Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We didn’t see and hear the evidence or voter fraud because it didn’t exist. No one was blocked.how is wanting the congress and the american people to see and hear the evidence of vote fraud and insurrection? ff there is nothing there to see, then Trump would look foolish, why block the evidence from being presented? WE have the right to know if our votes were compromised, don"t we? And if the evidence confirmed Biden's win it would be over forever. blocking it has kept this shit going.
I see that logic is not your forte. Even if there was "a mountain of evidence for Trump's crimes," that does NOT preclude a political motivation for prosecuting them, especially during a political campaign. Comprende?#2 proves you are demonstrably ignorant, and/or dishonest and there is no need to respond to the rest of your posts. You see, you'd have a point IF there wasn't a mountain of evidence for Trump's crimes.
I see that looking at the bigger picture is not your forte.I see that logic is not your forte.
These facts:Even if there was "a mountain of evidence for Trump's crimes," that does NOT preclude a political motivation for prosecuting them, especially during a political campaign. Comprende?
if this country is dumb enough to put Harris in the whitehouse, then the USA as a free democratic republic is over, done, history, fini. it amazes me that there is so much ignorance in this population, you are clearly a representative of that ignorance.Yeah, right.
View attachment 995015
What crimes did the NY kangaroo court find him guilty of? give us the statutes federal or state or STFU and stop lying.I see that looking at the bigger picture is not your forte.
These facts:
1. That the DOJ has prosecuted democrats, such as Cuellar, Menendez, Blagojevich.
2. That the DOJ has defended Trump twice in the courts.
3. The DOJ has prosecuted Biden's own son.
4. That there is a mountain of evidence for Trump's crimes.
...suggests that there is no political motivation, that committing crimes and prosecuting criminals is the motivation.
Now, on the state level, if you want to claim Bragg and Willis are politically motivated, just know that as long as they have tons of evidence, and they leave the conviction to a jury, then I really don't care. Putting criminals in jail is the DA's and the DOJ's job.
If there wasn't evidence, or the evidence was scant, such as the evidence the Comer committee had on Joe Biden, then you'd have a point that was worth noting or complaining about.
Now tell me that Comer wasn't politically motivated.
3. If you answer YES, please explain if you think that this fact does not constitute the greatest existing threat to American democracy.
Logic is not a big screen TV.I see that looking at the bigger picture is not your forte.
Your question:1. Do you believe President Trump's prosecutions were politically motivated? This is a YES or NO question. If you post on this thread without answering this question, you should be permanently IGNORED by all honest members of this board.
2. If you answer NO, you are demonstrably ignorant and/or dishonest and do not deserve a REPLY to your posts.
3. If you answer YES, please explain if you think that this fact does not constitute the greatest existing threat to American democracy.
My answer: YES. The declared aims of those prosecuting President Trump were to prevent him from running for or being reelected President of the United States. Taking such actions against a political opponent, especially during an election campaign, is the hallmark of an undemocratic "banana republic." I believe that this fact ALONE makes it imperative that President Trump be reelected.
Your question:
Do You Believe President Trump's Prosecutions were Politically Motivated?
My answer:
Is the Pope Catholic?
Do bears ___** in the woods?
Do birds fly?
Do fish swim?
And if they are successful in using that plus other dirty tricks to win the White House and especially if they also win the Senate in November, I am pretty sure America as we know it and as it was intended to be is done.
Clearly you are ignorant of the case, have done little research on it.What crimes did the NY kangaroo court find him guilty of? give us the statutes federal or state or STFU and stop lying.
ok wizard, give us a list ot the statutes he was guilty of violating. Running as a republican is not illegal. I have studied the case and the court documents; it was a kangaroo court and its rulings will be overturned on appeal.Clearly you are ignorant of the case, have done little research on it.
That is probably the most ignorant rationale you could have used to avoid answering that question.If they were 'politically motivated', you'd have to show that the DOJ only went after republicans.
Since that is false, your premise is false.
You are guilty of cherry picking, but it's understandable since Trump sucks up all the oxygen in the room.
NO1. Do you believe President Trump's prosecutions were politically motivated? This is a YES or NO question. If you post on this thread without answering this question, you should be permanently IGNORED by all honest members of this board.
2. If you answer NO, you are demonstrably ignorant and/or dishonest and do not deserve a REPLY to your posts.
3. If you answer YES, please explain if you think that this fact does not constitute the greatest existing threat to American democracy.
My answer: YES. The declared aims of those prosecuting President Trump were to prevent him from running for or being reelected President of the United States. Taking such actions against a political opponent, especially during an election campaign, is the hallmark of an undemocratic "banana republic." I believe that this fact ALONE makes it imperative that President Trump be reelected.
Are you crying right now? Are you okay?
![]()