JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
Do Jews Control the Media?
No, it is the Rosicrucians
No, it is the Rosicrucians
Do Jews Control the Media?
- Thread starter holston
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #22
theliq
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #23
So true,but let's really get to the bones of the matter.....they also "own" the Finance Sector,Reserve Bank,a whole stack of Lobbyists,Hollywood of course,much Media and so much more.
These are the Material Facts of the Matter...........it's enough to make you SPIT and PISS.
Last edited:
Yeah! It's enough to make any goose-steppin' Nazi type spit and piss!
- Thread starter
- #25
The facts are there for anyone to see who has eyes and is willing to admit the truth to themselves.
So why do so few do so?
I would say that is mostly due to the Jewish control of the media.
The Jews enjoy a privileged status.
This is evidenced by the fact that they are per capita the highest income bracket.
(Wouldn't it be foolish of them to give it up?)
This relative success is made possible by the fact that Jews go largely unrecognized and are therefore able to work in tandem unbeknownst to rivals and competitors and thus they may DISCRIMINATE with impunity.
Showing favor towards ones own kind is something Jews have worked long and hard to prevent their gentile rivals from doing. This explains why when you hear so much about "racism", bigotry, and discrimination, it is always implied and assumed that is something that only "white" men are guilty of.
If this supposition were true, it would mean that other races and ethnic groups are incapable of such practices. It is reasonable to ask why only "white" (non-Jewish) MEN ever do so. Yet such a question is forbidden. Is it because to ask such a simple question might expose the fallacy of such reasoning and reveal that the supposition itself is based on a concept of intrinsic inequality?
In the cultural promotion of the ideal of "equality" this idea indicates that people are in fact NOT equal. Why? Because if ALL people were equal, then they would also ALL be equally prone to the foibles of "racism", bigotry and of the ability to "discriminate". According to mass media, they are not!
As things stand, it goes without saying that such social "sins" are ALWAYS something that "white MEN" commit. The one possible exception to this unspoken rule is the case wherein a black men is found to be guilty of offending some Jew.
One may discern a relatively recent trend towards being critical of prominent black "social activists" by the media talking heads.
For a "white" man to criticize black leaders thusly at an earlier time would have been unheard of. No doubt such venting would have brought on the kind of castigation which Imus endured over his "nappy headed Ho" quip.
One may conclude that an indictment of a black figure head must be met with the approval of the Jewish media bosses.
Otherwise they would all meet consequences similar to the demotion that Glen Beck had due to his inadvertent offense against certain Rabbis and the clumsy mistake he made of listing too many Jews among those he deemed subversive. Never mind that he never mentioned them by ethnicity.
It was enough in that instance that the Jews knew their identity and considered the call too close for comfort. The possibility that too many gentiles might make the connection loomed to large on such a grand venue.
It is a universal FACT that those who control the MONEY rule the roost.
Stereotypically, Jews have a reputation concerning the getting of money. There is no reason to believe that such stereotypes as they relate to Jews are any less applicable than the stereotypes which Jewish critics once assigned to the now defunct WASP "establishment". (Which has now been replaced by a Judaic one, by their own admission.)
Christian ethics have a tradition of teaching the preeminence of spiritual value over the pursuit of lucre. One may debate whether this is profitable and in what sense.
Judaism has no such qualms. In fact, the pursuit of wealth is imbued in the Jewish culture because having lots of money in the Jewish culture is considered synonymous with righteousness. The lack of it is universally seen among them as a sign of total failure, spiritual and otherwise.
Therefore Jews place the highest priority on obtaining wealth and status, whereas the Christian culture has a misdirected tradition built around "poverty, obedience, and chastity" which harken back to the time of the ascetics such as "Saint" Francis of Assisi.
It is also a truism that he who has the most money has first choice among women.
Only someone divorced from reality would say that this pursuit among men is of little importance. This is no less true among Jews than it is among blacks.
It may be observed that Jews will occasionally boast of certain achievements which provide them with advantages. ( What good is the having of a thing if you can't compare it anothers lack thereof?) A gentile who suggests that this state exists due to social inequities or unfairness will be accused of having anti-semitic motives. Jews citing nepotism or "tribalism" among whites is seen as "redressing a social wrong".
It should be obvious from all this that the Jewish cabal does not want to reveal their numbers or strengths for fear of alarming the gentile host who might then decide to act.
Their chutzbah of late reveals less and less concern over this prospect. Is this because they appreciate the ignorance prevalent among gentiles as to the nature of Judaism?
At the same time they must boast of their status somewhat in order to gain further prestige and all the perks that come with it. Everyone loves a winner. Conversely gentile men are portrayed in the media more often as losers, especially those who are politically incorrect. Could this be a form of social conditioning which would predispose observers to preset attitudes which could in turn affect their decisions?
WHY does the gentile community not respond to the inordinate amount of influence and control which Jews exert over them? WHY should a society which is so preoccupied with enforcing "equality" in employment and on every other front, relentlessly assail the white male gentile class as being those who deserve demotion, while simultaneously ignoring the inordinate amount of wealth which the Jewish class enjoy?
In the first case, white male advantage is attributed to the practice of "racism", bigotry, and discrimination, popularly called "the good ol' boy club". While in the case of the Jew, their successes are attributed to "hard work" and innate superior intelligence.
What proof is offered to support these popular notions? And if they are accepted, then does that not imply the SUPERIORITY of the Jewish culture and gene pool? Is this not a SUPREMACIST doctrine?
WHO makes these assertions and on what grounds?
As long as the Jews remain a minority, they may enjoy inordinate advantage without upsetting the status of the WASP elitists to any appreciable extent. The numbers of gentiles who must be marginalized in order to maintain this status quo are not sufficient to cause a groundswell of resentment.
The relation between the gentile "upper crust" and the Jewish Supremacists remains one of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours". How else do you explain the charades of "partisanism" within Congress when the results always show that there isn't a nickels worth of difference between them?
Last edited:
paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,163
- 1,130
Yes, they control a good portion of it. They certainly control most of Film & TV. I don't think that's disputable. Just look at who's currently running most of Hollywood and TV. The bigger question for me is, why are most Jews in America Communists? Most propaganda films released in Hollywood are Communist oriented. So when and why did most Jews in America decide to lean Communist? It's perplexing because most Jews around the World were not Communists. In fact, the Communists and Nazis in Europe slaughtered several Millions of them. So why do so many Jews in America lean Communist? It's an interesting question to ponder.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #27
I think it is more correct to say that Jewish led Bolsheviks slaughtered millions of their political opponents which is what led to their incarceration and subsequent deaths in German concentration camps. It should be noted that Hitler placed his opponents there regardless of their ethnicity.
It is also noteworthy that it was Marx, whose Father was an ordained Rabbi who is credited with the origin of communist doctrine. Since Jews like to take credit for so many things, they should not be denied credit for these other contributions to the world.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
I disagree with the author on at least one point here. Facts CAN be denied. Jews frequently deny them when they are placed in an unfavorable light.
Gentiles on the other hand , especially "whites" in the US and Germany above all, are forced to confess to their collective sins day and night forever and ever, world without end, with no provisions and few exceptions being made for individuals either. No attempts to qualify or rationalize any questionable actions taken in the name of "Western civilization" are permitted. No insinuations about actions attributable to the Jewish collective are allowed either. Historical revision is only open to those subjects in which questions of authorship or involving "to whom credit is due".
Those would be questions pertaining to who is chiefly responsible for the the scientific advancement and moral enlightenment of mankind. They may be assumed to have been usurped from discredited Jewish geniuses by evil "white" colonial imperialists and misogynistic , bigoted "white supremacists" who have never found anything better to do than exploit and oppress the colored peoples of the world, above all the "Jews". Such a task would only be suitable to the oppressed minority of them who constitute the best and brightest humanity has to offer, the Jews. After all the world rightly belongs to them since "G-d" said so. We have their word as proof!
We see in the case of the German people, ignorance was not an excuse. However, in light of the fact that the bloody Bolshevik revolution PRECEDED WWII one may almost be forgiven for doubting whether Hitler's intentions toward Russia were altogether sinister without reason, especially since there were so many Reds campaigning for a similar revolution within the boarders of Germany proper at the time; not to mention the German lands confiscated after WWI and Russia's obstinate refusal to allow a corridor to those lands which were still inhabited by former German citizens.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #28
National Socialist
Rookie
- Banned
- #30
Because ANYTHING that has to do with Jews running things,Pro white,etc things of that nature are automatically deleted or moved to rubber area...Take that how you want to...I have come to my own conclusions.
- Thread starter
- #31
Well as the Zionists COLLABORATED with the Nazis, YOU'D KNOW ALL ABOUT THAT,OF COURSE being a ZIONIST YOURSELF.
You try as hard as you can to deflect the truth,but as always with you,YOU are riddled with GUILT.
I've heard that claim before but I've never investigated it so I cannot say much about it.
What I can say though, is that if the "Nazis" collaborated with the "Zionists" at the time leading up to WWII, that would only serve to show that the "Nazis" really had no desire to exterminate the Jews to begin with, but only a desire to have them removed to a distant land where they could no longer muck around with the German economy and attempt to destroy the German culture and nation.
As far as that goes, I guess you could call me a Zionist if you want to and I would not object, so long as what you mean by that is that I desire to have the so called "Jews", their converts, their gentile spouses, and all their associated Marxist ideologues removed to a land beyond their power to dick around with the US as they did with Germany and as they are presently doing to the US.
If by "Zionist" you mean the definition which is indicative of all those who believe that the "Jews" are "Gds 'chosen' people" and therefore have the divine right to rule the world, then I must strenuously object on both counts.
Zionism - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
I cannot comport with a definition of Zionism to include the confiscation of other peoples lands whether by force of theft or some globalists decree. That would include the Balfour agreement. In that case it appears to me that someone (England) made an agreement to give to the "Jews" the land of Palestine which at the time was occupied by Palestinians.
Unless Great Britain owned Palestine, then I see no legitimate right of theirs to have "given" any rights to Palestine to begin with.
But I was under the impression that the agreement was originally made in such a way as to guarantee that the rights of the natives of Palestine at that time would in no way be infringed upon. Obviously that part of the bargain was not adhered to. So one can hardly blame people for being upset when they are being forcibly evicted from their homes.
The Jews in the US are always going on about how the "white man" evicted the American Indians from their homes just as they constantly remind us about the abuses of Negro slaves prior to the "Civil" War.
They always fail to mention the prominent role of Jewish merchants in the slave trade from it's inception in America.
What they fail to explain to us how the modern Jews can at once tell us how they are innocent of the "genocide" of the American Indians while they simultaneously argue that the US government was not founded upon Christian principles because, as they would have it, the Jews formed the Constitution based upon the "Noahide Laws".
Another way of asking it, is how could the Jews be around to found the constitution upon "Noahide Law", finance the American revolution, finance and fight the Union led "war to free the slaves", and yet not be around to participate in the wanton extermination of the Indians and the introduction of the slave trade into the north way in advance of the settlement of the South?
To listen to the Jewish historical revisionists of today, one could come away believing that not only did Jews found the country, they fought the war for Independence, freed the slaves, and were on the front lines against the terrible Nazis too!
How many times can one get the impression from TV and movies that Jews led the Normandy Invasion, the Battle of the Bulge, and won the west to boot? One has to wonder how such a great multitude of studs and natural born killers could get themselves in such hot water in the first place.
The question then arises as to how the Jews could accuse America of not acting quickly or doing enough in their behalf leading up to WWII and yet still claim to be at the forefront of every heroic deed before, during, and since then.
The same problem arises with the Westward movement.
But leave it to Hollywood to find a way to glorify the historical Jew and exonerate himself of any mischief along the way all at the same time.
Jewish Americans for Sarah Palin » Blog Archive » Jewish WWII hero of Pacific dies, was denied Medal of Honor
The more I learn of the daring exploits of the "hardworking" Jews, the less I feel that Israel is in any need of the BILLIONS of US aid dollars, or the BILLIONS in grants that US Jews receive via the Department of "Homeland Security", among many other US government PORK barrel projects designated to "redress the wrongs" done to them.
From watching TV . I have come to the definite conclusion that it is the impotent, queer bate, ne'r -do-well, GENTILE BOOBS who deserve the most help!!!, not the highly masculine and oh so competent blacks. And ESPECIALLY NOT the CHOSEN OF GOD!!!
You'd think that "G-d" would do a thing or to on behalf of his CHOSEN ONES occasionally instead of constantly relying on Congress to provide them with everything!
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #32
Astonishing 'Red Sea Crossing' video – $4.95 today only!
Robotic submarine cameras reveal ‘hundreds of Egyptian chariots strewn across the sea floor’
I'm inclined to agree with the deceased "Jewish" atheists Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov; the US Ashkenazim/Khazars had absolutely NOTHING to do with the parting of the Red Sea.
Last edited:
KokomoJojo
VIP Member
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
the nazis spoke the queens english, however americans and many brits now days as well speak bottom of the gene pool gutter.
and people today have an excuse for being retards
thats what you get for your money in egg u ma kay shun now days.
top shelf!
amazing what changing a few lousy definitions here and there can accomplish! Imagine if we had legislatures and judicial system that does the same thing. Oh wait.....
Last edited:
paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,163
- 1,130
I think it is more correct to say that Jewish led Bolsheviks slaughtered millions of their political opponents which is what led to their incarceration and subsequent deaths in German concentration camps. It should be noted that Hitler placed his opponents there regardless of their ethnicity.
It is also noteworthy that it was Marx, whose Father was an ordained Rabbi who is credited with the origin of communist doctrine. Since Jews like to take credit for so many things, they should not be denied credit for these other contributions to the world.
The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet Regime
I disagree with the author on at least one point here. Facts CAN be denied. Jews frequently deny them when they are placed in an unfavorable light.
Gentiles on the other hand , especially "whites" in the US and Germany above all, are forced to confess to their collective sins day and night forever and ever, world without end, with no provisions and few exceptions being made for individuals either. No attempts to qualify or rationalize any questionable actions taken in the name of "Western civilization" are permitted. No insinuations about actions attributable to the Jewish collective are allowed either. Historical revision is only open to those subjects in which questions of authorship or involving "to whom credit is due".
Those would be questions pertaining to who is chiefly responsible for the the scientific advancement and moral enlightenment of mankind. They may be assumed to have been usurped from discredited Jewish geniuses by evil "white" colonial imperialists and misogynistic , bigoted "white supremacists" who have never found anything better to do than exploit and oppress the colored peoples of the world, above all the "Jews". Such a task would only be suitable to the oppressed minority of them who constitute the best and brightest humanity has to offer, the Jews. After all the world rightly belongs to them since "G-d" said so. We have their word as proof!
We see in the case of the German people, ignorance was not an excuse. However, in light of the fact that the bloody Bolshevik revolution PRECEDED WWII one may almost be forgiven for doubting whether Hitler's intentions toward Russia were altogether sinister without reason, especially since there were so many Reds campaigning for a similar revolution within the boarders of Germany proper at the time; not to mention the German lands confiscated after WWI and Russia's obstinate refusal to allow a corridor to those lands which were still inhabited by former German citizens.
Interesting observations. Pretty insightful. I've always wondered why most American Jews leaned Communist. To me, it's a very interesting question to explore.
Truthseeker420
Gold Member
Most American Jews are communists? Most American Jews are patriotic Americans.
Last edited:
paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,163
- 1,130
Most American Jews do lean far Left/Communist. That's not disputable. But why? The Communists and Nazis in Europe were anything but kind to them? So why did so many Jews come to America and become Communists?
paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,163
- 1,130
Jews do control much of the American Media. They certainly control most of Film and TV. I don't see how you can dispute that. But don't take my word for it. Go and research who's currently running most of Film and TV. And most American Jews do tend to be Communists. But why? These are questions worth exploring. But if you don't want to...GTFO!!
Similar threads
