Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Historical perspective buddy.Slavery, franchise for property owning white males only, now those were real values
Oh yeah. . . because what the American government is doing to the global population and it's own citizens today? That is working out SO well. . .The Articles of Confederation were a bust.
. . . and based on their experiences with the heads of theological organizations in Europe. . . none of them wanted anything to do with religion in government.lol no they weren't 'deists'; deists were a tiny minority, just because maybe a few, maybe a half dozen famous ones claimed at one time to be 'deists' when they were young doesn't make most of them 'deists'. The overwhelming majority were Christians of one stripe or another.
Um....and your opinion on whatever you're alluding to means the Articles of Confederation weren't a bust?Oh yeah. . . because what the American government is doing to the global population and it's own citizens today? That is working out SO well. . .
Um....and your opinion on whatever you're alluding to means the Articles of Confederation weren't a bust?
Are you really advocating for the Articles of Confederation? Talk about trying to pick up a lost fight...Oh yeah, they were a bust if you were a land owning, wealthy elite.
If that is the sort of language and tactics in having that conversation you would use? Of course it is. . .Are you really advocating for the Articles of Confederation? Talk about trying to pick up a lost fight...
Let's be clear. Are you or are you not advocating for the Articles of Confederation?If that is the sort of language and tactics in having that conversation you would use? Of course it is. . .
Let's be clear. . . I'm advocating for local control of folks political destiny.Let's be clear. Are you or are you not advocating for the Articles of Confederation?
That doesn’t really answer my question directly. Do you think you could take a shot at answering my question directly?Let's be clear. . . I'm advocating for local control of folks political destiny.
Why? What would be the point? That time in history is gone, and those circumstances in history are also past. It is a pointless exercise.That doesn’t really answer my question directly. Do you think you could take a shot at answering my question directly?
What you quoted me isn't contradictory.Oh the victimhood. Won't somebody do something?
Why? What would be the point? That time in history is gone, and those circumstances in history are also past. It is a pointless exercise.
woulda-coulda-shouldas-layin-in-the-sun-talkin-bout-the-things-they-woulda-coulda-shel-silverstein-36-45-30.jpg&f=1&nofb=1[/IMG]
You have no need not to. You expressed an opinion on the subject then suddenly turned and ran from it. Seems odd.Why? What would be the point? That time in history is gone, and those circumstances in history are also past. It is a pointless exercise.
I have no need to.
You have no need not to. You expressed an opinion on the subject then suddenly turned and ran from it. Seems odd.
Yeah. W/E.
I see what you are doing here. Troll away. I'm not interested. Taunt a second, third or forth time if you please.
Another City Hall hack. There's a gun-grabbing county sheriff running up an off-the-books registered sex offender list.Let's be clear. . . I'm advocating for local control of folks political destiny.
Sheriff's have to run for office every few terms. If that is the will of the local populace, that is their choice. Who are you to say otherwise. Local folks know what they want for their community, and they know their local folks.Another City Hall hack. There's a gun-grabbing county sheriff running up an off-the-books registered sex offender list.