Do You Know You Are Voting To End Private Ownership?

I don't really care
Yet you want great salaries and benefits for everyone. The younger generations are suffering as the older ones are collecting great pensions and benefits with many of them not that good when they worked.
 
Yet you want great salaries and benefits for everyone. The younger generations are suffering as the older ones are collecting great pensions and benefits with many of them not that good when they worked.
Really?

Who said that's what I want?

You have obviously mistaken Dante for somebody who gives two shits

:auiqs.jpg:
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.
.

Except THEIR private ownership, as usual.

Anyone who votes for these losers is nothing but a tool.

.

.
 
Not all Democrats are Progressives

next
The leadership of the party is.

Golden is the hope of the party.

Not you.
PoliticalChic has never, ever allowed an inconvenient fact to get in the way of one of her inane arguments. Not ever.


Everything I post is linked, documented and correct.

You are the danger to the party, an automaton unable to think beyound what the Progressive, Far Left leaders tell you to.

I want a strong, pro-America Demoocrat Party.......you want another landslide defeat.
 
The leadership of the party is.

Golden is the hope of the party.

Not you.



Everything I post is linked, documented and correct.

You are the danger to the party, an automaton unable to think beyound what the Progressive, Far Left leaders tell you to.

I want a strong, pro-America Demoocrat Party.......you want another landslide defeat.
most of your links are as fruity as you are
 
most of your links are as fruity as you are
The Democrat moderates that I named who don't want to see another avalanche defeat by the other party?????


I have always said that Leftism infantilizes their voters.....you are a case in point.
 
The Democrat moderates that I named who don't want to see another avalanche defeat by the other party?????


I have always said that Leftism infantilizes their voters.....you are a case in point.
"infantilizes their voters?" Good Grief!

good grief Trump Daddy.webp
 
"Golden is not the only member of the Democratic Caucus to break ranks on the shutdown vote. On Tuesday evening, three members—Sens. John Fetterman (D-PA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), and Independent Angus King (ME), who caucuses with Democrats—voted with Republicans to avert the shutdown.

All three issued statements defending their vote. Fetterman said his vote “was for our country over my party,” while Cortez Masto stated she could not support a shutdown that “would hurt Nevada families and hand even more power to this reckless administration.” King argued that by shutting the government, Democrats are “actually giving [President] Donald Trump more power.”
 
It is going to be hilarious when Mamdani wins the election and I would give nearly anything to see the look on the OP's face :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
Let's clarify for you, you buffoon.

1. I expect the Communist Democrat to win.

2. I expect the Republicans to trumpet how the mainstream Democrats ran a communisst.

3. How do you suppose that will play in a national election?

4. Here's the best part, you imbecile: I actually want a re-vitalized, sane, pro-American Democrat Party in this nation.

. And thank you for coming by....until now, I had never met the result of a first cousin marriage.
 
Watch how easily I prove, again, that I am never wrong.
If it weren't for your lies you'd have nothing to offer the USMB.

A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the documentary "The Soviet Story")
You might be the only person left who believes what the Nazi minister of propaganda has to say.

Adolf Hitler used the perceived threat of communists as a key justification for the 1923 Munich Putsch, framing his coup attempt as a patriotic act to save Germany from a "Judeo-Bolshevik" conspiracy. This was part of a larger, long-term strategy of using anti-communism to attract support, intimidate opponents, and ultimately dismantle German democracy.
 
15th post
If it weren't for your lies you'd have nothing to offer the USMB.


You might be the only person left who believes what the Nazi minister of propaganda has to say.

Adolf Hitler used the perceived threat of communists as a key justification for the 1923 Munich Putsch, framing his coup attempt as a patriotic act to save Germany from a "Judeo-Bolshevik" conspiracy. This was part of a larger, long-term strategy of using anti-communism to attract support, intimidate opponents, and ultimately dismantle German democracy.
Speaking of "believinng"........

....you are the low-life vermin who made up a series of lies about me, and couldn't defend a single one....

I hope your name is Herman so it rhymes with what you are.



You posted a series of lies about me.....





"That is exactly NOT what you want.



You want to go back to a time when gays couldn't marry and had to hide in the closet.

You want to go back to a time when you got health care only if you could afford it.

You want to go back to a time when the only religions allowed were Jewish and Christian.

You want to go back to a time when racial and sex discrimination was accepted practice.

You want to go back to a time when all charity came from the religion you belonged to.

You want to go back to a time when pollution was an accepted part of business.

I could go on. Get Ready For A One-Party Nation post# 118



If you can't produce any quotes of mine that support your statements, then you are what you always were, a lying sack of offal.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of "believinng"........

....you are the low-life vermin who make up a series of lies about me, and couldn't defend a single one....

I hope your name is Herman so it rhymes with what you are.



You posted a series of lies about me.....





"That is exactly NOT what you want.



You want to go back to a time when gays couldn't marry and had to hide in the closet.

You want to go back to a time when you got health care only if you could afford it.

You want to go back to a time when the only religions allowed were Jewish and Christian.

You want to go back to a time when racial and sex discrimination was accepted practice.

You want to go back to a time when all charity came from the religion you belonged to.

You want to go back to a time when pollution was an accepted part of business.

I could go on. Get Ready For A One-Party Nation post# 118



If you can't produce any quotes of mine that support your statements, then you are what you always were, a lying sack of offal.
I'm honored that you document my accusations and I'm embarrassed that I don't keep a record of every post you've ever made. Also, I'm saddened that you have never denied ANY of the accusations.
 
Who supports abolishing private property?
Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Mamdani, Governor Hochul, Jerry Nadler, mainstream Democrats




1. In "one of Mamdani's most recent controversies: his use of the phrase "seizing the means of production," a foundational pillar of socialist and communist ideology.


2. Philosopher Friedrich Engels, co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his book, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, that when a society takes over the means of production, "production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of product over the producer."


3. The government taking over the means of production ultimately leads to the end of private ownership of property. A person no longer owns anything, including the fruits of their labor."



4. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows"



5. "Like all socialists, Mamdani also wants to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods. A higher tax for some individuals based on class and race? Sounds a bit bigoted, doesn't it? "
PJ Media



This is not what the Democrat Party was.....it has been taken over by radicals.
It doesn not deserve your vote any longer.
When you buy a house, you never really own it; the government does. You pay the government a tax to be allowed to live on a piece of property.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom