- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,495
- 10,067
- 900
No what we are pointing out with the Clintons is hypocrisy in action.Those who want money to be free speech are the same ones declaring the criminality of money supposedly buying influence with the Clintons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No what we are pointing out with the Clintons is hypocrisy in action.Those who want money to be free speech are the same ones declaring the criminality of money supposedly buying influence with the Clintons.
I don't hate anyone. What I am annoyed at is the fact that we continue to devolve into binary thinking, this or that, either/or.
The problem is that there are many influential people who do appear to hate either government or corporations, and they have lost all sense of equilibrium.
Problems can't be solved without communication, and communication can't happen when both "sides" are screaming and pointing the finger.
.
You do know that both "sides" say that, right?I don't hate anyone. What I am annoyed at is the fact that we continue to devolve into binary thinking, this or that, either/or.
The problem is that there are many influential people who do appear to hate either government or corporations, and they have lost all sense of equilibrium.
Problems can't be solved without communication, and communication can't happen when both "sides" are screaming and pointing the finger.
.
There's no need to "communicate" with the people who are destroying society. They need to be defeated.
No what we are pointing out with the Clintons is hypocrisy in action.Those who want money to be free speech are the same ones declaring the criminality of money supposedly buying influence with the Clintons.
You do know that both "sides" say that, right?I don't hate anyone. What I am annoyed at is the fact that we continue to devolve into binary thinking, this or that, either/or.
The problem is that there are many influential people who do appear to hate either government or corporations, and they have lost all sense of equilibrium.
Problems can't be solved without communication, and communication can't happen when both "sides" are screaming and pointing the finger.
.
There's no need to "communicate" with the people who are destroying society. They need to be defeated.
What would "defeated" look like?
.
The guilty party is well known. It is the oligarchy.You do know that both "sides" say that, right?I don't hate anyone. What I am annoyed at is the fact that we continue to devolve into binary thinking, this or that, either/or.
The problem is that there are many influential people who do appear to hate either government or corporations, and they have lost all sense of equilibrium.
Problems can't be solved without communication, and communication can't happen when both "sides" are screaming and pointing the finger.
.
There's no need to "communicate" with the people who are destroying society. They need to be defeated.
What would "defeated" look like?
.
You're belief that both sides are wrong isn't supported by logic or the facts. Obviously, if society is swirling down the drain, then someone is responsible. The only thing we have to do is determine who is the guilty party.
It's We the People who are allowing this travesty.The guilty party is well known. It is the oligarchy.You do know that both "sides" say that, right?I don't hate anyone. What I am annoyed at is the fact that we continue to devolve into binary thinking, this or that, either/or.
The problem is that there are many influential people who do appear to hate either government or corporations, and they have lost all sense of equilibrium.
Problems can't be solved without communication, and communication can't happen when both "sides" are screaming and pointing the finger.
.
There's no need to "communicate" with the people who are destroying society. They need to be defeated.
What would "defeated" look like?
.
You're belief that both sides are wrong isn't supported by logic or the facts. Obviously, if society is swirling down the drain, then someone is responsible. The only thing we have to do is determine who is the guilty party.
It's We the People who are allowing this travesty.The guilty party is well known. It is the oligarchy.You do know that both "sides" say that, right?I don't hate anyone. What I am annoyed at is the fact that we continue to devolve into binary thinking, this or that, either/or.
The problem is that there are many influential people who do appear to hate either government or corporations, and they have lost all sense of equilibrium.
Problems can't be solved without communication, and communication can't happen when both "sides" are screaming and pointing the finger.
.
There's no need to "communicate" with the people who are destroying society. They need to be defeated.
What would "defeated" look like?
.
You're belief that both sides are wrong isn't supported by logic or the facts. Obviously, if society is swirling down the drain, then someone is responsible. The only thing we have to do is determine who is the guilty party.
Kim Kardashian is more important than the oligarchy.
.
There is only one place where we need more government, and that is in the DMV. That place is always crowded and wait times are unreal, there may be other places like that, that I have yet to visit, I have heard horror stories about the Social Security administration.
On the flip side, you can always find plenty of workers doing nothing, when they work in the construction side of the U.S. Government. Just go by a local asphalt plant and see for yourself.
I don't actually hate big government. Hate is the wrong word. I know that big government is the enemy of freedom, of productivity, and prosperity.
I don't hate all big businesses. Big business that fights the government in order to prevent it from hampering progress and productivity is a good thing.
So yeah, big business is often in bed with government, but it often fights government and that is usually good for everyone.
It's We the People who are allowing this travesty.The guilty party is well known. It is the oligarchy.You do know that both "sides" say that, right?There's no need to "communicate" with the people who are destroying society. They need to be defeated.
What would "defeated" look like?
.
You're belief that both sides are wrong isn't supported by logic or the facts. Obviously, if society is swirling down the drain, then someone is responsible. The only thing we have to do is determine who is the guilty party.
Kim Kardashian is more important than the oligarchy.
.
I don't actually hate big government. Hate is the wrong word. I know that big government is the enemy of freedom, of productivity, and prosperity.
I don't hate all big businesses. Big business that fights the government in order to prevent it from hampering progress and productivity is a good thing.
So yeah, big business is often in bed with government, but it often fights government and that is usually good for everyone.
Well it's 2015.
Big Business buys politicians to prevent big Regulation. It's common sense.
Right Wing are generally Religious. Guess who is the biggest donor for Romney. Gambling. Something against Christianity.
Yes, If I ran a business in 2015 I would buy a politician! You can use $ to suggest regulation on competititon and sometimes if you get big enough use tax money to fund your Business. BAILOUTS!
It use to be against the law to have monopolies. Today anti-Corporate dinners are getting ransacked by big government where they attack farmers for sharing produce. It's never been attacked at home but entire communities eating free is not what big Corp. wants and has used law against it.
There is only one place where we need more government, and that is...