Do Federal/State/Local Governments Create Jobs?

[BluesLegend]

Government funded research has created the Internet, GPS, the microcircuit, Google, medical breakthroughs

Millions upon millions of jobs

The government did not create Google or the microcircuit, and it only played a small part in creating the internet. Most medical breakthroughs have been privately funded.

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

We could have solved simple poverty already, but the right insists on the "regulation" of a work ethic from the Iron Age.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but can't defeat the right? Libs are a hilarious tangle of nonsensical contradictions.

 

[BluesLegend]

Government funded research has created the Internet, GPS, the microcircuit, Google, medical breakthroughs

Millions upon millions of jobs

The government did not create Google or the microcircuit, and it only played a small part in creating the internet. Most medical breakthroughs have been privately funded.

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

 

[danielpalos]

Government funded research has created the Internet, GPS, the microcircuit, Google, medical breakthroughs

Millions upon millions of jobs

The government did not create Google or the microcircuit, and it only played a small part in creating the internet. Most medical breakthroughs have been privately funded.

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

We could have solved simple poverty already, but the right insists on the "regulation" of a work ethic from the Iron Age.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but can't defeat the right? Libs are a hilarious tangle of nonsensical contradictions.

Not at all; some on the left are even practicing the Patton doctrine of argumentation and letting the other fellow resort to fallacy for his Cause.

 

[danielpalos]

Government funded research has created the Internet, GPS, the microcircuit, Google, medical breakthroughs

Millions upon millions of jobs

The government did not create Google or the microcircuit, and it only played a small part in creating the internet. Most medical breakthroughs have been privately funded.

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

 

[Iceweasel]

Not at all; some on the left are even practicing the Patton doctrine of argumentation and letting the other fellow resort to fallacy for his Cause.

Pretty shrewd doctrine, the voters got duped into sweeping victories for the right. Keep up the good work.

 

[danielpalos]

why do you believe someone who works for living "creates" value while someone who doesn't work for money, doesn't?

If you have to ask, you're a deadbeat.

if you don't know, it is because you are an intellectual deadbeat and that form of danger to our democracy.

So my 43 years of working don't count? If you are a towering intellect (

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

We could have solved simple poverty already, but the right insists on the "regulation" of a work ethic from the Iron Age.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but can't defeat the right? Libs are a hilarious tangle of nonsensical contradictions.

Not at all; some on the left are even practicing the Patton doctrine of argumentation and letting the other fellow resort to fallacy for his Cause.

Pretty shrewd doctrine, the voters got duped into sweeping victories for the right. Keep up the good work.

Even the right doesn't complain about the "hidden tax" of price inflation during our "speculation" in the Middle East. Would y'all have even voted republican, if they had been honest and merely stated it would require wartime tax rates.

 

[BluesLegend]

The government did not create Google or the microcircuit, and it only played a small part in creating the internet. Most medical breakthroughs have been privately funded.

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

 

[danielpalos]

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

How shrewed is it to appeal to ignorance and speculate, with other Peoples' monies?

 

[rightwinger]

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

What happened between those losses during presidential election years?

Who was the last Republican to get over 50% in a presidential election?

 

[Lakhota]

Dude, the socialism of a public sector, already took us to the moon and back, while capitalism still searches for a profit motive.

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

Mid-terms.

 

[WinterBorn]

The stimulus money boosted the cable/fiber optic construction market hugely. There were dozens of projects that got built because the stimulus money started it and private utility companies picked up the rest.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

How shrewed is it to appeal to ignorance and speculate, with other Peoples' monies?

Now we are getting somewhere, is it the opinion of liberals that the masses are ignorant?

 

[danielpalos]

The socialism of a simple Standard, could have required redundant, fiber optic, network backbones, from the general government to each of the several States.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals can land a man on the moon but need government hand outs for food, housing, education, and medical?

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

What happened between those losses during presidential election years?

Who was the last Republican to get over 50% in a presidential election?

I'm glad you asked, in 2012 the year in which Obama looked American in the eye and lied his ass off the left was barely able to scrape back 6 of the 56 seats they lost in 2010, and after the lies became public knowledge the left suffered another historic loss in 2014. Any questions? lol

 

[danielpalos]

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

How shrewed is it to appeal to ignorance and speculate, with other Peoples' monies?

Now we are getting somewhere, is it the opinion of liberals that the masses are ignorant?

No, the opinion of this liberal, is that the right doesn't have a clue or a Cause, but still believes they have acquired and possessed, the "gospel Truth" of any given Thing, through argumentation.

 

[Edgetho]

Murderers create jobs, too.

They create jobs for Undertakers, Cops, Prosecutors, Jailers.....

douchebags.

The question should be, 'Does goobermint create anything worthwhile'

Clearly, no

 

[danielpalos]

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

What happened between those losses during presidential election years?

Who was the last Republican to get over 50% in a presidential election?

I'm glad you asked, in 2012 the year in which Obama looked American in the eye and lied his ass off the left was barely able to scrape back 6 of the 56 seats they lost in 2010, and after the lies became public knowledge the left suffered another historic loss in 2014. Any questions? lol

That is only until the left learns how to Use capitalism, for all of its worth; since, capitalism seems more useless to the right now that they hold a majority.

 

[rightwinger]

Only because the right continually exhibits market failures, in a moral of "goodwill toward men". We could have solved simple poverty last millennium, but for that.

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

What happened between those losses during presidential election years?

Who was the last Republican to get over 50% in a presidential election?

I'm glad you asked, in 2012 the year in which Obama looked American in the eye and lied his ass off the left was barely able to scrape back 6 of the 56 seats they lost in 2010, and after the lies became public knowledge the left suffered another historic loss in 2014. Any questions? lol

Democrats won the 2006, 2008 and 2012 elections
Republicans took 2010 and 2014

Far from any mandate for Republicans especially when you look at votes cast for Republicans vs votes cast for Democrats

 

[RKMBrown]

Okay so lets review you libs can land a man on the moon but you can't defeat the right who according to you are a bunch of dimwits? Please explain, smart enough to land a man on the moon but Bush a man who can barely put two words together in a sentence whips your ass twice? Smart enough to land a man on the moon but in 6 short years you went from a House majority to the smallest Democratic party minority since 1921? Those rascally Republicans out smarted you is that it? lmao

Not at all; I didn't vote for him, twice. And, only the right would believe they have a clue or a Cause when it was their, Ivy League, MBA who almost single handedly overturned a capital maxim that states: it only take money to make more money. Massive federal budget surpluses, was more money.

You are deflecting, lets try this again. You libs just bragged about putting a man on the moon yet as dumb as you people say the Right is they ***** slapped liberals with 2 historic losses in 4 years. Can you explain this?

What happened between those losses during presidential election years?

Who was the last Republican to get over 50% in a presidential election?

I'm glad you asked, in 2012 the year in which Obama looked American in the eye and lied his ass off the left was barely able to scrape back 6 of the 56 seats they lost in 2010, and after the lies became public knowledge the left suffered another historic loss in 2014. Any questions? lol

Democrats won the 2006, 2008 and 2012 elections
Republicans took 2010 and 2014

Far from any mandate for Republicans especially when you look at votes cast for Republicans vs votes cast for Democrats

Republicans took 2010 and 2014
Democrats won the 2012 elections

Far from any mandate for Democrats especially when you look at votes cast for Democrats vs votes cast for Republicans

 

[Wry Catcher]

In theory government has no money, unless they tax. They create currency, but the value of the currency is the production of the American worker and what people attach to that. This is why government merely redistributes money, and it does so at a loss in value due to the labor it requires to redistribute.

Word Salad ^^^. A statement which is ridiculous and nothing more than an echo of right wing propaganda.

Yes, taxes fund government, on all levels. What the taxes provide is the measure of their value. Is there waste in government, yep. Are there private sector businesses and industries whose net benefit is out done by the cost-deficit, yep (see Tobacco, Alcohol and the gun industry)