see a reward for their labor; otherwise, they will not produce. That's just basic human nature.
An insightful post.

I am sorry that you haven't posted far more frequently.


a. May I add that the Leftf/socialists/communists ideology begins with one grand lie: that they can alter human character by their policies (that they are equivalent to God):


b. Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person (Russian: новый советский человек), as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.<a href="New Soviet man - Wikipedia">[1]</a>

en.wikipedia.org

New Soviet man - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution <a href="New Soviet man - Wikipedia">[2]</a> :

"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will"

New Soviet man - Wikipedia



c. “And they said you’d be a proud one. Still the Comintern movie star. The vanity, the narcissism, the love of self. That is why you’ll never be a true Soviet man. You can’t let the love affair you have with your mirror go; you’re too used to being special.” From the novel “Havana,” Stephen Hunter



d. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

e. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris




f. In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffa..._____________________________________________
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.
What Loony Bin Hogwash.

In places like Vienna, the Socialists have enacted this without killing off private ownership :auiqs.jpg:do try and keep up

 
Back
Top Bottom