Do Jews Control the Media?

[holston]

Let's hear what the Jews have to say about it:

Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies and the "American Dream"

 

[holston]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpfMW-rVBsQ#t=48]Hollywood An Empire Of Their Own (3 of 3) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[holston]

Bob Andrews: Hollywood, a glimpse behind the facade

"The moguls are gone but their vision survives. The America of Edison and Rankin has given way to an alien ideology. It isn't the communism or Judaism that the gentile élite once feared; it's Americanism as defined by the new global religion: Hollywoodism!"

Those who have taken the time to watch (and listen) to the previous three film clips can hear the Jews themselves boast of their triumph in the conquest of the US.

Nazis?

You decide.

 

[holston]

 

[Pennywise]

Is the Pope Catholic?

P.S. Why is this in the conspiracy section? It's reality and should be in the media section.

 

[holston]

The Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion | My Journey

In the field of politic, media plays an important role in shaping public’s opinion according to the agenda of the political elites. Through the article The US Media, Huntington and September 11, Ervand Abrahamian argues that The US media used the Huntington paradigm in explaining the motives behind September 11 to make the public avoid discussing political issues which is unfavorable for the government.

The major media such as The New York Times denied any political motive behind the September 11 attack and turned to cultural reasons instead. It argued that the attack had nothing to do with politics but the cultural issues like secularism and women’s freedom in US that made a group of people from Muslim countries hated them. Another major media such as The Wall Street Journal also pointed at cultural hatred such as war against democracy and freedom as the motive behind the attack. In short, daily papers in the United States supposed to deal with current news escaped into the realms of history, theology, anthropology, and even cultural studies.

When bin Laden told Al-Jazeera that the cause of the attack was American involvement in the Middle East conflict, the American government side asked the media not to expose it to public. It was clear that the media was diverted because the American government did not want to be blamed for the cause of the September 11 tragedy.

The role of media in shaping public’s opinion in the political field is also shown through the photographs around the U.S. war on terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan. In an article titled Remapping the Visual War on Terrorism, Wedy Kozol and Rebecca Decola argue that those photographs do not only function to document the event, but beyond that they also serve to lead the viewers toward a certain political tendency.

The analysis from the entertainment and news media show that there is power dominance in the society that influences the ideology presented by the media.

News and images are often designed in order to gain public’s support for their policy. At the end, the analysis shows that the media plays a great role in shaping public’s opinion to go along with the interests of the ruling class in the society.

 

[holston]

Hollywood Influences Public Opinion On Health Issues - Kansas City infoZine

"Fictional TV shows reach a much wider audience than most news programs, and in many ways they can be even more powerful," said Vicky Rideout, a vice president of the foundation. "Instead of bill numbers and budget figures, health policy issues are portrayed through the lives of characters the viewer cares about, often in life or death situations."

The study analyzed content from every hospital-based TV drama on the air during the 2000 to 2001 season. Shows evaluated included "ER," "City of Angels," "Gideon's Crossing" and "Strong Medicine."

And, with shows such as "ER" attracting 20-to-30 million viewers each week, the study found entertainment TV can be more powerful than news in shaping the public's opinion on issues.

"There is a lot of policy discussion in the programs - on average, one or two times per show," said Joseph Turrow, the study's author. "The predominant kind of discussion is not cost related but ethics. A real attempt in the programs is made to deal with the complexity of the issues."

Turrow said entertainment media hold a substantial amount of power in influencing people's opinion, but the danger comes in misusing it. During a panel discussion Tuesday, some argued that misusing this power can portray reality inaccurately.

Of the issues raised in the shows, most were not discussed in great depth. More than 65 percent of health policy topics were dispatched in just one scene.

"I think the problem is we can't be too dry or boring," said James Kearns, "John Q" screenwriter. "We have to tell stories in an emotional way. The public needs to understand that we have to tell stories of conflict and dimension, and that we may not portray it (in the most educational])way."

In addition, the study found virtually no discussion of issues such as long-term care, the uninsured, prescription drug coverage and non-HMO insurance issues.

"We know Hollywood has the power to produce visual images in a memorable and enduring way," said Dianne Rowland, the Kaiser Family Foundation's executive vice president. "It is the faces and stories that really do connect with our legislators and lawmakers, and that is why the entertainment media are so important."

 

[holston]

SGN - Seattle Gay News - Page 5 - Hollywood shapes public opinion - Friday, January 9, 2009 - Volume 37 Issue 02

Hollywood shapes public opinion
by Gerald Libonati - Special to the SGN

Was the road to Barack Obama's presidency paved by Hollywood's entertainment machine? The movie and television industry may have had a hand in shaping public opinion about electing a black president by depicting African-Americans in the role of America's number-one guy. Seeing situations on screen allows viewers to get used to a new idea.

If Hollywood could change the way Americans think about having a black president, could it also influence the way Americans look at Gay and Lesbian people? It already has.

The younger you are, the less you will be aware that movies and TV shows have dramatically changed. They've evolved over the years to include Gay and Lesbian characters. It wasn't always like that. For most of the 20th century, there were virtually no Gay/Lesbian personalities on the big or the small screen.

A smattering of Gay characters now populate mainstream shows, not as devious villains, but as ordinary people. The horns are still being removed from Gay and Lesbian heads, but, who knows, when the process is done, maybe we'll even see a Gay or Lesbian president.

 

[holston]

Hollywood?s ?Gay Culture? Reshaping America | Daily News | NCRegister.com

Hollywood’s ‘Gay Culture’ Reshaping America (6765)
Almost 20% of Americans say TV has shifted their opinion in favor of the redefinition of marriage.

by PETER JESSERER SMITH 05/16/2013

LOS ANGELES — The entertainment industry centered on Hollywood has helped reshape Americans’ views on sexuality, family and marriage.

But this change results from Hollywood’s powerful homosexual culture, whose ideological leaders tolerate no dissent — even from other homosexuals — and who have filled a vacuum in the industry left by the absence of faithful Christians.

GLAAD (formerly Gays and Lesbians in Alliance Against Defamation) is one of the movers and shakers focused on using the power of Hollywood to shape public opinion in favor of normalizing homosexual behavior and redefining marriage to include same-sex couples.

More than 5,000 members of the rich and famous attended the Los Angeles GLAAD Media Awards in April, which honored President Bill Clinton with the Advocate for Change Award. Clinton has apologized for signing into federal law the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which now faces a constitutional challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court.

However, GLAAD has made known that not all homosexuals in Hollywood are welcome, especially when they step out of line with GLAAD’s agenda. Bret Easton Ellis, screenwriter and author of the book American Psycho, took to Twitter to claim that GLAAD had banned him from the awards ceremony over controversial tweets criticizing what he called the “politically correct gay agenda.”

 

[holston]

Jewish Control of Gay Rights

Jewish Control of Gay Rights

Gay rights are a good thing, as they are needed, but what isn't good is what the Jews have been doing with them. What passes for "gay rights" today, has nothing to do with actual rights for gays/bi's. The Jews are pushing a PERVERTED version that doesn't resemble true gay rights at all.

Right now, the Jews are doing some serious baiting, in hopes to cause as big of a backlash as possible. Jewish "sex education teachers" with last names such as Katz and Abels, are teaching young children dangerous sex acts, such as how to insert a hand and wrist into someone's anus. They are also telling the children that it is a "privilege" to be sexually molested by an adult.

The so-called "left wing" is completely owned by Jews who pretend to be "liberal" and all for "free thought," etc. Do not let the Jews fool you!! In *all* past and present Jewish political regimes, gays were, and are, segregated, persecuted, tortured, and killed. Josef Stalin's real last name was "Dugashvilli" which means "son of a Jew" in Georgian. Stalin's regime was one such example of hatred and massacre towards gay people. While Stalin was having homosexuals rounded up by the thousands and sent to REAL death camps (all run by Jews), his troops were sent to America to teach that homosexuality meant "free love."

This is how the Jews handle things with gays. They use them as Marxist foot soldiers and then throw them away, when they've outlived their use.

 

[holston]

http://http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=830

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJqI9bv0C7I&list=PL286EBD0376F2B097]Inglouriousouser Bastards - Inglourious Basterds spoof - YouTube[/ame]

 

[SAYIT]

The Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion | My Journey

In the field of politic, media plays an important role in shaping public’s opinion according to the agenda of the political elites. Through the article The US Media, Huntington and September 11, Ervand Abrahamian argues that The US media used the Huntington paradigm in explaining the motives behind September 11 to make the public avoid discussing political issues which is unfavorable for the government.

The major media such as The New York Times denied any political motive behind the September 11 attack and turned to cultural reasons instead. It argued that the attack had nothing to do with politics but the cultural issues like secularism and women’s freedom in US that made a group of people from Muslim countries hated them. Another major media such as The Wall Street Journal also pointed at cultural hatred such as war against democracy and freedom as the motive behind the attack. In short, daily papers in the United States supposed to deal with current news escaped into the realms of history, theology, anthropology, and even cultural studies.

Quote:
When bin Laden told Al-Jazeera that the cause of the attack was American involvement in the Middle East conflict, the American government side asked the media not to expose it to public. It was clear that the media was diverted because the American government did not want to be blamed for the cause of the September 11 tragedy.

The analysis from the entertainment and news media show that there is power dominance in the society that influences the ideology presented by the media.

News and images are often designed in order to gain public’s support for their policy. At the end, the analysis shows that the media plays a great role in shaping public’s opinion to go along with the interests of the ruling class in the society.

Any idea who the author of that WORDPRESS blog was and what evidence he has that the US gov't asked US media outlets not to expose OBL's claim that the Mideast conflict was the reason for the 9/11 attack?

 

[SAYIT]

Jewish Control of Gay Rights

Jewish Control of Gay Rights

Gay rights are a good thing, as they are needed, but what isn't good is what the Jews have been doing with them. What passes for "gay rights" today, has nothing to do with actual rights for gays/bi's. The Jews are pushing a PERVERTED version that doesn't resemble true gay rights at all.

Right now, the Jews are doing some serious baiting, in hopes to cause as big of a backlash as possible. Jewish "sex education teachers" with last names such as Katz and Abels, are teaching young children dangerous sex acts, such as how to insert a hand and wrist into someone's anus. They are also telling the children that it is a "privilege" to be sexually molested by an adult.

The so-called "left wing" is completely owned by Jews who pretend to be "liberal" and all for "free thought," etc. Do not let the Jews fool you!! In *all* past and present Jewish political regimes, gays were, and are, segregated, persecuted, tortured, and killed. Josef Stalin's real last name was "Dugashvilli" which means "son of a Jew" in Georgian. Stalin's regime was one such example of hatred and massacre towards gay people. While Stalin was having homosexuals rounded up by the thousands and sent to REAL death camps (all run by Jews), his troops were sent to America to teach that homosexuality meant "free love."

This is how the Jews handle things with gays. They use them as Marxist foot soldiers and then throw them away, when they've outlived their use.

Any idea who the author of that was?

 

[holston]

Jewish Control of Gay Rights

Jewish Control of Gay Rights

Any idea who the author of that was?

Your implication is clear; the author has no credibility...........but YOU do, of course.

The thread is about whether the Jews control the media, which they clearly DO.
The corollary to that is the INFLUENCE that near total control of the media has on the general population.

So the question is not primarily centered on the "Gay movement" or the homosexual agenda. The relative importance of this single issue is debatable.
One thing it is NOT, is a question about whether "gays" are contemptible people that deserve to be ostracized or mistreated by the rest of society.

LIKEWISE, the question of Jewish control of the media is NOT one of whether "Jews" are innately bad people who should be mistreated, consigned to concentration camps, or gassed to death at the first opportunity, despite the repeated and incessant efforts of the proponents of Zionisms efforts to always frame the debate in those terms!


UN-ORTHODOX JEW: The Real Gay Agenda - Destroy The Family Structure

You see, this debate is really not about “equal rights,” as the proponents of homosexual behavior like to frame it, but about redefining marriage, family, and, yes, American culture. And such things don’t happen over night (they’re not designed to).

Nonetheless, if allowed to proceed, like the proverbial frog in the pot, we may well wake up one day in the not-too-distant future to find that marriage and family have lost all present meaning.

If that sounds extreme, consider this comment by activist Michaelangelo Signorile, who ardently promotes homosexual behavior:

[You should] fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits, and then, once granted, redefine the definition of marriage entirely. The most subversive action lesbians and gay men can undertake is to transform the definition of “family” entirely.

This is no idle or isolated threat, but a definitive statement of their strategy. In Sweden, the Feminist Initiative, a new political party, has already essentially called for the abolition of marriage as the next step of “progress” in their nation, promoting instead “a cohabitation law that ignores gender and allows more than two people in a partnership.”

You may question the right of the above blogger to voice his concerns about the underlying purpose of the homosexual agenda also.
But you can't really question whether the media has any influence in shaping and conditioning public opinion on the matter unless you believe that the majority of people in the country who get their news and information from it possess the faculty to think independently and reach conclusions based on facts, when all the facts are seldom presented to them without bias.

To do so would assume that only the people you deem lacking in critical thinking skills would be adversely affected by non-stop propaganda. Only those people with whom you disagree would seem to be on your list of those who should be denounced as lacking credibility. That include mostly those like myself who, rather than accepting everything the Jewish media promote automatically, mostly reject it.

Paradoxically, that would make those of us who treat the media fare with the most skepticism as being the most stupid of all (according to you), despite every indication that we are the least gullible and the least pliable.



I find it interesting that it is a self professed Jew who is calling attention to the "boiling frog" analogy to describe the incremental methodology of media.

Another way of putting it is "Give them an inch and they'll take a mile." and/or "Give them a little rope and they'll hang you with it."


Unfortunately the problems that sissies are forced to endure anyway is compounded by the polarizing effect of the way this "cause" is packaged and presented by the media as part of the campaign to further fracture society into opposing camps. They would have you think that each case is identical and therefore can be reduced to one of whether one great "lump" of people should be totally isolated or that every conceivable deviance should be embraced along with the perversions of a few.

It's unfortunate for the community of Momma's boys that they should be forced to suffer the fall out from the Marxist social program. If those kinds of warped and maltreated souls should not have difficulty enough finding happiness through a VIABLE union with a mate as nature would have it, the Jewish community seems intent on guaranteeing it that they never should! Otherwise why should they campaign so hard towards assuring those ends?

It makes one wonder whether they really have the best interests of those misshaped individuals in mind in the first place, OR whether the push for creating more gentile castrados is part of a more extensive plan.

But make no mistake: the goals of those who would impose same-sex “marriage” on this country are nothing short of subversive, and they don’t care if the sky does fall. In order to validate their sexual choices, activists in support of homosexual behavior will stop at nothing—even if it means destroying marriage, redefining the family (so that it can mean virtually anything), outlawing all opposition as “hate speech,” and undermining our precious heritage of government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

 

[holston]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSKAS-YVCns]Revolutionary Jews Promote Porn, Feminism & Homo Agenda E Michael Jones - YouTube[/ame]

 

[holston]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djMjKaK5xQ0]Texe Marrs on Hollywood and Jews and Obama - YouTube[/ame]

 

[SAYIT]

Jewish Control of Gay Rights


Any idea who the author of that was?

Your implication is clear; the author has no credibility...........but YOU do, of course.

The thread is about whether the Jews control the media, which they clearly DO.
The corollary to that is the INFLUENCE that near total control of the media has on the general population.

So the question is not primarily centered on the "Gay movement" or the homosexual agenda. The relative importance of this single issue is debatable.
One thing it is NOT, is a question about whether "gays" are contemptible people that deserve to be ostracized or mistreated by the rest of society.

LIKEWISE, the question of Jewish control of the media is NOT one of whether "Jews" are innately bad people who should be mistreated, consigned to concentration camps, or gassed to death at the first opportunity, despite the repeated and incessant efforts of the proponents of Zionisms efforts to always frame the debate in those terms!


UN-ORTHODOX JEW: The Real Gay Agenda - Destroy The Family Structure


You may question the right of the above blogger to voice his concerns about the underlying purpose of the homosexual agenda also.
But you can't really question whether the media has any influence in shaping and conditioning public opinion on the matter unless you believe that the majority of people in the country who get their news and information from it possess the faculty to think independently and reach conclusions based on facts, when all the facts are seldom presented to them without bias.

To do so would assume that only the people you deem lacking in critical thinking skills would be adversely affected by non-stop propaganda. Only those people with whom you disagree would seem to be on your list of those who should be denounced as lacking credibility. That include mostly those like myself who, rather than accepting everything the Jewish media promote automatically, mostly reject it.

Paradoxically, that would make those of us who treat the media fare with the most skepticism as being the most stupid of all (according to you), despite every indication that we are the least gullible and the least pliable.



I find it interesting that it is a self professed Jew who is calling attention to the "boiling frog" analogy to describe the incremental methodology of media.

Another way of putting it is "Give them an inch and they'll take a mile." and/or "Give them a little rope and they'll hang you with it."


Unfortunately the problems that sissies are forced to endure anyway is compounded by the polarizing effect of the way this "cause" is packaged and presented by the media as part of the campaign to further fracture society into opposing camps. They would have you think that each case is identical and therefore can be reduced to one of whether one great "lump" of people should be totally isolated or that every conceivable deviance should be embraced along with the perversions of a few.

It's unfortunate for the community of Momma's boys that they should be forced to suffer the fall out from the Marxist social program. If those kinds of warped and maltreated souls should not have difficulty enough finding happiness through a VIABLE union with a mate as nature would have it, the Jewish community seems intent on guaranteeing it that they never should! Otherwise why should they campaign so hard towards assuring those ends?

It makes one wonder whether they really have the best interests of those misshaped individuals in mind in the first place, OR whether the push for creating more gentile castrados is part of a more extensive plan.

But make no mistake: the goals of those who would impose same-sex “marriage” on this country are nothing short of subversive, and they don’t care if the sky does fall. In order to validate their sexual choices, activists in support of homosexual behavior will stop at nothing—even if it means destroying marriage, redefining the family (so that it can mean virtually anything), outlawing all opposition as “hate speech,” and undermining our precious heritage of government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

That's a whole lot of spittin' and pissin' but you never did reveal the author.

 

[holston]

That's a whole lot of spittin' and pissin' but you never did reveal the author.

Odd that you should say that, being that's about all you and your buds ever do.

Why can't you just admit the truth contained in the articles?

 

[SAYIT]

That's a whole lot of spittin' and pissin' but you never did reveal the author.

Odd that you should say that, being that's about all you and your buds ever do.

Why can't you just admit the truth contained in the articles?

So I'm supposed to accept your "truths" because you and some unknown blogger say they are?
You are a funny girl, Princess.