Do you agree with Thomas?

Do you agree with Thomas's analysis and suggestions?

  • 100%

    Votes: 4 44.4%
  • Partially

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Not at all.

    Votes: 4 44.4%

  • Total voters
    9
You're a retard. STFU with your retardation. TIA! :D
Why did no Taliban attack American troops until after May 1st?
And really not even after that..
Yeah, you don't know or would lie about it if you did. STFU, Jane, you ignorant slut.
I do know, and know how many falsehoods were in this post I just quoted from you.
A LOT. 😐
It is the female version of JoeB. All it knows is that it hates.
 
Bub...this is the score.

Toppling Iran has little to do with nukes and everything to do with the USA / Jews controlling the Middle East. See the 'hit list' below.

Jews / America want regime change in Iran. Their goal is to topple the existing gov in Iran and install the Shaw of Iran's son in Iran. The Shaw of Iran's son is living in Virginia and ready to take control of Iran. Once accomplished, Iran as a proxy of the USA can shut off the oil to China. The USA can then use Iran for staging grounds to attack Russia, break it up and then move on to China.

Israel has 40% of Saudi Arabia in their sights for land take over. I'm surprised the Arabs are on the Jew's side. Israel also wants part of Egypt. It is all in their 'Greater Israel' expansion plans.

Google:

Greater Israel: an Ongoing Expansion Plan for the Middle East and North Africa – MEPEI

These countries are on Israel's hit list. The countries with an 'x' have been destabilized enough by the West to be considered a non-threat to Israel and neutered. The ones without an 'x' are still in progress.

Iran

Saudi Arabia

Somalia x

Lebanon x

Iraq x

Libya x

Syria x

Pakistan


View attachment 1125918
So, do you consider yourself a neo-Nazi or a Democrat?
 
1. Saudi Arabia seeks regime change in Iran.
2. US/Israel, EU, Arab neighbors seek (not always admmitedly in public) disarmed nuclear-Iran, especially Israel which has been threatened with annihilation by Islamic fascist Republic.
3. Phony-anti-war pro-war Tucker Carlson prefers nuclear Iran, emboldening head of terror snake.
4. All of the above does not mean there is a need (now) for '[boots] on the ground,' in today's drone age.
5. The vast contrast of Islamic Republic (just like Arab "Palestinian" regimes) targeting civilians VS Israeli warning for civilians to evacuate while operating against hostile targets, is as clear as ever.
6. A side note, the wild Islamic Republic has also aimed at a city in the Dan area whose most citizens refuse to serve in IDF, as most are ultra-orthodox.

Thomas. From West Coast, USA.

link




The Neocons Wanted To Split MAGA

By Tom Woods

June 19, 2025

Back in late 2007, when the American intelligence community generated a report definitively showing there was no Iran nuclear program, even the hawkish dolt George W. Bush backed off. Oh, he wanted to invade, all right, as he said privately, but how could he when the official rationale had gone missing?



Now we’re going to reject the findings of our own director of national intelligence in favor of the assurances of a foreign leader who has done nothing but goad Americans into expensive and ridiculous wars on the basis of saccharine promises that — wouldn’t you know it — never come true.

 
Last edited:
Only GOP and MAGA and Alt Right can be a neo-Nazi.
Benito Mussolini

Mussolini was originally a socialist politician
and journalist at the Avanti! newspaper. In 1912, he became a member of the National Directorate of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI), but was expelled for advocating military intervention in World War I. Italian politician and journalist who, upon assuming office as Prime Minister, became the dictator of Fascist Italy from the March on Rome in 1922 until his overthrow in 1943

 
If you oppose putting boots on the ground, you can easily attempt to demoralize your enemy through superior air power. Israel has done that.

And then what??? You can't just go in and bomb the shit out of the place, murder the government officials, and without some idea of what you're going to do when it's over. That's what you did in Iraq, and how did that work out for you?

After Bush declared "Mission Accomplished", he disbanded Saddam's Palace Guard and let them keep their weapons which gave rise to ISIS in 2005. The puppet government he installed was very weak, and resistance to US occupation hardened, as the Americans brought in foreign contractors to do the work of rebuilding the nation, while the Iraqi people were broke, hungry and unemployed.

They had a plan to win the war, but they lost the peace, because they had no plan for what came after.
 
Regarding #4, in a war, you can control the air, but to actually conquer a nation, boots on the ground are necessary unless the majority of the nation's population sides with you.
The U.S. had the technological edge and controlled the air in Afghanistan, but we were still driven out by a bunch of determined, hardened fighters armed with RPKs, PKMs, AK-47s, AK-74s, Dragunov Sniper Rifles, RPGs and IEDs. Guerilla tactics wear down conventional forces with the constant loss of life and their enemy's willpower. Sun Tzu's Art of War written in the 5th century is still a great tool to learn tactics.
We do not need nor do we plan to conquer Iran. What we need to do is ensure that the Islamic terrorists never acquire a nuclear weapon, which means we need to destroy their facilities.
 
And then what??? You can't just go in and bomb the shit out of the place, murder the government officials, and without some idea of what you're going to do when it's over. That's what you did in Iraq, and how did that work out for you?

After Bush declared "Mission Accomplished", he disbanded Saddam's Palace Guard and let them keep their weapons which gave rise to ISIS in 2005. The puppet government he installed was very weak, and resistance to US occupation hardened, as the Americans brought in foreign contractors to do the work of rebuilding the nation, while the Iraqi people were broke, hungry and unemployed.

They had a plan to win the war, but they lost the peace, because they had no plan for what came after.
I'm going to say this as nicely as I can, Dragonlady:

I will take more stock in your verbose, emotional opinions when you are a more active and involved participant in our politics.

But until then, whatever you think of American foreign policy or military decisions is wholly irrelevant.

Even still, the only plan is to drop a quintet of GBU-57/MOPs on Fordow and go home, if Trump does indeed decide to do so. Israel has planted the nail; America will drive it home. That's all it would take.
 
1. Saudi Arabia seeks regime change in Iran.
2. US/Israel, EU, Arab neighbors seek (not always admmitedly in public) disarmed nuclear-Iran, especially Israel which has been threatened with annihilation by Islamic fascist Republic.
3. Phony-anti-war pro-war Tucker Carlson prefers nuclear Iran, emboldening head of terror snake.
4. All of the above does not mean there is a need (now) for '[boots] on the ground,' in today's drone age.
5. The vast contrast of Islamic Republic (just like Arab "Palestinian" regimes) targeting civilians VS Israeli warning for civilians to evacuate while operating against hostile targets, is as clear as ever.
6. A side note, the wild Islamic Republic has also aimed at a city in the Dan area whose most citizens refuse to serve in IDF, as most are ultra-orthodox.

Thomas. From West Coast, USA.

link
So Thomas is a good solid maybe?
 
And then what??? You can't just go in and bomb the shit out of the place, murder the government officials, and without some idea of what you're going to do when it's over. That's what you did in Iraq, and how did that work out for you?

After Bush declared "Mission Accomplished", he disbanded Saddam's Palace Guard and let them keep their weapons which gave rise to ISIS in 2005. The puppet government he installed was very weak, and resistance to US occupation hardened, as the Americans brought in foreign contractors to do the work of rebuilding the nation, while the Iraqi people were broke, hungry and unemployed.

They had a plan to win the war, but they lost the peace, because they had no plan for what came after.
Alrighty, so the Democrat plan is what? Do nothing?
 
It is very disingenuous for the anti-Israel crowd to reduce this to a matter of two waring governments that America needs to stay out of. Aside from the fact that there is no moral equivalence (Israel targets military sites while the Islamic terrorists aim for major civilian locations), NO decent, normal country - including those in the Middle East - wants the State Sponsor of Terrorism to get its hands on a nuclear weapon.

The world owes a big debt of gratitude to Israel, but instead it will take the blame for ridding the world of a major nuclear threat, because….well, antisemites like to blame Da Joos.
 
You're a retard. STFU with your retardation. TIA! :D
Why did no Taliban attack American troops until after May 1st?
And really not even after that..
Yeah, you don't know or would lie about it if you did. STFU, Jane, you ignorant slut.
I do know, and know how many falsehoods were in this post I just quoted from you.
A LOT. 😐

Why - because Trump surrendered to Taliban and got US troops out of the Country. But Trump didn't get American citizens out. He didn't get military staffers and their families out. He didn't get guides translators and others who worked for your government and were considered "traitors to Afghanistan" out of the country. He just loaded the troops onto planes and left, the Afghan government troops, just put down their weapons and quit, and the Taliban rolled into Kabul in the weeks that followed.

When Biden took office, there was no plan to get anyone else out. Biden had to send 1000 troops back into Afghanistan and succeeded in getting 150,000 American and Afghan families out of the country before the end. Yes it was chaotic and difficult but compared to Viet Nam, it was a remarkable achievement.
 
It is very disingenuous for the anti-Israel crowd to reduce this to a matter of two waring governments that America needs to stay out of. Aside from the fact that there is no moral equivalence (Israel targets military sites while the Islamic terrorists aim for major civilian locations), NO decent, normal country - including those in the Middle East - wants the State Sponsor of Terrorism to get its hands on a nuclear weapon.

The world owes a big debt of gratitude to Israel, but instead it will take the blame for ridding the world of a major nuclear threat, because….well, antisemites like to blame Da Joos.

Iran wouldn't have been in position to have a nuclear weapon if Trump hadn't torn up the treaty he now wants Iran to sign. That Agreement didn't expire until this year, so they wouldn't have been free to start enriching uranium 7 years ago. They were in compliance with the Agreement at the time Trump pulled out.
 
Iran wouldn't have been in position to have a nuclear weapon if Trump hadn't torn up the treaty he now wants Iran to sign. That Agreement didn't expire until this year, so they wouldn't have been free to start enriching uranium 7 years ago. They were in compliance with the Agreement at the time Trump pulled out.
They never complied with that thing. Stop lying.
So why didn't "Biden" start it back up, dumbass?
Yeah. :eek2yum:
Biden and Obammer just gave them billions of dollars and made their oil more valuable, what could go wrong? :rolleyes-41:
 
Last edited:
They never complied with that thing. Stop lying.
So why didn't "Biden" start it back up, dumbass?
Yeah. :eek2yum:

Once a treaty is broken, it's over. You have to start over. By the time Biden took office, China, Russia, and Iran weren't even interested in going back to the table.
 
15th post
We do not need nor do we plan to conquer Iran. What we need to do is ensure that the Islamic terrorists never acquire a nuclear weapon, which means we need to destroy their facilities.
What Iran needs is to throw out the radical Islamic regime and most of the Iranians are in favor of it but lacked the weaponry to take their nation back. Many are out in the streets of Iran now, calling for the death of Khamenei and cheering at what's happening to the regime.
 
Simplistic yes or no answers to complicated issues. Typical these days. Who the hell is Thomas anyway?
 
What Iran needs is to throw out the radical Islamic regime and most of the Iranians are in favor of it but lacked the weaponry to take their nation back. Many are out in the streets of Iran now, calling for the death of Khamenei and cheering at what's happening to the regime.
When Khamenei is disposed, it will be like the monkeys applauding that the witch is dead.
 
Back
Top Bottom