Do you consider LGBTQ lifestyles/choices a mental disorder?

Do you consider LGBTQ issues a mental deficiency?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.
[/QUOTE]
There should be an experiment as to how effective the EPA is...or isn't. Take away its powers....in red states. Let's watch the experiment proceed.[/QUOTE]
I wish that it can be done. That will be a peers review that will show the truth. But Monsanto doesn't allows anyone to do a peers review on their products, except for universities that they has been funding over the years.

Pruitt's EPA Defending Monsanto's Glyphosate Herbicides
Pruitt's EPA Defending Monsanto's Glyphosate Herbicides




 
We drug kids for being hyper(being normal).
We have drugs for depression.
We have drugs for OCD.
We have drugs for stress.
We have drugs for schizophrenia.
We have drugs for bipplar.

The list goes on and on. But we dont treat people who think they are something they clearly are not or people who think unnatural behavior is okay?
They aren't.

However phobias are.
As in phobias of REALITY? Like thinking you are a man when you're really a woman?
You should do some reading on the subject. It's a little complicated. Can you handle complicated?
 
We drug kids for being hyper(being normal).
We have drugs for depression.
We have drugs for OCD.
We have drugs for stress.
We have drugs for schizophrenia.
We have drugs for bipplar.

The list goes on and on. But we dont treat people who think they are something they clearly are not or people who think unnatural behavior is okay?
Developmental disorders....Not right, not wrong...But also not deserving of any special societal dispensation.

Correct. They should be treated the same as anyone else.
I never said they should be treated differently. I implied they should be treated. Just like people with other diseases or disorders.
Then you agree that they should be allowed to marry the person who they love ?
 
Developmental disorders....Not right, not wrong...But also not deserving of any special societal dispensation.
The problem is the LGBTQ political movement demands special accommodations and deference. And it bullies and attacks anyone who will not knuckle under.
Jordan Peterson call tell you what happens when you decide not to capitulate to bullies.
Oh yes, there is that "special treatment" crap again. Let me ask a couple of questions

Gays sued to win the right to marry the one who they love just like heterosexuals. They have equality. How is that special?
Laws have been passed to prohibit discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations. Yes, they were passed to protect LGBT people but they apply equally to everyone. A gay person cant discriminate against a straight person either. Where is the special treatment?
 
Developmental disorders....Not right, not wrong...But also not deserving of any special societal dispensation.
The problem is the LGBTQ political movement demands special accommodations and deference. And it bullies and attacks anyone who will not knuckle under.
Jordan Peterson call tell you what happens when you decide not to capitulate to bullies.
Oh yes, there is that "special treatment" crap again. Let me ask a couple of questions

Gays sued to win the right to marry the one who they love just like heterosexuals. They have equality. How is that special?
Laws have been passed to prohibit discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations. Yes, they were passed to protect LGBT people but they apply equally to everyone. A gay person cant discriminate against a straight person either. Where is the special treatment?
Bullshit...Gays sued for the privilege of getting state-issued marriage licenses...Statutory marriage is a privilege, not a right...Were it a right, you wouldn't need a license.

But you ignoramus clowns are so blinded by your GIBSMEDATS!, that you idiotically sued to gain equal servitude rather than demanding your natural rights under common law.

Legal Dictionary - Law.com
 
Developmental disorders....Not right, not wrong...But also not deserving of any special societal dispensation.
The problem is the LGBTQ political movement demands special accommodations and deference. And it bullies and attacks anyone who will not knuckle under.
Jordan Peterson call tell you what happens when you decide not to capitulate to bullies.
Oh yes, there is that "special treatment" crap again. Let me ask a couple of questions

Gays sued to win the right to marry the one who they love just like heterosexuals. They have equality. How is that special?
Laws have been passed to prohibit discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations. Yes, they were passed to protect LGBT people but they apply equally to everyone. A gay person cant discriminate against a straight person either. Where is the special treatment?
Bullshit...Gays sued for the privilege of getting state-issued marriage licenses...Statutory marriage is a privilege, not a right...Were it a right, you wouldn't need a license.

But you ignoramus clowns are so blinded by your GIBSMEDATS!, that you idiotically sued to gain equal servitude rather than demanding your natural rights under common law.

Legal Dictionary - Law.com
I've tried to school you on your bullshit before but apparently you are unable to benefit from education. Once again, the issue of right vs. privilege is irrelevant as is the issue of state licenses . They are red herring fallacies to distract from the real issue which is equality vs. discrimination. The fact is that heterosexuals were able to take for granted the right ( or privilege or whatever the **** you want to call it) while gays could not. Yes it is that simple.
 
I've tried to school you on you bullshit before but apparently you are unable to benefit from education. Once again, the issue of right vs. privilege is irrelevant as is the issue of state licenses . They are red herring fallacies to distract from the real issue which is equality vs. discrimination. The fact is that heterosexuals were able to take for granted the right ( or privilege or whatever the **** you want to call it) while gays could not. Yes it is that simple.
You can't school me on jack shit, poofboi....I've studied statutory marriage, along with a lot of other sneaky shit The State does to con you into making them a "partner" in your private affairs, for decades.

You're a fool's fool...So willingly ignorant that you don't even know that you don't know.
 
I've tried to school you on you bullshit before but apparently you are unable to benefit from education. Once again, the issue of right vs. privilege is irrelevant as is the issue of state licenses . They are red herring fallacies to distract from the real issue which is equality vs. discrimination. The fact is that heterosexuals were able to take for granted the right ( or privilege or whatever the **** you want to call it) while gays could not. Yes it is that simple.
You can't school me on jack shit, poofboi....I've studied statutory marriage, along with a lot of other sneaky shit The State does to con you into making them a "partner" in your private affairs, for decades.

You're a fool's fool...So willingly ignorant that you don't even know that you don't know.
You're still avoiding the central issue because you don't have an answer to it. You throw as much dung at the wall as you can to see what sticks. No matter what you know or think you know about marriage it does not change the fact that gays had been denied equal protection under the law and due process, and the states could not come up with a compelling state interest or even a rational basis for doing so
 
Then stay out of those gay bars and away from pride parades
Pride parades are public functions! What other rights would you like people to just forgo, besides freedom of movement, so gays can have their way?
Nice try but I didn't say that you don't have aright to go. I"m only suggesting that you choose not to go if they offend you so.
 
I've tried to school you on you bullshit before but apparently you are unable to benefit from education. Once again, the issue of right vs. privilege is irrelevant as is the issue of state licenses . They are red herring fallacies to distract from the real issue which is equality vs. discrimination. The fact is that heterosexuals were able to take for granted the right ( or privilege or whatever the **** you want to call it) while gays could not. Yes it is that simple.
You can't school me on jack shit, poofboi....I've studied statutory marriage, along with a lot of other sneaky shit The State does to con you into making them a "partner" in your private affairs, for decades.

You're a fool's fool...So willingly ignorant that you don't even know that you don't know.
You're still avoiding the central issue because you don't have an answer to it. You throw as much dung at the wall as you can to see what sticks. No matter what you know or think you know about marriage it does not change the fact that gays had been denied equal protection under the law and due process, and the states could not come up with a compelling state interest or even a rational basis for doing so
The central issue is that you are a stupid bootlicking fool, who has a horrible case of Stockholm syndrome...The State is not your friend, idjit.

But you are today's proud awardee...

StockPP.webp
 
We drug kids for being hyper(being normal).
We have drugs for depression.
We have drugs for OCD.
We have drugs for stress.
We have drugs for schizophrenia.
We have drugs for bipplar.

The list goes on and on. But we dont treat people who think they are something they clearly are not or people who think unnatural behavior is okay?
this gerbil thinks that trannys [democrats] are insane and dangerous !
5XpCwabliSTmkshyA2MuI9EiepdGLRWQG6eM9lbUE_U.webp
 
Nice try but I didn't say that you don't have aright to go. I"m only suggesting that you choose not to go if they offend you so.
No. Everyone has a right to stare at the perverts on parade and after living in the Bay Area for decades I know full well
what parts of the gay community are features of such parades...the most flamboyant and most anxious to shock the straights.
What I'm saying is traffic is shut down, entire blocks are cordoned off, everything comes to a halt when these parades are given permission to take over a good bit of a city like San Francisco. And people who aren't fans of those flaunting their deviancy (with all due respect, that's who the parades are for...the deviants within the gay community) you are forced to leave town or simply become a shut in for that day.

It's easy not to enter a gay bar. Not so easy to avoid a gay parade. It's a tiny minority bullying
a much larger population.
 
Last edited:
15th post
I've tried to school you on you bullshit before but apparently you are unable to benefit from education. Once again, the issue of right vs. privilege is irrelevant as is the issue of state licenses . They are red herring fallacies to distract from the real issue which is equality vs. discrimination. The fact is that heterosexuals were able to take for granted the right ( or privilege or whatever the **** you want to call it) while gays could not. Yes it is that simple.
You can't school me on jack shit, poofboi....I've studied statutory marriage, along with a lot of other sneaky shit The State does to con you into making them a "partner" in your private affairs, for decades.

You're a fool's fool...So willingly ignorant that you don't even know that you don't know.
You're still avoiding the central issue because you don't have an answer to it. You throw as much dung at the wall as you can to see what sticks. No matter what you know or think you know about marriage it does not change the fact that gays had been denied equal protection under the law and due process, and the states could not come up with a compelling state interest or even a rational basis for doing so
The central issue is that you are a stupid bootlicking fool, who has a horrible case of Stockholm syndrome...The State is not your friend, idjit.

But you are today's proud awardee...

View attachment 247417

Thank you.....for admitting that you cannot deal with the issue


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I've tried to school you on you bullshit before but apparently you are unable to benefit from education. Once again, the issue of right vs. privilege is irrelevant as is the issue of state licenses . They are red herring fallacies to distract from the real issue which is equality vs. discrimination. The fact is that heterosexuals were able to take for granted the right ( or privilege or whatever the **** you want to call it) while gays could not. Yes it is that simple.
You can't school me on jack shit, poofboi....I've studied statutory marriage, along with a lot of other sneaky shit The State does to con you into making them a "partner" in your private affairs, for decades.

You're a fool's fool...So willingly ignorant that you don't even know that you don't know.
You're still avoiding the central issue because you don't have an answer to it. You throw as much dung at the wall as you can to see what sticks. No matter what you know or think you know about marriage it does not change the fact that gays had been denied equal protection under the law and due process, and the states could not come up with a compelling state interest or even a rational basis for doing so
The central issue is that you are a stupid bootlicking fool, who has a horrible case of Stockholm syndrome...The State is not your friend, idjit.

But you are today's proud awardee...

View attachment 247417
Straw man fallacy! I never took a position on the issue of whether or not gov. should issue licenses. My argument has been that if they issue to to hetero couples they must issue them to gay couples. Plain and simple but apparently lost on you.
 
Straw man fallacy! I never took a position on the issue of whether or not gov. should issue licenses. My argument has been that if they issue to to hetero couples they must issue them to gay couples. Plain and simple but apparently lost on you.
Then you've already sold your soul in the first place...Sucks to be you.
 
Straw man fallacy! I never took a position on the issue of whether or not gov. should issue licenses. My argument has been that if they issue to to hetero couples they must issue them to gay couples. Plain and simple but apparently lost on you.
Then you've already sold your soul in the first place...Sucks to be you.
Really ? Sucks to be me? :abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg:

YOU think that supporting equality means selling your soul to the devil. ? How ******* ridiculous! I much rather be me :ahole-1:
 
Back
Top Bottom